ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Anesthesia for open pulmonary resection

Anesthesia for open pulmonary resection
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jul 08, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Open pulmonary resection is most commonly performed to treat a known intrathoracic malignancy such as lung cancer or to diagnose pathology of a suspicious nodule or mass. Other indications for pulmonary resection include management of thoracic trauma, pulmonary infection, and bronchopleural fistula.

Surgical procedures for these indications include sublobar resection (segmentectomy, wedge resection), lobectomy, or removal of more than one lobe (bilobectomy, lobectomy plus segmentectomy). A pneumonectomy involves removal of the entire lung. Extrapleural pneumonectomy involves resection of the diseased lung, as well as mediastinal lymph nodes, ipsilateral pericardium, hemidiaphragm, or parietal or visceral pleura.

This topic will review anesthetic care for patients undergoing thoracotomy and open pulmonary resection, including preanesthetic consultation and preparation, intraoperative anesthetic management, and postoperative pain management. Management of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary resection is discussed separately. (See "Overview of minimally invasive thoracic surgery" and "Anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary resection".)

Lung isolation techniques that are typically required for these procedures and management of one lung ventilation (OLV) are discussed separately. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles" and "Lung isolation techniques".)

A separate topic emphasizes enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS), focusing on multimodal multidisciplinary standardization of perioperative care to expedite recovery, decrease hospital length of stay, reduce complications, and improve outcomes following pulmonary resection or other thoracic procedures. (See "Anesthetic management for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery".)

PREANESTHETIC CONSULTATION

History and examination — The preoperative consultation focuses on assessment of pulmonary and cardiovascular risks:

Pulmonary risk – Preoperative pulmonary evaluation for lung resection and the preanesthesia consultation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are discussed separately. (See "Preoperative physiologic pulmonary evaluation for lung resection" and "Anesthesia for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", section on 'Preanesthesia consultation'.)

Cardiovascular risk – Patients with lung cancer may have comorbid cardiovascular disease. Evaluation of perioperative cardiovascular risk is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of cardiac risk prior to noncardiac surgery".)

In addition, the anesthesiologist notes the presence or absence of:

Dyspnea due to generalized weakness or metastatic disease. Patients with severe dyspnea or weakness from any cause may require temporary controlled ventilation in the postoperative period.

Tumor invasion into adjacent structures causing shoulder and arm pain or neurologic deficits due to brachial plexus compression. Such preexisting abnormalities should be documented since the lateral decubitus and other patient positions employed for lung resection surgery may cause brachial plexus injury. (See "Patient positioning for surgery and anesthesia in adults".)

Facial and/or upper extremity edema suggesting obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC) by a large mass or associated mediastinal lymphadenopathy. SVC syndrome may affect vascular access and airway control during induction of anesthesia. (See "Anesthesia for patients with an anterior mediastinal mass".)

Pleuritic chest pain due to pleural invasion by the tumor or chronic pain due to metastatic disease. Baseline pain may impact efficacy of postoperative pain management strategies. (See 'Post-thoracotomy pain management' below.)

Preoperative tests

Pulmonary function tests – Preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are useful to predict potential difficulty with extubation and the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Preoperative tests of pulmonary function are discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Preoperative physiologic pulmonary evaluation for lung resection", section on 'Preoperative pulmonary function'.)

Imaging – Available imaging studies are reviewed for evidence of:

Tumor obstructing the tracheal or bronchial lumen, or altered airway anatomy due to previous surgery or radiotherapy, which may affect endobronchial intubation. (See "Lung isolation techniques".)

Pleural effusions, which may affect oxygenation during one lung ventilation (OLV). (See "One lung ventilation: General principles".)

Pericardial effusion, since cardiac tamponade may cause hypotension or even cardiac arrest during induction of general anesthesia. (See "Anesthesia for thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Cardiac tamponade' and "Anesthesia for thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Anesthetic considerations for specific procedures'.)

Laboratory studies – Routine laboratory tests typically obtained prior to open pulmonary resection include complete blood count; tests of hemostasis, electrolytes, and glucose; as well as tests of renal function. Preexisting renal insufficiency is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, and mortality after open pulmonary resection [1-3].

Abnormalities in hemostasis are noted as these may be a contraindication for some neuraxial and regional anesthetic techniques for pain management:

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or intrathecal techniques – (See 'Post-thoracotomy pain management' below and "Neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia techniques in the patient receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication", section on 'Spinal epidural hematoma (SEH)'.)

Most clinicians consider anticoagulation to be a relative contraindication to thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) placement, due to the deep and noncompressible location of the paravertebral space [4]. (See "Thoracic paravertebral block procedure guide" and "Thoracic nerve block techniques".)

Other regional nerve blocks (eg, erector spinae plane block, intercostal nerve blocks, serratus anterior plane or pectoralis nerve blocks) can usually be performed using ultrasound guidance, although the risks of performing these blocks in patients with coagulation abnormalities has not been established. (See "Thoracic nerve block techniques" and "Erector spinae plane block procedure guide".)

A type and screen for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is performed for all anatomic pulmonary resections, including segmentectomies. If the antibody screen is positive, at least two units of RBCs should be available as clinically significant hemorrhage from pulmonary or bronchial vessels may occur during dissection. Otherwise, availability of crossmatched units is based on the patient's medical comorbidities (eg, coronary disease, anemia) and the surgical risk of major hemorrhage. (See "Pretransfusion testing for red blood cell transfusion".)

Electrocardiogram (ECG) – A preoperative ECG is typically obtained prior to intrathoracic surgery. (See "Evaluation of cardiac risk prior to noncardiac surgery", section on 'Electrocardiogram for some patients'.)

Planning for postoperative analgesia — Planning for postoperative analgesia is important for patients undergoing a large thoracotomy incision. The postoperative analgesic technique is selected during the preanesthesia consultation, after discussion with the patient and examination of anatomical sites for regional analgesic techniques.

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) analgesia are effective techniques that are used when feasible (see 'Thoracic epidural analgesia' below and 'Paravertebral block' below). Thrombocytopenia or chronically administered anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medications may affect the timing of safe placement of an epidural or paravertebral catheter, as discussed separately. (See "Neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia techniques in the patient receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication".)

Alternative analgesic techniques are discussed with the patient if neither TEA nor TPVB is appropriate, or if attempted preoperative placement of a TEA or TPVB catheter is unsuccessful. (See 'Post-thoracotomy pain management' below.)

PREANESTHETIC PREPARATION

Enhanced recovery pathways for thoracic surgery – These institutionally designed pathways combine elements encompassing all phases of care: preoperative (eg, counseling), intraoperative (eg, normothermia, fluid restriction), and postoperative (eg, opioid-sparing analgesia, early ambulation). Such multimodal care plans are more common as institutions attempt to hasten postoperative recovery, reduce morbidity, and facilitate early hospital discharge after various types of surgery. (See "Anesthetic management for enhanced recovery after major noncardiac surgery (ERAS)".)

However, elements have not been standardized among institutions for thoracic surgery, and only limited data exist to assess the influence of enhanced recovery pathways on postoperative outcomes after pulmonary resection (eg, reduction in opioid use, improved postoperative pain control, decreased length of hospital stay, and costs) [5,6].

Preparation for airway control – Preoperative preparation includes (see 'Airway control' below):

An assortment of specialized endotracheal tubes (ETTs), including a variety of double-lumen ETTs (DLTs) and/or bronchial blockers for one lung ventilation (OLV). Single-lumen endobronchial tubes may be useful for facilitating lung isolation in surgeries involving the carina and/or mainstem bronchus.

A flexible bronchoscope.

A circuit for delivering continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to the nonventilated lung to manage hypoxemia.

Lung isolation techniques are discussed in detail separately. (See "Lung isolation techniques".)

Preparation for hemodynamic monitoring – (See 'Monitoring' below.)

