ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Management and outcome

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Management and outcome
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 16, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Monochorionic twin pregnancies are monitored for development of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS), and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) with ultrasound examination every two weeks, beginning at 16 weeks of gestation and continuing until the mid-third trimester. Most cases of TTTS present in the early second trimester and are staged according to the system shown in the table (table 1), formerly called the Quintero classification system. The stage may remain stable, regress, or progress over time, and progression can occur rapidly. (See "Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Screening, prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis", section on 'Our approach to monitoring'.)

The three primary approaches to management of TTTS are expectant management, fetoscopic laser ablation of anastomotic vessels, and amnioreduction. Selective fetal reduction is another option, but is rarely performed unless severe malformations or severe FGR are present and affect only one twin. The choice of approach depends on the stage, maternal symptoms and signs, gestational age, and availability of requisite technical expertise.

This topic will review the management and outcome of TTTS. The pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and monitoring of TTTS are discussed separately (see "Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Screening, prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis"). TAPS and sFGR are also reviewed separately. (See "Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS)" and "Selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies".)

MANAGEMENT OF STAGE I TTTS — The choice of therapy for stage I TTTS is based primarily on the severity of maternal discomfort from uterine distention, risk of progression, and cervical length.

Patients with no or tolerable symptoms and a normal cervical length

Choice of therapy — For patients with stage I (table 1) TTTS and no maternal symptoms or tolerable symptoms and transvaginal cervical length >25 mm, we avoid intervention and monitor TTTS status with weekly ultrasound examinations to detect progression to more severe disease. In addition to the morbidity associated with any intervention, unnecessary intervention can affect therapeutic options later in pregnancy if intervention becomes indicated because of progressive disease. For example, amnioreduction performed as a first-line treatment of minimally symptomatic stage I disease can result in an inadvertent septostomy or bloody amniotic fluid, which would make subsequent laser treatment difficult to undertake when indicated because of worsening TTTS.

This approach is based on limited but reassuring data of the outcome of well-defined stage I disease in the absence of any intervention [1-3]:

In an international randomized trial comparing expectant management with laser ablation in asymptomatic patients with stage I TTTS and cervical length >15 mm, overall intact survival at six months was similar for expectant management (77 percent) and immediate laser surgery (78 percent); however, 60 percent of expectantly managed cases progressed to severe disease and required surgical intervention [1]. This progression rate is higher than the rate of 27 percent (95% CI 16-39 percent) in a 2016 meta-analysis of observational studies [4].

Severe neurologic morbidity might be lower in those treated with immediate laser surgery versus expectant management, but the data did not allow a clear conclusion (2.6 versus 4.6 percent, RR 0.574, 95% CI 0.117-2.81). The trial was stopped early (at 117 of 200 planned inclusions) for slow accrual rate.

A 2023 meta-analysis of four observational studies and the randomized trial described above assessed the outcome of pregnancies with asymptomatic stable stage I TTTS by type of intervention and found the following rates of fetal survival [3]. None of the differences in survival between laser therapy and expectant management was statistically significant.

Expectant management

-At least one twin: 85.5 percent (189 out of 221)

-Single survival: 14.9 percent (33 out of 221)

-Double survival: 70.5 percent (156 out of 221)

Laser therapy

-At least one twin: 93.9 percent (250 out of 266)

-Single survival: 12.4 percent (33 out of 266)

-Double survival: 81.5 percent (217 out of 266)

Gestational age at delivery and preterm birth <32 weeks were also similar for the two groups. 

Prenatal follow-up and care — We monitor pregnancies with stage I TTTS and no maternal symptoms or tolerable symptoms and transvaginal cervical length >30 mm for disease progression with ultrasound:

Amniotic fluid volume is assessed weekly. The North American Fetal Therapy Network reported that the mean duration from diagnosis of stage I TTTS to a change in status was 11.1 days; in those cases that progressed, the mean duration was 9 days [5].

Fetal growth is assessed every three to four weeks. If selective fetal growth lag is identified (ie, one fetus with estimated fetal weight <10th percentile), Doppler blood flow studies of the umbilical artery and ductus venous are obtained weekly. (See "Selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies".)

Beginning at 16 weeks, Doppler blood flow studies to assess middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocities (MCA-PSV) are incorporated into the screening protocol of monochorionic multifetal pregnancies, along with Doppler blood flow studies of the umbilical artery (UA) and vein (UV) and ductus venosus (DV) [6]. Discordant values are indicative of twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS), a milder form of TTTS that occurs spontaneously in 5 percent of monochorionic twins. Discordancy is defined as MCA-PSV >1.5 multiples of the median (MoM) in one fetus in conjunction with a value of <1.0 MoM in the other. TAPS is discussed in more detail below. (See 'Twin anemia polycythemia sequence' below and "Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS)", section on 'Pregnancy management'.)

Beginning at 30 weeks, biophysical profile scores are obtained weekly.

If TTTS stage and symptoms remain stable, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology suggest scheduling delivery at 34+0 to 37+6 weeks of gestation, in the absence of complications necessitating earlier delivery [7]. In our practice, uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins are delivered by 37+0 weeks [8]. (See "Twin pregnancy: Labor and delivery", section on 'Monochorionic/diamniotic'.)

If TTTS progresses, then management depends on maternal symptoms, cervical status, and TTTS stage, as described in the following sections.