Preparation of warming devices – Equipment to prevent hypothermia is prepared, including warming devices for fluid and/or blood administration, and forced air or other body warming devices. Risk for hypothermia begins shortly after induction due to exposure of most of the total body surface area to cold ambient temperatures during positioning and surgical prepping; subsequently, the large intrathoracic incision limits warming efforts.

Regional analgesic technique – Placement of a catheter for thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or thoracic paravertebral (TPVB) analgesia typically occurs in the immediate preoperative period or in the operating room shortly before induction of general anesthesia, although a TPVB technique may be accomplished after induction or directly in the open chest during surgery (see 'Thoracic epidural analgesia' below and 'Paravertebral block' below). Preparations are made in advance for one of these techniques or an alternate technique (see 'Post-thoracotomy pain management' below). This includes ensuring availability of equipment for the selected regional technique and analgesic agents for bolus dosing and/or continuous infusion.

INTRAOPERATIVE ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT

Monitoring — All patients will have standard noninvasive monitors, including electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry (SpO2), and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) cuff measurements. These are placed prior to induction of general anesthesia, while the patient is still in the supine position. After the airway has been secured, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and intermittent airway pressures and volumes are monitored.

Invasive monitors used in patients undergoing major pulmonary resection procedures (eg, lobectomy or pneumonectomy) include an intra-arterial catheter and a bladder catheter. The intra-arterial catheter may be inserted before or after induction of anesthesia, while the bladder catheter is typically inserted after induction but before repositioning the patient for surgery. Healthy patients undergoing a short procedure (eg, simple wedge resection of a localized lesion in the pulmonary periphery) generally do not require either of these invasive monitors.

All noninvasive and invasive monitors are secured to avoid displacement during repositioning, surgical prepping, and draping. After positioning, access to these may be limited.

Unique considerations for noninvasive monitoring during open pulmonary resection include:

Electrocardiography (ECG) – ECG leads may become dislodged, inaccessible, wet with prep solution, or nonfunctional during repositioning (eg, to the lateral decubitus position). (See 'Positioning' below.)

For left-sided thoracotomy cases, the V5 lead is typically placed in the V1 position, in the second interspace just to the right of the sternum, to avoid contamination of the surgical field. Sensitivity of ECG monitoring for ischemic events may be reduced when the combination of leads II and V5 is unavailable [7]. (See "Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in patients with ischemic heart disease", section on 'Monitoring for myocardial ischemia'.)

Pulse oximetry – Continuous pulse oximetry is important in patients with pulmonary disease, particularly during one lung ventilation (OLV). Some clinicians place two pulse oximetry probes (eg, on two extremities) during final positioning. However, direct measurement of PaO2 via arterial blood gas measurements provides a more useful estimate of the margin of safety above desaturation (ie, SpO2 <90 percent).

Capnography – Continuous capnography aids in maintaining adequate ventilation and may detect malposition of the double-lumen tube (DLT) or bronchial blocker. However, large gradients between arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) are common in patients with preexisting pulmonary disease, and this gradient worsens during OLV. Thus, intermittent arterial blood gas analysis is also used to detect hypercarbia during OLV.

NIBP cuff A loose-fitting cuff may become dislodged and nonfunctional during patient repositioning. (See 'Positioning' below.)

Monitoring with an intra-arterial catheter includes:

Continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure (BP) – Hemodynamic instability due to compression of the heart or major vessels, hemorrhage, hypoxia, hypercarbia, or high airway pressures is immediately recognized.

Intermittent sampling for arterial blood gases – Intermittent arterial blood gas analysis for direct measurement of PaO2 and PaCO2 is important in patients at risk for desaturation during procedures requiring OLV. Measurements may be obtained during two lung ventilation (baseline) following induction of general anesthesia and every 15 to 60 minutes during OLV, as needed. Final measurements may be obtained after completion of lung resection and reexpansion of the nonventilated lung to assess respiratory reserve before extubation.

Respirophasic variations in the arterial pressure waveform – Dynamic hemodynamic parameters based on analysis of respirophasic variation in the continuous arterial pressure waveform during positive pressure ventilation are often used to provide goal-directed therapy for major surgical procedures (figure 1 and table 1). However, these parameters are not generally useful during open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) [8,9]. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Dynamic parameters to assess volume responsiveness' and "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Goal-directed fluid therapy'.)

The bladder catheter is inserted to prevent bladder distention and to monitor:

Urine output – Urine output is typically measured in procedures expected to last longer than two hours.

Temperature – Temperature is continuously monitored to avoid hypothermia.

Infrequently used invasive monitors include:

Central venous catheter (CVC) – We do not insert a CVC in patients with normal cardiovascular function and adequate peripheral venous access. Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is a poor predictor of intravascular volume and fluid responsiveness [10]. (See 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' below.)

Central venous access may be useful for transfusion of blood products and maintenance of intravascular volume and hemodynamic stability if:

Adequate vascular access is not otherwise available

Infusions of vasopressor/inotrope agents are likely to be necessary

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) – TEE is not used routinely. However, patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary hypertension, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, significant valvular heart disease, or intracardiac shunting may benefit from TEE monitoring, particularly during pulmonary artery clamping, which may cause RV dysfunction [11]. (See "Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for noncardiac surgery".)

Also, TEE may be urgently employed to rapidly diagnose unanticipated causes of severe hemodynamic instability (eg, hypovolemia or hypervolemia, myocardial ischemia, severe left or right ventricular dysfunction, or tumor compression or embolization to the heart) [12-15]. (See "Intraoperative rescue transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)".)

Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) – Use of a PAC is rare but may be helpful in the setting of severe RV dysfunction or severe pulmonary hypertension. (See "Pulmonary artery catheterization: Indications, contraindications, and complications in adults", section on 'Indications'.)

Airway control — Airway control involves placement of a device to achieve OLV. Typically, a DLT is inserted as part of the induction and endotracheal intubation sequence, or a single-lumen endotracheal tube (ETT) is initially inserted with subsequent placement of a bronchial blocker. Final positioning of these devices is accomplished with fiberoptic bronchoscopic guidance. (See "Lung isolation techniques".)

The choice of lung isolation device and appropriate preparations depend on the nature and specific location of the planned resection, upper and lower airway anatomy, need for lung protection in patients with unilateral pulmonary infection or bleeding, and practitioner skill and preference. Also, the likelihood of postoperative controlled ventilation is considered. A single-lumen ETT with a bronchial blocker has an advantage in this situation compared with a DLT because the bronchial blocker can be withdrawn at the end of surgery, leaving the single-lumen ETT in place for the postoperative period. (See 'Final bronchoscopy before emergence' below.)

Advantages and disadvantages for devices used to achieve OLV and the clinical approach to device selection are discussed in detail separately. (See "Lung isolation techniques".)

Induction and maintenance — Selection of agents and techniques for induction of anesthesia is based on coexisting disease and conditions. (See "Induction of general anesthesia: Overview".)

During the maintenance phase, the patient must remain anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated to provide optimal surgical conditions for open pulmonary resection. (See "Maintenance of general anesthesia: Overview".)

Inhalation versus intravenous agents — We suggest an anesthetic maintenance technique based on the potent volatile inhalation anesthetic sevoflurane as the primary agent for maintenance of anesthesia, and we administer supplemental intravenous (IV) agents such as opioids, ketamine, and a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). One randomized study in 180 patients undergoing lung resection surgery demonstrated a lower incidence of mortality in the first year with a sevoflurane-based anesthetic technique compared with a propofol-based total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) technique (2.3 versus 12.5 percent; OR 5.37, 95% CI 1.23-23.54) [16]. Also, fewer postoperative pulmonary complications were noted in the sevoflurane group (14 versus 28 percent; odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% CI 1.14-5.26), as well as reduced expression of lung and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, in another randomized trial in 460 patients undergoing lung resection surgery with one lung ventilation, use of a desflurane-based anesthetic was not associated with a significant reduction in complications, compared with a propofol-based TIVA technique [17]. The bronchodilatory and antiinflammatory effects of potent volatile agents, and rapid elimination during emergence may be advantageous in some patients [18].