Patients with debilitating symptoms or short cervical length at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation

Choice of therapy — For patients with stage I TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation with debilitating symptoms (eg, significant respiratory distress and/or preterm contractions) or short cervix (≤25 mm) due to severe polyhydramnios, we recommend fetoscopic laser ablation, in agreement with most experts in the international medical community [9-11]. Cervical length <28 or 30 mm before laser surgery was predictive of preterm birth in two studies [12,13]. Expectant management is not a reasonable option given maternal discomfort and the increased risk for preterm birth.

Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses is an effective treatment of TTTS and, in contrast to amnioreduction alone, unlikely to require repetitive procedures. In a systematic review that assessed progression of stage I TTTS with various interventions, no pregnancy treated with laser ablation progressed to a more advanced stage, whereas 30 percent of pregnancies treated with amnioreduction progressed [14].

The procedure is described below. (See 'Fetoscopic laser ablation of anastomotic vessels' below.)

Prenatal follow-up and care after laser therapy — There are few data on which to base specific recommendations for prenatal follow-up and care after laser therapy. We have adopted the following protocol for routine post-laser fetal surveillance:

Weekly ultrasounds are performed for the first two weeks and then every other week after laser therapy until 30 weeks of gestation, to evaluate for complications and response to therapy [15] (see 'Complications' below):

The amniotic fluid and fetal membranes are assessed to detect signs of membrane separation, inadvertent septostomy, membrane rupture, unexpected changes in amniotic fluid volume, and evidence of a therapeutic response. Normalization of the amniotic fluid volume occurs by week 5 in the donor amniotic sac and by week 8 in the recipient amniotic sac in more than 95 percent of cases [16]. (See 'Persistent or recurrent TTTS' below.)

MCA-PSV is measured to detect TAPS due to residual placental anastomoses TAPS usually occurs in the first six weeks after laser therapy. As discussed above, TAPS is diagnosed when MCA-PSV is >1.5 MoM in one fetus in conjunction with a value of <1.0 MoM in the other. (See 'Twin anemia polycythemia sequence' below and "Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS)", section on 'Pregnancy management'.)

Fetal weight is estimated every three to four weeks to identify severe growth lag (ie, one fetus with estimated fetal weight <10th percentile), which is typically seen in the ex-donor twin. Doppler blood flow studies of the umbilical artery in the growth-restricted fetus are obtained weekly once viability is reached. If absent or reversed diastolic flow is observed in the umbilical artery, Doppler flow studies of the ductus venosus are added to the monitoring paradigm.

Growth-restricted donor twins often exhibit catch-up growth after laser ablation. One study reported the proportion of donor twins with growth restriction fell from 65 to 29 percent after the procedure [17]. However, if preterm birth because of growth restriction seems likely, a course of antenatal glucocorticoids is administered. (See "Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for reduction of neonatal respiratory morbidity and mortality from preterm delivery".)

Beginning at 30 weeks of gestation, biophysical profile scores are obtained weekly.

We do not routinely order post-laser fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although 2 to 6 percent of fetuses will have an ischemic hemorrhagic lesion on MRI at 30 to 32 weeks of gestation following laser therapy, one study noted that 82 percent of these cases were detected by ultrasound prior to MRI [18]. In addition, monochorionic twins are known to have white matter injury, even those without known diagnosis of TTTS, so if an injury is seen, it will not be known whether it is due to the procedure. Lastly, few centers have qualified individuals on-site to read/interpret a fetal MRI.

However, MRI may be informative in cases with a co-twin demise post-laser. In theory, all vascular communications between the twins should be closed so the surviving co-twin should not be at risk of hypotension/emboli at the time of the demise, but since recurrent TTTS is possible, International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) guidelines suggest consideration of imaging (MRI) 4 to 6 weeks after a demise is detected [15].

We schedule delivery by 37+0 weeks of gestation, in the absence of complications necessitating earlier birth. Preterm birth is indicated due to the risk of unexplained fetal death at term. Although the ISUOG suggests delivery as early as 34 weeks, there is no evidence of an increased risk of fetal demise after 34 weeks in pregnancies treated with laser surgery.

Patients with debilitating symptoms >26 weeks of gestation

Choice of therapy — For patients with stage I TTTS at >26 weeks of gestation with debilitating symptoms (eg, significant respiratory distress and/or preterm contractions) or short cervix (≤25 mm) due to severe polyhydramnios, we perform amnioreduction to reduce uterine overdistention and thereby relieve maternal symptoms [9,10]. Amnioreduction may also improve TTTS. (See 'Amnioreduction' below.)

The US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption for fetoscopes limits their use to the treatment of TTTS from 16 to 26 weeks of gestation. Practically, laser ablation at more advanced gestational ages would be subject to several technical limitations: Fetal vernix in the amniotic fluid reduces optimal visualization, placental vessels are larger in caliber and more difficult to successfully coagulate, and current fetoscopes may not easily traverse greater in utero distances. However, some centers outside of the United States offer laser ablation after 26 weeks of gestation, and there is increasing evidence that procedures performed at later gestational ages can result in outcomes comparable to those performed in the traditional 16- to 26-week period [19-22].