Inhalation agents have been associated with lower long-term survival compared with TIVA in one propensity-matched retrospective analysis of patients with any type of cancer; however, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown for lung cancer specifically. Purported reasons for lower survival with volatile anesthetic agents include impairment of immune function of cells (eg, neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, T-cells, natural killer cells). Volatile anesthetics also have antiapoptotic properties and upregulate hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt pathway signaling, which may promote proliferation of minimal residual disease. In contrast, propofol-based TIVA techniques may be protective due to anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of propofol, as well as its ability to preserve natural killer cell function. However, the clinical significance of these mechanisms is uncertain [19-25]. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the idea that either volatile agents or a propofol-based TIVA approach is superior regarding the impact on outcomes in open pulmonary resection. (See "Anesthesia and cancer recurrence", section on 'Intravenous versus inhalation anesthetics'.)

Use of neuraxial agents — If a thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) catheter or thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is placed prior to induction, a local anesthetic agent may be administered to supplement inhalation and/or IV general anesthetic agents (see 'Thoracic epidural analgesia' below and 'Paravertebral block' below). Use of neuraxial analgesia to supplement general anesthesia does not have a clinically significant effect on oxygenation during OLV. This option is often used in hemodynamically stable patients if they have a high anesthetic requirement. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'General versus combined thoracic epidural/general anesthesia'.)

We typically administer 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine as a bolus, with readministration approximately every 45 minutes if BP is stable. Lower concentrations of these local anesthetics may be less effective; however, administration of higher concentrations via a thoracic epidural may cause hypotension. Combinations of local anesthetic plus opioid (eg, 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 5 mcg/mL) are often administered via an infusion that is initiated before conclusion of surgery. During the postoperative period, such combinations achieve a balance between analgesic efficacy and the adverse side effects of each agent [26,27]. Epinephrine (eg, 2 mcg/mL) may be included to enhance analgesia by reducing systemic uptake of epidural opioids because of vasoconstriction of epidural vessels [28]. Typical combinations are institution-specific.

Use of neuraxial analgesia (with or without general anesthesia) has been associated with improved overall survival after cancer surgery compared with general anesthesia alone [29]. However, study results are inconsistent, and may not be relevant for lung cancer [30,31]. Theoretically, neuraxial analgesia may reduce surgical stress, opioid consumption, immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and eventual cancer recurrence [21,25]. In one retrospective study of patients undergoing open thoracotomy for lung cancer surgery, there were no differences in cancer recurrence for patients who received a neuraxial technique (TEA or TPVB) to provide postoperative analgesia compared with those who did not [32]. Several large, randomized controlled trials are underway in an attempt to understand if or to what degree specific anesthetics or adjuvants and techniques may impact cancer recurrence or survival. (See "Anesthesia and cancer recurrence", section on 'Regional anesthesia/analgesia'.)

Positioning — Induction of general anesthesia and airway management are accomplished while the patient is supine, and the patient is then repositioned as desired by the surgeon. The lateral decubitus or flexed-lateral positions are most commonly used for open pulmonary resection (figure 2 and figure 3). However, the supine, semisupine, or semiprone positions are used for selected intrathoracic procedures, depending on the planned technique and the preferences of the surgeon.

Position change is managed by the anesthesiologist, with care to avoid patient injury and to prevent displacement of airway devices, monitors, and vascular cannulae. After a position change, it is particularly important to reassess the integrity of the ETT and ensure correct positioning of the lung isolation device (double lumen tube or bronchial blocker). Late injuries related to improper positioning include peripheral nerve damage (particularly the brachial plexus), compartment syndrome (particularly in the dependent arm), and vision loss (due to external compression). Prevention of injury in various surgical positions is discussed separately. (See "Patient positioning for surgery and anesthesia in adults".)

Fluid and hemodynamic management

Maintenance of normovolemia – We administer a balanced crystalloid solution during open pulmonary resection to maintain normovolemia (ie, euvolemia). We employ a “moderate” goal-directed fluid management strategy to maintain normovolemia (ie, euvolemia) rather than a restrictive or liberal fluid management strategy. Although very restrictive limitation of crystalloid solutions may facilitate early extubation and reduce pulmonary complications [33-37], concern for hypovolemia with impaired tissue perfusion and acute kidney injury has led to development of moderate goal-directed strategies to maintain normovolemia as a component of protocols for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) [38,39]. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Goal-directed fluid therapy' and "Anesthetic management for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery", section on 'Maintenance of normovolemia'.)

While the fluid regimen should be individualized to optimize cardiac output (CO) and O2 delivery, we avoid excessive fluid administration (ie, >3 L in the 24 hours of the perioperative period) as this is associated with acute lung injury and delayed recovery after open thoracic surgery [33-35,40-46]. In one study, the risk of acute lung injury increased for each 500 mL increment of perioperative fluid (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36) [34]. Furthermore, attempts to improve oliguria do not improve outcomes. In a 2016 meta-analysis of 28 trials in surgical and critically ill patients, goal-directed therapy without targeting oliguria resulted in less renal dysfunction than fluid management strategies that employed targeted reversal of oliguria (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.61) [47].

Estimating fluid responsiveness – We monitor dynamic hemodynamic parameters to assess fluid responsiveness. In most patients, we administer a fluid challenge, typically 100 to 250 mL of a balanced crystalloid solution, if indicated to maintain normovolemia and optimal CO (ie, goal-directed therapy). (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Dynamic parameters to assess volume responsiveness'.)

Respirophasic variation in the intra-arterial pressure waveform is often used during major surgical procedures to assess intravascular volume status, using either visual estimation or devices that provide automated quantitative analysis of respiratory variations in systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), or stroke volume (SV) (figure 1 and table 1) (see "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Respiratory variations in arterial pressure waveform'). However, in the setting of an open chest and/or only one ventilated lung, indices based on respiratory variation may not accurately predict fluid responsiveness. In these settings, the normal relationship between positive pressure ventilation and changes in intrathoracic pressure are markedly altered [8,9]. Although some studies in patients undergoing thoracotomy suggest that total administered fluid volume is beneficially reduced with use of devices that perform automated arterial waveform analysis to guide fluid administration [48-50], data are inconsistent [8,9,51,52].

Crystalloids versus colloids – Colloids may be used to replace an equivalent volume of blood loss, while red blood cells (RBCs) are transfused only if necessary to maintain hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL [36,37,41,53]. We use albumin selectively in critically ill patients, those who are hypoalbuminemic and/or require rapid volume expansion [54]. However, use of albumin is controversial because it has not been unambiguously demonstrated to be superior to crystalloids for volume expansion, it may elicit allergic reactions, and it is expensive [55].

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are generally avoided due to concerns regarding coagulopathy [56] and renal dysfunction. HES administration has been associated with development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in retrospective studies of patients undergoing pulmonary resection [1,57]. The use of albumin for volume expansion is controversial. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Hydroxyethyl starches' and "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Albumin'.)

Fluid warming – All parenteral fluids are warmed to avoid hypothermia, a common complication of intrathoracic surgery.

Use of vasopressors – The combination of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia can cause mild to moderate hypotension. Rather than administering additional fluid to support BP in a euvolemic patient, we use an infusion of a low dose of a vasopressor agent if necessary, typically phenylephrine or norepinephrine (table 2).

Ventilation — Intrathoracic surgery with OLV can result in acute lung injury [18,40-42]. To minimize this risk, a protective ventilation strategy is used during both OLV and two lung ventilation, which includes maintenance of low tidal volume (TV) and low airway pressure, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), minimum oxygen (O2) concentrations, and, in selected patients, permissive hypercapnia [45,58,59]. The following synopsis is provided for guidance, and further details are discussed separately (see "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'Lung-protective ventilation strategies' and "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Lung protective ventilation during anesthesia') [60]:

Low TV ventilation – We employ a TV of 4 to 6 mL/kg with OLV; or a TV of 6 to 8 mL/kg with two lung ventilation [45,61].

Titrated respiratory rate – We adjust respiratory rate to maintain ETCO2 and PaCO2 near the patient's baseline.

Individualized PEEP – We titrate PEEP on the basis of respiratory system compliance and airway driving pressure [59,62-64].

Limited airway driving pressure – We employ a driving pressure limit of 15 cm H2O. Although a safe limit is not known, high airway driving pressure is associated with complications after OLV [62,65].

Minimum fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) – Minimize FiO2 to maintain SpO2 >90 percent.

Lung protective ventilation with a lower tidal volume (ie, 5 to 6 mL/kg) and PEEP of 5 and 8  cm H2O during anesthesia for lung resection or esophagectomy surgery has been inconsistently associated with improved postoperative outcomes, compared with high tidal volume and no PEEP [66,67]. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Lung protective ventilation during anesthesia'.)

Hypoxemia (SpO2 <90 percent) may develop during OLV. Prediction of hypoxemia and detailed management strategies are discussed separately. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'Management of hypoxemia'.)

When the pulmonary resection is complete, but before chest closure, blood and secretions are suctioned from the trachea and major bronchi. Except in the case of pneumonectomy, reexpansion of the nonventilated lung is necessary to reinflate all atelectatic areas and to check for significant air leaks at bronchial anastomotic sites. Reexpansion techniques are discussed separately. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'Re-expanding the nonventilated lung'.)

Final bronchoscopy before emergence — At the end of the procedure, the patient is returned to the supine position for final bronchoscopy if necessary, followed by emergence and extubation.

Often, the surgeon performs a final fiberoptic bronchoscopic examination to ensure that the bronchial passageways are patent, to remove residual blood and secretions, and to examine the newly created bronchial stump.

If a DLT has been used, the surgeon may perform bronchoscopy via this DLT, or it may be exchanged for a single-lumen ETT or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for accommodation of a large bronchoscope or surgeon-specific preferences. If ETT exchange is planned, oxygen should be administered at 100 percent concentration. Strategies to prevent loss of airway control or laryngospasm during exchange include:

Use of a tube exchange catheter to maintain access to the airway

Use of a fiberoptic or video bronchoscope to visualize passage of the ETT through the vocal cords

Administration of IV remifentanil or other IV anesthetic such as propofol or lidocaine to blunt airway reflexes and to reduce the risk of laryngospasm

Placement of an LMA with subsequent insertion of the bronchoscope through the LMA to avoid the need for exchange of the ETT

If laryngospasm occurs during attempted ETT exchange, gentle positive pressure ventilation is employed via a facemask or LMA. If desaturation develops, it may be necessary to administer a small dose of succinylcholine (0.1 mg/kg IV) to relax the vocal cords, or a full intubating dose of succinylcholine plus an anesthetic induction agent to accomplish urgent reintubation. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults for emergency medicine and critical care".)

Emergence and postoperative airway management

Planned extubation — For most patients undergoing open pulmonary resection, tracheal extubation is planned at the end of the surgical procedure. The patient is placed in a semi-Fowler's position (partially sitting with the head of the bed up at a 30 to 45 degree angle) for emergence from anesthesia. When the usual criteria have been satisfied, the patient may be extubated. (See "Maintenance of general anesthesia: Overview", section on 'Transition to the emergence phase'.)

In selected patients, noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is used cautiously to treat hypoxemia after extubation in the early postoperative period [66,67]. While not routinely used after pulmonary resection, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is reasonable if otherwise indicated (eg, patients with obstructive sleep apnea). In small studies, CPAP appears to improve oxygenation and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), without increasing air leakage through the chest drain or the incidence of other complications [68,69]. (See "Postoperative management of adults with obstructive sleep apnea", section on 'Positive airway pressure therapy' and "Respiratory problems in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)".)

Planned postoperative ventilation — Some patients may require a period of postoperative controlled mechanical ventilation. Examples include patients with marginal respiratory reserve, hemodynamic instability, unexpected blood loss, hypothermia, or those who had complex lung resection with or without chest wall resection.

If a DLT was used to achieve OLV, it is usually exchanged for a single-lumen tube at the end of the procedure, before leaving the operating room. A tube exchanger is employed to maintain access to the airway during this exchange of a DLT for a single-lumen tube. This is described separately. (See "Management of the difficult airway for general anesthesia in adults", section on 'Extubation'.)

In patients who develop airway and facial edema due to fluid administration and/or dependent head position during surgery, exchange of a DLT for a single-lumen tube may be dangerous. In such cases, if only a short period of postoperative ventilation is needed (one to two hours), we leave a left DLT in place. A right DLT is likely to be displaced with patient movement. Another option is to withdraw the DLT so that both lumens terminate in the trachea, above the carina. Generally, extubation can be accomplished after a period of upright positioning and administration of parenteral steroid therapy (4 to 8 mg IV dexamethasone) when edema has resolved. (See "Extubation management in the adult intensive care unit", section on 'Assess risk for postextubation stridor'.)

PULMONARY RESECTION IN COVID-19 PATIENTS — Thoracic surgical procedures such as pulmonary resection with intraoperative lung isolation involve high risk for aerosol generation. Elective procedures are postponed in COVID-19-positive patients. However, urgent pulmonary procedures may be optimal for some individuals (ie, for lung cancer), or emergency thoracic surgery may be necessary for lung trauma [70-75]. Management to minimize risk extent of exposure to aerosolized secretions in patients undergoing thoracic procedures are discussed in other topics. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles" and "Overview of infection control during anesthetic care", section on 'Infectious agents transmitted by aerosol (eg, COVID-19)' and "Anesthesia for adult bronchoscopy", section on 'Bronchoscopy in COVID-19 patients'.)

POST-THORACOTOMY PAIN MANAGEMENT — Adequate postoperative analgesia may reduce the risk of post-thoracotomy pulmonary complications [76-81]. Inadequate treatment of pain may increase this risk due to splinting of the injured hemithorax, diaphragmatic dysfunction, impaired pulmonary mechanics, and inadequate coughing and mucociliary clearance [76-80,82-85]. These processes result in development of atelectasis, shunting, and hypoxemia, which may lead to respiratory failure. (See "Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in adults", section on 'Pain control'.)

Regional anesthesia

Choice of technique — Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with local anesthetic plus an opioid, or continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TT) with local anesthetic, are the most effective techniques for post-thoracotomy analgesia [76,81,86-89]. The choice between these options is primarily based on clinician expertise and preference [90]. Early ERAS protocols have often defined epidural analgesia as an essential element of a multimodal analgesic approach in thoracic surgery patients, despite adverse effects that include hypotension and urinary retention. While limited available data suggest that continuous TPVB analgesia provides comparable pain relief with fewer adverse side effects, many clinicians are not familiar with this technique [76,81,86,87,89].

If neither TEA nor TPVB is appropriate due to coagulopathy, anatomical considerations, or patient refusal, or if attempts to place a TEA and/or TPVB catheter are unsuccessful, alternative regional techniques include intercostal nerve blocks and intrathecal opioid analgesia. A systemic opioid analgesic technique, typically patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), may also be necessary [76,81]. (See 'Other techniques' below.)

In a 2008 meta-analysis of post-thoracotomy pain management, TEA and TPVB techniques were generally superior to other regional techniques, and to systemic opioid analgesia, with regard to pain scores and requirements for supplemental opioid analgesia [76]. Hypotension was more common with TEA compared with systemic opioid analgesia in four studies (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-9.2).