Prenatal follow-up and care — We have adopted the following protocol for routine post-amnioreduction fetal surveillance:

Following amnioreduction, fetal ultrasound examination is performed weekly to evaluate for complications, progression to more advanced stage of TTTS, and response to therapy. The amniotic fluid and fetal membranes are assessed to detect signs of membrane separation, inadvertent septostomy, membrane rupture, unexpected changes in amniotic fluid volume, and evidence of a therapeutic response.

Amnioreduction is repeated if the patient becomes symptomatic (contractions or respiratory compromise) due to uterine overdistention from recurrent polyhydramnios.

Fetal growth is assessed every three to four weeks. If selective fetal growth lag is identified (ie, one fetus with estimated fetal weight <10th percentile), Doppler blood flow studies of the umbilical artery in the growth restricted fetus are obtained weekly. If absent or reversed diastolic flow is noted, Doppler flow studies of the ductus venosus are added to the monitoring paradigm. If fetal growth discordance is detected and preterm delivery is likely, a course of antenatal glucocorticoids is administered.

Beginning at 28 weeks, Doppler blood flow studies to assess MCA-PSVs are obtained weekly. As discussed above, discordant values are indicative of TAPS, a milder form of TTTS that occurs spontaneously in 5 percent of monochorionic twins. TAPS is diagnosed when MCA-PSV is >1.5 MoM in one fetus in conjunction with a value of <1.0 MoM in the other. (See 'Twin anemia polycythemia sequence' below and "Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS)", section on 'Pregnancy management'.)

Beginning at 30 weeks of gestation, biophysical profile scores are obtained weekly.

Delivery is scheduled by 37+0 weeks of gestation, in the absence of complications necessitating earlier delivery. Early delivery is indicated due to the risk of unexplained fetal death at term.

MANAGEMENT OF STAGE II TO IV TTTS — Intervention for pregnancies at stage II to IV is indicated because reports suggest a poor prognosis with expectant management alone. Overall perinatal survival with stage II or more was only approximately 30 percent in a literature review of 28 studies involving a total of 68 pregnancies with untreated TTTS between 1966 and 1991 [23]. By comparison, perinatal survival was approximately 60 percent in two large more contemporary series with therapeutic intervention [24,25].

Choice of therapy at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation — Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses is the preferred procedure for definitive treatment of stage II to IV TTTS between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation [26].

Although a 2014 meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laser ablation with amnioreduction did not find a statistically significant improvement in survival with laser therapy, the two trials had discordant results (Eurofetus reported improved survival with laser ablation [27]; the United States trial did not [24]) and in both trials the laser ablation group was more likely to be alive without neurologic complications at six years of age [28]. However, there were several limitations to these data: <200 pregnancies were studied; approximately 90 percent of pregnancies in both trials had stage II or III disease, but the proportions of stage I and stage IV disease randomized were insufficient to answer the question regarding benefit. The Eurofetus trial enrolled patients at all stages of TTTS; of the 142 randomized cases, 11 were stage I (6 randomized to laser and 5 to amnioreduction) and 2 were stage IV cases (1 randomized to laser and 1 to amnioreduction). In the United States trial, stage I cases were excluded; of the 42 randomized cases, 4 were stage IV (3 randomized to laser and 1 to amnioreduction). Thus pregnancies in the United States trial were at the more severe end of the disease spectrum. Both trials were stopped early: Eurofetus was stopped early because a planned interim analysis demonstrated a significant benefit in the laser group. The United States trial was stopped early because referring clinicians were no longer willing to refer patients to the participating centers for randomization after the publication of the Eurofetus report. The reduced enrollment along with the finding of a statistical trend in adverse outcomes in recipient twins undergoing laser resulted in the decision to stop the trial.

Additional support for the effectiveness of laser therapy was provided by a 2013 meta-analysis of cerebral injury following laser therapy versus amnioreduction, which included four observational studies involving 357 children in the amnioreduction group and 269 children in the laser group [29]. Cerebral injury in live born infants in the amnioreduction group was more than sevenfold higher than in live borns in the laser group (95% CI 2.8-20.0). After excluding neonatal deaths from the analysis, infants from pregnancies treated with amnioreduction still had a marked increase in neurologic injury (relative risk 3.23, 95% CI 1.45-7.14) compared with the laser group. The gestational age at the time of intervention was comparable, 20 to 22 weeks; however, the median gestational age at delivery was lower in the amnioreduction group compared with the laser group, 28 to 31 versus 32 to 34. The authors speculated that the increased risk of cerebral injury in the amnioreduction group was due to the higher rate of prematurity.

Prenatal follow-up and care — Prenatal follow-up and care are identical to that in stage I TTTS patients treated with laser ablation. (See 'Prenatal follow-up and care after laser therapy' above.)

Choice of therapy at >26 weeks of gestation — Amnioreduction is the preferred intervention for treatment of stage II to IV TTTS at >26 weeks of gestation in the United States. As discussed above, the US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption for fetoscopes limits their use to treatment of TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation. Practically, laser ablation at more advanced gestational ages would be subject to several technical limitations: fetal vernix in the amniotic fluid reduces optimal visualization, placental vessels are larger in caliber and more difficult to successfully coagulate, and greater in utero distances may not be easily traversed by current fetoscopes. However, some centers offer laser ablation after 26 weeks of gestation, and there is increasing evidence that procedures performed at later gestational ages can result in outcomes comparable to those performed in the traditional 16 to 26 week period [19-22]. (See 'Amnioreduction' below.)