Small, unblinded randomized trials have compared TEA versus TPVB [76,86-88,91]. In a 2016 meta-analysis that included 14 studies, these regional techniques were similar with regard to analgesic efficacy [88]. There were no differences in mortality, major complications, or length of hospital stay. There were fewer minor adverse events with TPVB compared with TEA, including hypotension (risk ratio [RR] 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.38), nausea with vomiting (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.75), and urinary retention (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.46). Other meta-analyses note similar results [76,87,92]. In a subsequent nonrandomized propensity score matched study of 648 patients undergoing open pulmonary resection, there were no differences between TPVB and TEA in mortality or any other complications [90]. In one retrospective study, TPVB was associated with higher long-term survival in patients undergoing open thoracotomy for lung cancer surgery, compared with either TEA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% CI 039-0.87) or PCA with a systemic opioid (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.79) [32].

Thoracic epidural analgesia

Advantages and disadvantages – Advantages of TEA over other techniques include potential intraoperative use to supplement general anesthesia if the epidural catheter is placed in the preoperative period (see 'Induction and maintenance' above). In the postoperative period, continuous TEA provides reliable and effective analgesia after thoracotomy [76,81,86,87]. A 2020 meta-analysis that included 19 trials with 1062 participants noted that pain intensity was lower 48 and 72 hours after surgery, and the incidence of pain was lower one to six months after surgery when the epidural was preemptively placed before rather than after the thoracotomy incision [93].

Disadvantages of TEA include technical difficulty with catheter placement at the thoracic level, particularly in patients with scoliosis, kyphosis, obesity, and other anatomical abnormalities. Studies report a failure rate of approximately 15 percent [81,83,86,87,94]. Adverse effects of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention may be more common with TEA compared with TPVB, and hypotension is also more common with TEA compared with systemic opioid analgesia. (See 'Choice of technique' above.)

Other potential complications of TEA (eg, epidural hematoma or abscess) are discussed separately [95]. (See "Overview of neuraxial anesthesia", section on 'Adverse effects and complications'.)

Technique and administration – The technique for placement of an epidural catheter is described separately (see "Epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: Techniques", section on 'Epidural anesthesia technique'). In patients undergoing thoracotomy, the quality of postoperative pain control is equivalent with thoracic epidural catheter threading distances of 3, 5, or 7 cm after entry into the epidural space [96].

For postthoracotomy pain management, mixtures containing a local anesthetic and an opioid are typically used to achieve a balance between analgesia and side effects (eg, 0.0625 to 0.125% bupivacaine mixed with 5 mcg/mL of fentanyl or 0.01 mg/mL of hydromorphone), administered at a rate of 6 to 10 mL/hour [26,76,86,87,97]. The incidence of hypotension increases if local anesthetic concentration is increased; however, lower concentrations of local anesthetics are less effective. Older adults require approximately 40 percent less epidural solution per hour, due to the positive correlation between patient age and extent of epidural spread, and may also benefit from a more dilute local anesthetic concentration [98]. We use 0.0625% bupivacaine mixed with 10 mcg/mL hydromorphone for older patients, administered at a rate of 6 to 8 mL/hour. (See "Continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Technique and management".)

TEA infusion for analgesic therapy is typically continued for two to three postoperative days [76,86-88]. If TEA is inadequate (eg, patients for whom the epidural block is partial and/or those with pain outside the surgical dermatomes such as ipsilateral shoulder or back pain), an alternative approach is to split the epidural infusion. In such cases, a continuous epidural infusion of local anesthetic is used, while intravenous (IV) opioid is administered by PCA. (See "Continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Technique and management", section on 'Inadequate analgesia'.)

Occasionally, discontinuation of TEA becomes necessary due to hypotension caused by infusion of local anesthetic or adverse effects of epidural opioids such as respiratory depression, urinary retention, and delayed gastric emptying. (See "Continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Technique and management", section on 'Discontinuation of epidural analgesia'.)

Paravertebral block

Advantages and disadvantages – Compared with TEA, catheter-based TPVB with continuous infusion of a local anesthetic agent provides comparable analgesia and may be associated with fewer adverse side effects [76,81,86-89]. (See 'Choice of technique' above.)

When TPVB is performed in the preoperative period, injection of local anesthetic may be used to supplement general anesthesia during the intraoperative period, with effectiveness similar to that of thoracic epidural. Although catheter insertion for TPVB may be performed prior to induction of anesthesia, an alternative is direct placement by the surgeon in the open chest [99]. This flexibility is advantageous when the surgical plan is changed (eg, when video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS] surgery is initiated, but intraoperative conversion to an open thoracotomy becomes necessary). Another advantage is that open placement on the surgical field may be safely performed in patients with impaired coagulation. In some institutions, operating room efficiency is facilitated by intraoperative placement [99].

Disadvantages of TPVB include lack of familiarity for many anesthesiologists. Failure may occur due to technical difficulty with catheter placement (even with successful needle placement within the paravertebral space) or insufficient spread within the paravertebral space [99-102]. However, reported failure rate is low for experienced clinicians: approximately 6 percent [86,87,101,102]. Other complications are rare [89]. (See "Thoracic paravertebral block procedure guide", section on 'Side effects, complications, and contraindications'.)

Technique and administration – The technique for placement of a TPVB is described separately (picture 1 and picture 2 and picture 3) [89]. (See "Thoracic paravertebral block procedure guide".)

Typical regimens for pulmonary resection surgery include initial administration of a bolus dose of local anesthetic (eg, 0.25% bupivacaine up to 0.3 mL/kg as a loading dose, or 20 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine if a higher dose is desired to improve analgesia). We reduce the local anesthetic concentration (eg, to 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine) and/or the volume (eg, to 10 to 15 mL per side) of the bolus dose if we are performing bilateral blocks, or if the block is used to supplement general anesthesia. Some clinicians add dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic infusion (eg, 1 mcg/kg administered over three to five minutes, followed by an infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg per hour) [103].

Regimens for postoperative continuous infusion of local anesthetic agent include 0.1% bupivacaine at 5 to 12 mL/hour, 0.25% bupivacaine at 0.1 mL/kg/hour, or 0.2% ropivacaine at 4 mL/hour. According to one systematic review, continuous infusions administered via a paravertebral catheter are associated with lower pain scores than intermittent boluses; addition of adjuvant clonidine or fentanyl did not improve scores [104]. Duration of continuous TPVB infusion to control postoperative analgesia is typically several postoperative days [76,86-88]. (See "Thoracic paravertebral block procedure guide".)

Other techniques — If neither TEA nor TPVB is appropriate or if attempted placement of a TEA or TPVB catheter is unsuccessful, other alternative regional analgesic techniques include the erector spinae, serratus anterior plane (image 1), pectoral nerve (image 1), or intercostal nerve blocks (figure 4 and figure 5 and image 2) [105-109]. Compared with TPVB, erector spinae block provides a similar level of analgesia for approximately 6 to 12 hours, and has similar complication rates [110]. Block duration may be prolonged by a continuous catheter technique [108]. (See "Erector spinae plane block procedure guide" and "Thoracic nerve block techniques".)

Another alternative is intrathecal opioid analgesia [111-113]. We often select intrathecal morphine as a component of an enhanced recovery protocol that employs mostly non-opioid analgesic therapies to reduce overall opioid requirement. However, since intrathecal morphine may cause delayed respiratory depression, postoperative monitoring for inadequate oxygenation and ventilation is necessary [76,81,107].

Although these alternative regional techniques provide effective short-term analgesia, analgesic duration is typically insufficient. Thus, achieving adequate pain control in a patient with a large thoracotomy incision may require additional intrathecal opioid boluses, use of a liposomal formulation of bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks to provide extended slow release of the local anesthetic [114], or initiation of PCA with IV systemic opioids. Although evidence remains limited [115], clinical experience is increasingly supporting the use of multilevel intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine as a component of a multimodal approach for effective postthoracotomy analgesia in the context of a comprehensive ERAS strategy [6]. Use of liposomal bupivacaine may be optimal for intercostal blocks [116-118]. Other components of a perioperative multimodal approach may include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ketamine, gabapentin, and glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone.

Although less severe than incisional pain, ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) frequently occurs following pulmonary resection, described as a dull, stabbing pain of moderate to severe intensity in the region of the deltoid muscle and lateral clavicle on the side of surgery [119-122]. This rarely persists after the second postoperative day [123]. In our experience, NSAIDs are the most effective and convenient method to prevent and treat ISP. (See "Anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary resection", section on 'Ipsilateral shoulder pain'.)

Techniques and agents used for these options are described separately:

(See "Erector spinae plane block procedure guide" and "Thoracic nerve block techniques", section on 'Serratus plane block' and "Thoracic nerve block techniques", section on 'Intercostal nerve block'.)

(See "Spinal anesthesia: Technique".)

(See "Use of opioids for postoperative pain control", section on 'IV opioids'.)

Opioid and nonopioid intravenous analgesics — Nonopioid agents are often employed after thoracic surgery to maximize comfort and reduce risk for pulmonary complications. However, limited use of an opioid may be necessary to provide effective analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. Multimodal opioid-sparing pain management strategies include a combination of regional anesthetic techniques and intravenous analgesic agents, as discussed in a separate topic. (See "Anesthetic management for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery", section on 'Nonopioid analgesics' and "Anesthetic management for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery", section on 'Opioid analgesics'.)

COMPLICATIONS — Pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery are the most common cause of morbidity followed by cardiovascular-related morbidity, and the incidence of these complications is higher in patients older than 70 years [124].

Pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, bronchospasm, and pneumonia can lead to respiratory failure. Early postoperative respiratory failure requiring reintubation is associated with increased mortality compared with patients who remain extubated [125]. In one retrospective study of nearly 17,000 patients undergoing pulmonary resection, 3.5 percent required reintubation (23 percent within 24 postoperative hours) [126]. Risk factors for reintubation included age, male gender, clinically significant comorbidities (or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥4), tobacco use, and prolonged duration of surgery. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is under investigation to prevent and/or treat acute respiratory failure after thoracic surgery [67,127-130].

In one retrospective study of more than 11,000 patients, unplanned admission to the intensive care unit after pulmonary resection was associated with a higher mortality rate compared with those who did not have an unplanned intensive care unit admission (29 versus 0.03 percent), as well as longer length of hospital stay (26 versus 6 days) [131]. Following hospital discharge, the most common reasons for readmission were subcutaneous emphysema, pneumonia, and pleural empyema in patients who had open pulmonary resection to treat lung cancer [132].

Additional information regarding complications of open pulmonary resection is available in a separate topic. (See "Sequelae and complications of pneumonectomy".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Preanesthesia consultation The preanesthetic consultation focuses on assessment of pulmonary and cardiovascular risks, as well as planning for postoperative analgesia. (See 'Preanesthetic consultation' above.)

Preanesthetic preparation Preoperative preparation includes placement of a thoracic epidural catheter for postoperative pain control before induction of general anesthesia, or placement of a paravertebral catheter either before induction or directly into the open chest during surgery. Equipment and devices to achieve one lung ventilation (OLV), hemodynamic monitoring, and fluid warming are also prepared. (See 'Preanesthetic preparation' above and 'Airway control' above.)

Monitoring In addition to standard noninvasive monitoring, patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy require an intra-arterial catheter for continuous monitoring of blood pressure (BP) and respirophasic variations in the arterial pressure waveform, as well as intermittent arterial blood gas sampling. A bladder catheter is inserted to monitor urine output and temperature. Other invasive monitoring techniques are used selectively. (See 'Monitoring' above.)

Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia We suggest a technique based upon the potent volatile inhalation anesthetic sevoflurane as the primary agent for maintenance of anesthesia (Grade 2B), and we administer supplemental intravenous (IV) agents such as ketamine and a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). If a thoracic epidural catheter was placed prior to induction, a local anesthetic agent may be administered to supplement general anesthetic agents. Anesthetic choices (eg, inhalation versus IV agents, intraoperative use of epidural agents versus none) do not affect oxygenation during OLV. (See 'Induction and maintenance' above.)

Positioning Position change after induction, most commonly to the lateral decubitus position (figure 2 and figure 3), is managed by the anesthesiologist, with care to avoid patient injury and prevent displacement of airway devices, monitors, and vascular cannulae. It is particularly important to reassess the integrity of the endotracheal tube (ETT) and correct positioning of the lung isolation device (double-lumen tube [DLT] or bronchial blocker) after any position change. (See 'Positioning' above.)

Fluid management We suggest a “moderate” goal-directed fluid management strategy to maintain normovolemia rather than a restrictive or liberal fluid management strategy (Grade 2C). We avoid excessive fluid administration (ie, >3 L in the 24 hours of the perioperative period), as this is associated with acute lung injury and delayed recovery. All fluids are warmed to avoid hypothermia. (See 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' above.)

Management of ventilation

Lung protective ventilation (LPV) – We suggest LPV strategies to minimize risk of acute lung injury (Grade 2B) (see "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'Lung-protective ventilation strategies'). These include:

-Low tidal volume (TV) ventilation: 4 to 6 mL/kg with OLV; 6 to 8 mL/kg with two lung ventilation

-Adjustment of respiratory rate to maintain end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) near the patient's baseline

-Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP): 5 to 10 cm H2O if TV is low (0 to 5 cm H2O in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD])

-Limited airway pressures: Plateau inspiratory pressures <30 cm H2O

-Minimum fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2): Minimum level to maintain SpO2 >90 percent

Reexpansion of the nonventilated lung – At the end of the surgical procedure, reexpansion of the nonventilated lung is necessary to reinflate all atelectatic areas and to check for significant air leaks. (See "One lung ventilation: General principles", section on 'Re-expanding the nonventilated lung'.)

Emergence and extubation Tracheal extubation is planned for most patients. (See 'Emergence and postoperative airway management' above.)

Final bronchoscopy before emergence – Often, a final bronchoscopy is performed, either via the DLT or after exchange to a single lumen ETT or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). (See 'Final bronchoscopy before emergence' above.)

Planned postoperative ventilation – If prolonged postoperative ventilation is required, a single-lumen ETT is preferred. A tube exchanger is used to maintain access to the airway when a DLT is exchanged for a single-lumen ETT. (See 'Planned postoperative ventilation' above.)

Pain management For management of post-thoracotomy pain, we suggest continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with local anesthetic plus an opioid, or continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) with local anesthetic, rather than other techniques (Grade 2B). If neither option is appropriate, alternatives include a multimodal approach with a regional anesthetic technique such as intrathecal opioid analgesia, erector spinae block, intercostal nerve block, or serratus anterior plane block and/or intravenous analgesics. Nonopioid agents are often employed to limit opioid use. In some cases, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with systemic opioids is necessary. (See 'Post-thoracotomy pain management' above.)