Prenatal follow-up and timing of delivery — Prenatal follow-up and delivery timing are identical to that in Stage I TTTS patients treated with amnioreduction. (See 'Prenatal follow-up and care' above.)

MANAGEMENT OF STAGE V TTTS — If one fetus has died, the major concerns for the co-twin are death (10 percent risk) or neurologic impairment (10 to 30 percent risk) due to their shared circulation [26]. Management is the same as in monochorionic twin pregnancies without TTTS. (See "Twin pregnancy: Management of pregnancy complications", section on 'Death of one twin'.)

In these cases, neither laser therapy nor amnioreduction can prevent brain damage in the surviving twin as the insult occurs at the time of the death of the co-twin. The goal is to optimize the outcome for the surviving co-twin and avoid complications of iatrogenic preterm birth. A thorough ultrasound survey of the surviving co-twin should be performed including Doppler blood flows studies of the middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV). Excluding fetal anemia (MCA-PSV) in the setting of an acute fetal co-twin demise essentially eliminates the possibility that major exsanguination occurred and most likely has a favorable prognosis [30]. In the preterm fetus, expectant observation with serial fetal ultrasound examinations every three to four weeks is performed to follow fetal growth and central nervous system development. Magnetic resonance imaging examination three to four weeks following the fetal demise is indicated to detect intracranial injury. Emergency delivery in the preterm setting does not improve co-twin outcome.

In utero transfusion to correct fetal anemia within 24 hours of fetal death has been offered at some centers, but the benefit of this intervention has not been established [31]. We perform in utero transfusion after an acute demise when fetal anemia is documented by MCA-PSV >1.5 multiples of the median. A fetal blood sample is drawn for hemoglobin/hematocrit and a slow transfusion is started while awaiting the results, which are used to determine the volume of transfusion. (See "Intrauterine fetal transfusion of red blood cells".)

FETOSCOPIC LASER ABLATION OF ANASTOMOTIC VESSELS — Fetoscopic laser ablation is a procedure in which a laser is inserted through a fetoscope and used to ablate superficial blood vessels on the surface of the placenta that cross the inter-twin membrane. Although anastomoses exist deep in the placenta, their afferent and efferent branches are superficial. Theoretically, coagulation of the superficial vessels should eliminate unbalanced twin-twin transfusion leading to volume rebalance and cessation of secretion and passive transfer of vasoactive mediators.

The procedure is available at several tertiary obstetric centers in the United States and worldwide. It should only be performed by clinicians with extensive training and expertise performing the procedure.

Contraindications are center specific and may include preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm labor, suspected abruption, significant membrane separation, fetal demise of one twin, fetal chromosomal or congenital abnormalities, and previous amnioreduction [20,32,33].

Patient preparation — Fetoscopic laser coagulation is generally performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, although some clinicians use regional anesthesia. General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation may be required in select cases because of maternal respiratory distress from extreme polyhydramnios. We administer a first-generation cephalosporin within one hour of starting the procedure; nifedipine 10 mg orally is given just prior to the procedure to suppress uterine contractions. After 24 weeks of gestation, a course of antenatal corticosteroids is administered in case of preterm birth. Although some clinicians administer indomethacin short term (<48 hours) or long term (>48 hours) [34] rather than nifedipine, we do not use indomethacin because of reports of an increased risk of renal compromise in the donor twin when multiple doses of this agent were used to treat hydramnios in the recipient twin. Long-term use of indomethacin can also cause premature constriction of the ductus arteriosus.

A thorough obstetric ultrasound examination is performed, including determination of the distance between the two placental umbilical cord insertion sites. If the sites are too close together (defined as <2 cm), the vascular anastomoses can be difficult to visualize and coagulate [35,36] and an alternative intervention or expectant management may be necessary. However, proximate cord insertions are uncommon, occurring in only 1 to 2 percent of cases of TTTS.

Procedure — The suspected inter-twin vascular equator is located in the region between the two placental umbilical cord insertion sites. The lie of the "stuck" donor twin typically parallels this equator. A site for entry into the recipient sac is selected at 90 degrees to the equator. Power Doppler is used to locate an avascular area in the uterine wall.

The skin is prepped with hexachlorophene and anesthetized with a local anesthetic (we use 0.25 percent bupivacaine). Percutaneous entry may be via the Seldinger technique or by sharp trocar. For the Seldinger technique, an 18-gauge diamond point needle is inserted followed by insertion of a J wire through the needle and then removal of the needle. A 9 to 12 French intravenous catheter is then placed percutaneously over the guide wire under ultrasound guidance. Alternatively, a sharp metal trocar can be placed in the cannula and used for entry into the uterus.

A 2 to 3 mm diameter fetoscope is then inserted through the cannula. If the placenta is anterior and centrally located, entry into the uterus from an extreme lateral approach can result in puncture of the placental edge or the dilated adnexal vascular complex. Specialized fetoscopes with 30 and 70 degree lens have been developed that allow better visualization of the anterior placenta in these cases. In rare cases where percutaneous access is not possible due to the adnexal vasculature, a laparoscopic-assisted approach can be utilized. This method directs the fetoscope through the posterior-lateral uterine wall under direct visualization [37].