  1. Ishikawa S, Griesdale DE, Lohser J. Acute kidney injury after lung resection surgery: incidence and perioperative risk factors. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:1256.
  2. Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, American College of Physicians. Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144:581.
  3. Mathew A, Devereaux PJ, O'Hare A, et al. Chronic kidney disease and postoperative mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int 2008; 73:1069.
  4. Horlocker TT, Vandermeuelen E, Kopp SL, et al. Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43:263.
  5. Fiore JF Jr, Bejjani J, Conrad K, et al. Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151:708.
  6. Martin LW, Sarosiek BM, Harrison MA, et al. Implementing a Thoracic Enhanced Recovery Program: Lessons Learned in the First Year. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105:1597.
  7. London MJ, Hollenberg M, Wong MG, et al. Intraoperative myocardial ischemia: localization by continuous 12-lead electrocardiography. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:232.
  8. Raphael J, Regali LA, Thiele RH. Hemodynamic monitoring in thoracic surgical patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30:7.
  9. Jeong DM, Ahn HJ, Park HW, et al. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1158.
  10. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1774.
  11. Pedoto A, Amar D. Right heart function in thoracic surgery: role of echocardiography. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:44.
  12. Neustein SM, Cohen E, Reich D, Kirschner P. Transoesophageal echocardiography and the intraoperative diagnosis of left atrial invasion by carcinoid tumour. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:664.
  13. Suriani R, Konstadt S, Camunas J, Goldman M. Transesophageal echocardiographic detection of left atrial involvement of a lung tumor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7:73.
  14. Cowie B. Cardiovascular collapse and hypoxemia in a man with a right-sided mediastinal mass, undiagnosed atrial septal defect, and right-to-left shunt. J Clin Anesth 2014; 26:688.
  15. Schröder C, Schönhofer B, Vogel B. Transesophageal echographic determination of aortic invasion by lung cancer. Chest 2005; 127:438.
  16. de la Gala F, Piñeiro P, Reyes A, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications, pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses after lung resection surgery with prolonged one-lung ventilation. Randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous and inhalational anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:655.
  17. Beck-Schimmer B, Bonvini JM, Braun J, et al. Which Anesthesia Regimen Is Best to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Lung Surgery?: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2016; 125:313.
  18. Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung Injury After One-Lung Ventilation: A Review of the Pathophysiologic Mechanisms Affecting the Ventilated and the Collapsed Lung. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:302.
  19. Wigmore TJ, Mohammed K, Jhanji S. Long-term Survival for Patients Undergoing Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:69.
  20. Sessler DI, Riedel B. Anesthesia and Cancer Recurrence: Context for Divergent Study Outcomes. Anesthesiology 2019; 130:3.
  21. Hiller JG, Perry NJ, Poulogiannis G, et al. Perioperative events influence cancer recurrence risk after surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018; 15:205.
  22. Stollings LM, Jia LJ, Tang P, et al. Immune Modulation by Volatile Anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2016; 125:399.
  23. Inada T, Kubo K, Shingu K. Promotion of interferon-gamma production by natural killer cells via suppression of murine peritoneal macrophage prostaglandin E₂ production using intravenous anesthetic propofol. Int Immunopharmacol 2010; 10:1200.
  24. Zheng X, Wang Y, Dong L, et al. Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:1141.
  25. Kim R. Anesthetic technique and cancer recurrence in oncologic surgery: unraveling the puzzle. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2017; 36:159.
  26. Tan CN, Guha A, Scawn ND, et al. Optimal concentration of epidural fentanyl in bupivacaine 0.1% after thoracotomy. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:670.
  27. Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; :CD001893.
  28. Niemi G, Breivik H. The minimally effective concentration of adrenaline in a low-concentration thoracic epidural analgesic infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:439.
  29. Chen WK, Miao CH. The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies. PLoS One 2013; 8:e56540.
  30. Buggy DJ, Borgeat A, Cata J, et al. Consensus statement from the BJA Workshop on Cancer and Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114:2.
  31. Cata JP. Outcomes of regional anesthesia in cancer patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2018; 31:593.
  32. Lee EK, Ahn HJ, Zo JI, et al. Paravertebral Block Does Not Reduce Cancer Recurrence, but Is Related to Higher Overall Survival in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1322.
  33. Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A, et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1558.
  34. Alam N, Park BJ, Wilton A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84:1085.
  35. Yao S, Mao T, Fang W, et al. Incidence and risk factors for acute lung injury after open thoracotomy for thoracic diseases. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5:455.
  36. Ashes C, Slinger P. Volume management and resuscitation in thoracic surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2014; 4:386.
  37. Chau EH, Slinger P. Perioperative fluid management for pulmonary resection surgery and esophagectomy. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 18:36.
  38. Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55:91.
  39. Şentürk M, Bingül ES, Turhan Ö. Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2022; 35:89.
  40. Licker M, Fauconnet P, Villiger Y, Tschopp JM. Acute lung injury and outcomes after thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:61.
  41. Della Rocca G, Coccia C. Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26:40.
  42. Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM. Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24:681.
  43. Assaad S, Popescu W, Perrino A. Fluid management in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26:31.
  44. Zeldin RA, Normandin D, Landtwing D, Peters RM. Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 87:359.
  45. Fernández-Pérez ER, Keegan MT, Brown DR, et al. Intraoperative tidal volume as a risk factor for respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:14.
  46. Arslantas MK, Kara HV, Tuncer BB, et al. Effect of the amount of intraoperative fluid administration on postoperative pulmonary complications following anatomic lung resections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149:314.
  47. Egal M, Erler NS, de Geus HR, et al. Targeting Oliguria Reversal in Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Management Does Not Reduce Renal Dysfunction in Perioperative and Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:173.
  48. Lee JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, et al. Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:39.
  49. Haas S, Eichhorn V, Hasbach T, et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation does not result in pulmonary fluid overload in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012:687018.
  50. Zhang J, Chen CQ, Lei XZ, et al. Goal-directed fluid optimization based on stroke volume variation and cardiac index during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopy lobectomy operations: a pilot study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2013; 68:1065.
  51. Fu Q, Duan M, Zhao F, Mi W. Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation. Drug Discov Ther 2015; 9:296.
  52. Fu Q, Zhao F, Mi W, Zhang H. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy. Biosci Trends 2014; 8:59.
  53. Blank RS, Hucklenbruch C, Gurka KK, et al. Intraoperative factors and the risk of respiratory complications after pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92:1188.
  54. Opperer M, Poeran J, Rasul R, et al. Use of perioperative hydroxyethyl starch 6% and albumin 5% in elective joint arthroplasty and association with adverse outcomes: a retrospective population based analysis. BMJ 2015; 350:h1567.
  55. Vincent JL, De Backer D, Wiedermann CJ. Fluid management in sepsis: The potential beneficial effects of albumin. J Crit Care 2016; 35:161.
  56. Kozek-Langenecker SA. Fluids and coagulation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21:285.
  57. Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Lee AR, et al. The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury from Fluid Restriction and Hydroxyethyl Starch in Thoracic Surgery. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:186.
  58. Licker M, Diaper J, Villiger Y, et al. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care 2009; 13:R41.
  59. Kacmarek RM, Villar J. Lung-protective Ventilation in the Operating Room: Individualized Positive End-expiratory Pressure Is Needed! Anesthesiology 2018; 129:1057.
  60. Hol L, Nijbroek SGLH, Schultz MJ. Perioperative Lung Protection: Clinical Implications. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:1721.
  61. Colquhoun DA, Naik BI, Durieux ME, et al. Management of 1-Lung Ventilation-Variation and Trends in Clinical Practice: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg 2018; 126:495.
  62. Park M, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, et al. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology 2019; 130:385.
  63. Ferrando C, Mugarra A, Gutierrez A, et al. Setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure level with a positive end-expiratory pressure decrement trial after a recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg 2014; 118:657.
  64. Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, et al. Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:1070.
  65. Blank RS, Colquhoun DA, Durieux ME, et al. Management of One-lung Ventilation: Impact of Tidal Volume on Complications after Thoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:1286.
  66. Glossop AJ, Shephard N, Bryden DC, Mills GH. Non-invasive ventilation for weaning, avoiding reintubation after extubation and in the postoperative period: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109:305.
  67. Wittenstein J, Ball L, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: current evidence and practice. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32:44.
  68. Roceto Ldos S, Galhardo FD, Saad IA, Toro IF. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after lung resection: a randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 2014; 132:41.
  69. Nery FP, Lopes AJ, Domingos DN, et al. CPAP increases 6-minute walk distance after lung resection surgery. Respir Care 2012; 57:363.