We try to visualize all four distal extremities of both fetuses. This is especially important in cases of TTTS complicated by twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) where the plethoric twin may show signs of thrombosis of extremities (eg, skin bullae and blanching of the affected limb) [38].

We prefer the equatorial dichorionization (Solomon) technique, which has three components:

Identify the vascular equator and map the anastomoses – The inter-twin membrane on the placental surface is located as a landmark. The vascular equator is then identified and the types of anastomoses mapped. The type of anastomosis is determined based on several features as they are visualized through the fetoscope.

Arteriovenous (AV) or venoarterial (VA) connections appear as a single vessel originating from the donor or recipient; this vessel disappears into the placental mass and a second vessel in immediate proximity of the disappearing vessel can be traced leading back to the co-twin. The arterial component of the anastomosis is dark red-blue (deoxygenated blood), while the venous component is bright red (oxygenated blood). If color differentiation cannot be easily discerned, a vessel can be traced back to its origin from the cord insertion into the placenta. Placental arteries are noted to cross over placental veins.

Arterio-arterial (AA) anastomoses appear as dark tortuous vessels that connect the twin circulations on the surface of the placenta. Often, pulsating color changes can be seen by fetoscopy as the blood components of the two twins oscillate in the vessel.

Veno-venous (VV) anastomoses are rare. When present, they appear as relatively straight vessels that course between the two fetal circulations on the placental surface.

In most cases, the vascular equator can be located in the recipient sac; however, occasionally it is irregular with some component located in the donor sac. The uterine wall at either end of the placenta is examined carefully to ensure that an eccentric communicating vessel is not coursing outside of the placental mass.

Coagulate all visible anastomoses – Laser energy (20 to 40 watts from a diode or YAG laser) is applied through a 400 to 600 micron quartz fiber introduced through an operating channel in the fetoscope. A second channel allows for continuous irrigation to promote visualization. The anastomotic vessels are then coagulated in a specific sequential sequence (called sequential selective laser photocoagulation): Arteriovenous (AV, donor artery to recipient vein), then venous-arterial (VA, donor vein to recipient artery), and lastly arterial-arterial (AA) and venous-venous (VV) anastomoses. As an example, ablation of an AV anastomosis is shown in the video (movie 1) and in the following series of photographs (picture 1 and picture 2 and picture 3).

Sequential selective ablation has been associated with a 40 to 50 percent reduction in risk of intrauterine demise of the donor or recipient twin compared with selective ablation, the older standard technique. The sequential selective technique requires a specific order of ablation of the type of anastomoses as stated above, whereas ablations of the anastomoses with the selective technique are done in no specific order [25,39]. It has also been associated with an almost doubling of the rate of dual perinatal survival. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously because pregnancies that underwent the standard procedure in these studies did so because of technical difficulties that prevented them from receiving the full sequential selective treatment, potentially biasing the results [25].

Coagulate the vascular equator (equatorial dichorionization) – After coagulation of all visible anastomoses, a thin line of placental surface at the vascular equator is coagulated. This line extends from one edge of the placenta to the other and connects the white areas that resulted from coagulation of the individual anastomoses. The two parts of the chorionic surface of the placenta then become completely separated.

In a multicenter randomized trial comparing this Solomon technique with standard laser coagulation (ie, without coagulation of the vascular equator) in 274 patients with stage II, III, or IV TTTS, equatorial dichorionization resulted in lower rates of TAPS (3 versus 16 percent, odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.49) and recurrence of TTTS (1 versus 7 percent, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.98) [40]. When placentas were injected after delivery to look for residual anastomoses, fewer residual anastomoses were found when equatorial coagulation was performed [41]. However, equatorial coagulation did not lead to significant differences in perinatal mortality or severe neonatal morbidity, and neurodevelopment outcomes at two years of age were similar for both approaches [40,42]. Meta-analyses of observational studies comparing the two approaches also found the Solomon technique was associated with a reduction in recurrent TTTS [43], as well as higher chances of survival of at least one twin (92 versus 85 percent; pooled OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.03-5.19) and double survival (73 versus 62 percent; pooled OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.29-3.70) [44] compared with noncoagulation. One of these analyses also reported a higher risk of abruption with the Solomon technique.

The fetoscope is then removed and an amnioreduction is performed until the amniotic fluid volume appears normal in the recipient sac (maximum vertical pocket <8 cm). No more than 3 liters is removed due to the potentially increased risk of abruption. (See 'Amnioreduction' below.)

Complications — Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), TAPS, and inter-twin membrane rupture are the most common complications of fetoscopic laser ablation procedures. Intraamniotic bleeding may also occur and prevent completion of the procedure because of poor visualization. These complications are discussed below.

In a 2019 systematic review including 6746 fetoscopic laser photo-coagulation procedures, severe maternal complications occurred in 1.51 percent (95% CI 0.01-2.25), and placental abruption accounted for 130 of the 141 events [45]. The frequency of minor maternal complications was 4.03 percent (95% CI 2.73-5.56); bleeding during the procedure and chorioamnionitis were the two most common minor complications, accounting for 148 and 68, respectively, of the 241 minor events. In this review, obstetric complications such as PPROM, chorionic membrane separation, preterm labor, and preterm birth were not considered maternal complications.

Other infrequent complications that have been reported include recurrent TTTS and amniotic fluid leakage into the maternal peritoneal cavity [46]. Intraperitoneal leaking is self-limited but often causes maternal discomfort, which can be controlled with analgesics.

Preterm birth — The average gestational age at delivery after fetoscopic laser surgery is approximately 31 to 33 weeks of gestation [47]. The major risk factors include preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), short cervix, amnioinfusion during the laser procedure, and increased number of anastomoses [48].

The most common etiology for preterm birth is spontaneous preterm labor, which occurs in 48 percent of patients, followed by indicated preterm birth, which occurs in 32 percent, and scheduled deliveries in 20 percent [49].

We do not place a cerclage to reduce the risk of preterm birth, even in patients with a short cervix. Although we have found that approximately 25 percent of pregnancies with TTTS, short cervix, and undergoing fetoscopic laser surgery delivered within four weeks and almost two-thirds delivered prior to 32 weeks with expectant management, cervical cerclage does not appear to prolong pregnancy or improve survival and may actually shorten latency [50,51]. Other preventive interventions such as cervical pessary, vaginal progesterone, and combination treatments for short cervix in TTTS remain to be explored. Vaginal progesterone appears to be the most promising [51].

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes — The most common serious complication of fetoscopic intervention is PPROM, which occurred within one and three weeks postprocedure in 7 and 17 percent of cases, respectively, in one series [46] and in up to 40 percent of cases in two other series [52,53]. PPROM is associated with a two-week mean reduction in the gestational age at birth [54]. Diagnosis and management are the same as in any pregnancy. (See "Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Prelabor rupture of membranes before and at the limit of viability".)

Iatrogenic PPROM has been attributed to a persistent fetal membrane defect at the trocar entry site. Use of a small operative cannula (9 or 10 French versus 12 French) decreases the risk of PPROM but prevents use of large diameter fetoscopes and fetoscopes with angled lenses, which increase the likelihood of successful laser ablation [48,55].

Instillation of platelets, maternal blood, absorbable gelatin, or a collagen plug has been tried to plug the defect, but none of these approaches has been effective [56].

Membrane separation — Membrane separation can usually be seen at the site of trocar entry and is often evident on ultrasound by 24 hours after the laser procedure. It can progress on subsequent ultrasound examinations to completely encircle the uterine cavity, and no therapeutic interventions are available to prevent or correct this complication. Membrane separation is reported after 8 to 20 percent of fetoscopic laser procedures for TTTS [57-59]. Earlier gestational age at the time of the procedure appears to be a risk factor [60] In a meta-analysis (six studies, 1881 pregnancies), fetoscopic laser procedures for TTTS were associated with increased risks for PPROM <34 weeks of gestation (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.76–9.03) and preterm birth <32 weeks (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.16–2.80) [60]. Increasing severity of chorioamnion separation, particularly ≥10 mm, is associated with worsening pregnancy outcomes [59,61]. Others have noted that the combination of membrane separation and septostomy is associated with a higher rate of preterm birth ≤34 weeks than either complication alone [62].

Rupture of the inter-twin membranes — Rupture of the inter-twin membranes (incidental septostomy) creating iatrogenic monoamniotic twins occurs in up to 20 percent of cases following laser therapy [63]. It should be suspected when the amniotic fluid in the donor sac normalizes rapidly (within 24 hours of the laser procedure) and the fluid in both sacs has the same echogenicity. Occasionally, the diagnosis can be confirmed because of fetuses with entangled cords or fetal parts that extend across membranes.

In our experience, the risk for incidental septostomy was higher in procedures performed later in gestation (21.9 versus 20.3 weeks) and in cases with more severe polyhydramnios (maximum vertical pocket in recipient 12.5 versus 10.7 cm), and lower in pregnancies with sFGR (24 versus 45 percent) [64]. Measures to reduce septostomy include selecting a port of entry that enables instruments to directly enter the recipient sac and avoiding aggressive laser ablation over the membrane in an attempt to coagulate vessels in the donor twin placental territory.

Complications include cord entanglement and limb constriction defects, so-called pseudoamniotic band syndrome (PABS) formation resulting in compromise of blood flow to the cord or fetal extremities [65,66]. In a series of 672 consecutive TTTS cases treated with fetoscopic laser surgery, PABS occurred in 15 (2.2 percent): 10 of 15 recipient and 5 of 15 donor twins [67]. Consequences included amputation of toes in five cases and fetal demise because of constriction of the umbilical cord in one case. Risk factors for PABS were lower gestational age at laser surgery (OR per week 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.79) and the presence of postprocedural chorioamniotic membrane separation (OR 42, 95% CI 5-319).

In a meta-analysis of perinatal outcome after incidental septostomy related to laser therapy of TTTS, which did not include the above series, septostomy was associated with an increased frequency of preterm birth <32 weeks compared with no septostomy (64 versus 33 percent; OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.27-12.63), with trends toward an increase in PABS (4 of 109 cases [3.7 percent] versus 10 of 802 cases [1.2 percent]) and reductions in survival of at least one newborn (OR 0.47) and both newborns (OR 0.69) [68]. Others have noted that the combination of septostomy and membrane separation is associated with a higher rate preterm birth ≤34 weeks than either complication alone [62].

Prenatal intervention is not indicated for PABS. We manage these pregnancies similarly to naturally occurring monoamniotic twins. (See "Monoamniotic twin pregnancy (including conjoined twins)".)