  70. Thornton M, Reid D, Shelley B, Steven M. Management of the airway and lung isolation for thoracic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations for clinical practice endorsed by the Association for Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1509.
  71. Tryphonopoulos P, McFaul C, Gagne S, et al. COVID-19 and One-Lung Ventilation. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:e90.
  72. Şentürk M, El Tahan MR, Szegedi LL, et al. Thoracic Anesthesia of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Preliminary Recommendations for Airway Management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2315.
  73. Kostroglou A, Alevizou A, Sidiropoulou T. One-Lung Ventilation: A Simple Technique to Reduce Air Contamination During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2856.
  74. Shaylor R, Verenkin V, Matot I. Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Anesthesia for Elective Thoracic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Consensus Statement From the Israeli Society of Anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3211.
  75. Fiorelli S, Menna C, Piccioni F, et al. The Cutting Edge of Thoracic Anesthesia During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3203.
  76. Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, et al. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1026.
  77. Guay J, Choi P, Suresh S, et al. Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD010108.
  78. Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E, et al. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2008; 143:990.
  79. Manikian B, Cantineau JP, Bertrand M, et al. Improvement of diaphragmatic function by a thoracic extradural block after upper abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 1988; 68:379.
  80. Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:598.
  81. Romero A, Garcia JE, Joshi GP. The state of the art in preventing postthoracotomy pain. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 25:116.
  82. De Cosmo G, Aceto P, Gualtieri E, Congedo E. Analgesia in thoracic surgery: review. Minerva Anestesiol 2009; 75:393.
  83. Ready LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24:499.
  84. Licker MJ, Widikker I, Robert J, et al. Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:1830.
  85. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Shah R. Post-thoracotomy spirometric lung function: the effect of analgesia. A review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1999; 40:445.
  86. Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96:418.
  87. Ding X, Jin S, Niu X, et al. A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e96233.
  88. Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, et al. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2:CD009121.
  89. D'Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:915.
  90. Blackshaw WJ, Bhawnani A, Pennefather SH, et al. Propensity score-matched outcomes after thoracic epidural or paravertebral analgesia for thoracotomy. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:444.
  91. Tong C, Wu J, Xu M, Cao H. Comparison of adverse outcomes after thoracic epidural or paravertebral analgesia undergoing pulmonary lobectomy-a retrospective study. J Clin Anesth 2020; 67:109987.
  92. Scarfe AJ, Schuhmann-Hingel S, Duncan JK, et al. Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50:1010.
  93. Park SK, Yoon S, Kim BR, et al. Pre-emptive epidural analgesia for acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:1006.
  94. Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109:144.
  95. Kupersztych-Hagege E, Dubuisson E, Szekely B, et al. Epidural Hematoma and Abscess Related to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: A Single-Center Study of 2,907 Patients Who Underwent Lung Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:446.
  96. Williams SR, Belliveau M, Brulotte V, Ruel MM. Impact of thoracic epidural catheter threading distance on analgesia during the first 24 hours following thoracotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2016; 63:691.
  97. Mahon SV, Berry PD, Jackson M, et al. Thoracic epidural infusions for post-thoracotomy pain: a comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures vs. fentanyl alone. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:641.
  98. Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R. Effect of age on extradural dose requirement in thoracic extradural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71:445.
  99. Daly DJ, Myles PS. Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery: are they worth it? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:38.
  100. Conlon NP, Shaw AD, Grichnik KP. Postthoracotomy paravertebral analgesia: will it replace epidural analgesia? Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26:369.
  101. Naja Z, Lönnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:1184.
  102. Lönnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia 1995; 50:813.
  103. Dutta V, Kumar B, Jayant A, Mishra AK. Effect of Continuous Paravertebral Dexmedetomidine Administration on Intraoperative Anesthetic Drug Requirement and Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:159.
  104. Kotzé A, Scally A, Howell S. Efficacy and safety of different techniques of paravertebral block for analgesia after thoracotomy: a systematic review and metaregression. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:626.
  105. Chan VW, Chung F, Cheng DC, et al. Analgesic and pulmonary effects of continuous intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38:733.
  106. Dryden CM, McMenemin I, Duthie DJ. Efficacy of continuous intercostal bupivacaine for pain relief after thoracotomy. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70:508.
  107. Khalil AE, Abdallah NM, Bashandy GM, Kaddah TA. Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracotomy Pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:152.
  108. Jack JM, McLellan E, Versyck B, et al. The role of serratus anterior plane and pectoral nerves blocks in cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and trauma: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1372.
  109. Xin A, Hu R, Fletcher L, Tan CO. Comparing the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block catheters with surgically placed extrapleural catheters after thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:504.
  110. Fang B, Wang Z, Huang X. Ultrasound-guided preoperative single-dose erector spinae plane block provides comparable analgesia to thoracic paravertebral block following thoracotomy: a single center randomized controlled double-blind study. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7:174.
  111. Sudarshan G, Browne BL, Matthews JN, Conacher ID. Intrathecal fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75:19.
  112. Gray JR, Fromme GA, Nauss LA, et al. Intrathecal morphine for post-thoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:873.
  113. Mason N, Gondret R, Junca A, Bonnet F. Intrathecal sufentanil and morphine for post-thoracotomy pain relief. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:236.
  114. Khalil KG, Boutrous ML, Irani AD, et al. Operative Intercostal Nerve Blocks With Long-Acting Bupivacaine Liposome for Pain Control After Thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100:2013.
  115. Huan S, Deng Y, Wang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral block versus intercostal nerve block in thoracic surgery and breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237363.
  116. Manson WC, Blank RS, Martin LW, et al. An Observational Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Surgeon-Performed Intercostal Nerve Blockade With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Posterior-Lateral Thoracotomy Analgesia. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:1843.
  117. Campos JH, Seering M, Peacher D. Is the Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine the Future of Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery? An Update and Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3093.
  118. Patel KM, van Helmond N, Kilzi GM, et al. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Pain Physician 2020; 23:E251.
  119. Misiołek H, Karpe J, Copik M, et al. Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery procedures under general and regional anesthesia - a retrospective observational study. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2014; 11:44.
  120. Burgess FW, Anderson DM, Colonna D, et al. Ipsilateral shoulder pain following thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:365.
  121. Pennefather SH, Akrofi ME, Kendall JB, et al. Double-blind comparison of intrapleural saline and 0.25% bupivacaine for ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy in patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:234.
  122. Bunchungmongkol N, Pipanmekaporn T, Paiboonworachat S, et al. Incidence and risk factors associated with ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28:979.
  123. Blichfeldt-Eckhardt MR, Andersen C, Ørding H, et al. Shoulder Pain After Thoracic Surgery: Type and Time Course, a Prospective Cohort Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:147.
  124. Yano T, Kawashima O, Takeo S, et al. A Prospective Observational Study of Pulmonary Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Older Than 75 Years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 29:540.
  125. Karamanos E, Schmoekel N, Blyden D, et al. Association of Unplanned Reintubation with Higher Mortality in Old, Frail Patients: A National Surgical Quality-Improvement Program Analysis. Perm J 2016; 20:16.
  126. Burton BN, Khoche S, A'Court AM, et al. Perioperative Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Unplanned Intubation After Lung Resection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:1739.
  127. Brainard J, Scott BK, Sullivan BL, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen after thoracic surgery - A randomized prospective clinical pilot trial. J Crit Care 2017; 40:225.
  128. Yu Y, Qian X, Liu C, Zhu C. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Extubation. Can Respir J 2017; 2017:7894631.
  129. Ansari BM, Hogan MP, Collier TJ, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (Optiflow) as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Program After Lung Resection Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101:459.
  130. Stéphan F, Bérard L, Rézaiguia-Delclaux S, et al. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy Versus Intermittent Noninvasive Ventilation in Obese Subjects After Cardiothoracic Surgery. Respir Care 2017; 62:1193.
  131. Shelley BG, McCall PJ, Glass A, et al. Association between anaesthetic technique and unplanned admission to intensive care after thoracic lung resection surgery: the second Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care (ACTACC) National Audit. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1121.
  132. Quero-Valenzuela F, Piedra-Fernández I, Martínez-Ceres M, et al. Predictors for 30-day readmission after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1239.
Topic 94261 Version 29.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