Intraamniotic bleeding during the procedure — Intraamniotic bleeding may obscure visualization and thus prevent completion of the procedure. In these cases, amnioinfusion of crystalloid using the rapid infuser pump utilized by trauma services can be very useful to clear the operative field. We have this equipment available and set it up at all procedures.

Lactated Ringer solution with 1 g/L of nafcillin is administered (clindamycin 400 mg/L if the patient is penicillin allergic). The remaining portion of the procedure should be completed as rapidly as possible; often a nonselective coagulation method is used (ie, coagulating all vessels along the inter-twin membrane). Depending on the severity of the bleeding, coagulation of the vascular equator (ie, Solomon technique) may not be possible.

Fetal demise — In a meta-analysis of pregnancies with TTTS managed with fetoscopic laser ablation, the overall incidence of fetal demise (procedure- and/or TTTS-related) ranged from 11 to 36 percent for the donor and 7 to 25 percent for the recipient [69].

Risk factors for donor demise (n = 4892) were:

AA anastomoses (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.35-5.85)

Umbilical artery absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.9-2.8)

stage III TTTS (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.53-3.12)

Intertwin estimated fetal weight discordance of >25 percent (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.44-2.40)

Absent or reversed a-wave in the ductus venosus (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.45-2.3)

sFGR (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.40-2.27)

Sequential selective coagulation was protective (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.58)

Risk factors for recipient demise (n = 4594) were:

MCA-PSV >1.5 MoM (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.36-6.88)

Umbilical artery absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.91-3.74)

Absent or reversed a-wave in the ductus venosus (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.55-3.64)

Stage IV TTTS (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.01-4.6)

Pregnancies with single fetal demise are at increased risk of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes [70].

Twin anemia polycythemia sequence — TAPS is a mild variant of TTTS characterized by a large inter-twin hemoglobin difference without amniotic fluid discordance. Post-laser TAPS occurs in 2 to 13 percent of TTTS pregnancies treated with laser ablation up to six weeks after the procedure [71]. Risk factors include TTTS with few anastomoses and no artery-to-artery communications before laser ablation [72]. TAPS may also occur spontaneously. The pathogenesis, diagnosis, classification, and management of TAPS are reviewed separately. (See "Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS)".)

Outcome of TTTS treated with laser ablation

Persistent or recurrent TTTS — A 2012 systematic review reported the incidence of recurrent TTTS ranged from 0 to 16 percent [73]. Residual anastomoses can lead to persistent or recurrent TTTS. They may have been missed at the time of laser ablation or revascularized after the procedure. Measures for reducing the risk of residual anastomoses include more careful scrutiny of the placental margins (where the majority of residual anastomoses have been found) and use of the Solomon technique. (See 'Procedure' above.)

Persistent or recurrent TTTS can be managed with expectant management, repeat fetoscopic laser ablation, or amnioreduction, depending on the stage and gestational age.

Reverse TTTS — Reverse TTTS is a rare occurrence post-laser in which each twin assumes the former phenotype of the co-twin (eg, the former donor develops hydramnios and the former recipient develops oligohydramnios). It is unclear how the apparent reversal of the transfusional gradient occurs, but when present, the outcomes are compromised with overall survival rates <50 percent [74,75].

Perinatal survival — In a 2020 meta-analysis including 610 stage I, 692 stage II, 1146 stage III, 247 stage IV, and 4 stage V TTTS [2]:

The frequency of survival of at least one twin by stage was:

stage I – 86.9 percent

stage II – 85 percent

stage III – 81.5 percent

stage IV – 82.8 percent

stage V – 54.6 percent

The frequency of no survivor by stage was:

stage I – 11.8 percent

stage II – 15.0 percent

stage III – 18.6 percent

stage IV – 17.2 percent

stage V cases – 45.4 percent

Additionally, in a study comparing neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with TTTS undergoing fetoscopic laser surgery with data for uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins from the Trial of Progesterone in Twins and Triplets to Prevent Preterm Birth (STTARS), TTTS was associated with a lower gestational age at delivery (31.0 ± 4.6 versus 33.5 ± 2.4 weeks), which was the only factor significantly associated adverse neonatal outcome in multivariate logistic regression [76].

Coexistent sFGR can adversely affect outcome. (See "Selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies", section on 'Outcome of sFGR with coexistent TTTS'.)

Neurodevelopmental impairment

In a 2021 meta-analysis of risk factors of neurodevelopmental impairment after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for TTTS (9 studies, 1499 TTTS survivors) [77]:

The overall incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment was 14 percent (95% CI 9-18)

Risk factors for neurodevelopmental impairment were later gestational age at treatment, earlier gestational at birth (especially before 32 weeks: OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.02–4.94]), and low birth weight

TTTS stage, recipient or donor status, postlaser TAPS or recurrent TTTS, small for gestational age, and cotwin fetal demise did not have statistically significant effects on neurodevelopmental outcome

The overall risk of neurologic impairment post-laser therapy is not significantly different from the baseline risk in monochorionic twins without TTTS or in dichorionic twins matched for gestational age at birth [78-80]. In another study, the Ages Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) was significantly higher in TTTS undergoing laser surgery compared to uncomplicated monochorionic twins. Almost all of the risk of neurologic impairment in survivors is due to complications related to preterm birth, rather than a direct result of TTTS or laser therapy [80-83]. In the largest study of long-term pediatric outcomes in twins treated with fetoscopic laser therapy for TTTS (n = 417), the incidence of behavioral problems was not greater than among children in the general population at two years of age [84] but an increased rate of mild to moderate cognitive impairment and severe neurologic impairment was observed in 73 children who were also followed to age 5 years, suggesting that the absence of impairment cannot be excluded confidently before school age [85]. Presence of behavioral problems appeared to be mostly associated with severe neurodevelopmental impairment.

Perioperative fetal hemodynamic changes, such as elevated MCA-PSV >1.5 MoM and change from normal umbilical artery pulsatility index, appear to be associated with an increased risk for severe cerebral injury [86]. Only 2 percent of fetuses in twin pregnancies complicated by TTTS treated with laser surgery exhibit a brain abnormality (ischemic or hemorrhagic lesion, ventriculomegaly) on ultrasound before birth [87].

Coexistent sFGR can adversely affect neurodevelopment outcome. (See "Selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies", section on 'Neurodevelopmental outcome'.)

Renal effects — Chronic hypovolemia in the donor may result in vascular remodeling and chronic kidney disease [88], which may be prevented by laser ablation [89]. One series reported kidney failure in 7 percent of 101 newborns who received fetoscopic laser ablation compared with 20 percent who received amnioreduction [90]. Another series reported short-term neonatal renal dysfunction (creatinine level of >100 micromol/L) in 7 percent of the laser group versus 38 percent of the nonlaser group [91]. In a study of the long-term renal effects of TTTS treated with laser, all 18 surviving twin pairs had normal serum and urinary markers of renal function and no significant differences were noted between donors and recipients at a median age of three years [92].

Cardiovascular effects — Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation usually improves cardiovascular function in both twins. Optimal initiation of this therapy has shortened disease duration compared with past decades, which appears to provide time for cardiac remodeling before birth, with continued remodeling postnatally in recipients [93,94]. However, congenital heart disease, particularly mild to severe right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, is detected postnatally in 8 to 16 percent of cases and may require postnatal intervention [95-99]. One series of 51 recipient survivors of laser therapy observed that 8 percent had pulmonary stenosis at the time of birth, a 200-fold increase over the rate in the general population [96]. One-half of the cases required valvular balloon dilation for treatment. Nevertheless, when assessed at a mean age of 10 years, childhood cardiac function was normal in the majority of surviving donors and recipients [100].

Long-term maternal effects — No adverse long-term maternal effects with respect to subsequent fertility, obstetric, and gynecologic outcomes have been observed after fetoscopic laser therapy [101].

AMNIOREDUCTION — Amnioreduction reduces uterine overdistention, which is a risk factor for preterm labor and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). It also decreases pressure inside the amniotic cavity and may thus improve uteroplacental perfusion [102,103].

Procedure — A variety of amnioreduction techniques have been described; no randomized trials have evaluated whether one is safer and more effective than another. There is no consensus regarding how much fluid to remove, how rapidly to remove the fluid, use of tocolytic medications, or use of antibiotics.

A reasonable approach is to anesthetize the skin with a long-acting local anesthetic (eg, bupivacaine). Under ultrasound guidance, a long 18-gauge spinal needle is introduced into the amniotic sac with polyhydramnios, avoiding the placental edge, if possible. The placenta may be markedly thinned on ultrasound imaging because of uterine distension from the excessive amniotic fluid.

The needle is placed as close to the midline of the uterus as possible with a slight angulation toward the maternal xiphoid to reduce the risk of needle displacement as the uterine size diminishes with drainage of amniotic fluid. The needle can be connected to one end of the specialized tubing included in a disposable thoracocentesis tray (male to male ends) while the other end of the tubing is connected to a short 18-gauge needle that is spiked into a disposable vacuum bottle. This set-up maintains a closed system, avoids excessive needle manipulation, and allows the rate of flow to be controlled with the rollerball valve in the line.

Some authors recommend removing fluid until polyhydramnios is no longer present (maximum vertical pocket <8 cm); others suggest removing no more than 5 liters of amniotic fluid over approximately an hour [104]. Decompression of the uterus with rapid removal of a large volume of fluid may cause placental abruption or fetal bradycardia; therefore, we suggest removing no more than 3 liters of fluid in severe TTTS.

Outcome — The International Amnioreduction Registry reported outcomes from the largest series of TTTS patients undergoing amnioreduction [105]. A total of 223 twin pregnancies from 20 fetal medicine units were diagnosed with TTTS prior to 28 weeks of gestation and treated with 760 amnioreductions. The major findings from this series were:

Complications associated with the procedure included PPROM within 48 hours of the procedure (6 percent), spontaneous delivery (3 percent), fetal distress (2 percent), fetal death (2 percent), placental abruption (1.3 percent), and chorioamnionitis (1 percent).

Both twins were live born in 55 percent of pregnancies, one twin was live born in 31 percent, and both twins were stillborn in the remaining 14 percent. During the first four weeks of neonatal life, an additional 30 percent of live born twins succumbed.

Intracranial abnormalities were observed on neonatal cranial ultrasound in 24 percent of recipient twins and 25 percent of donor twins that survived to four weeks of age.

SELECTIVE FETAL REDUCTION — Selective reduction of one twin is an option that may improve the prognosis of the co-twin if a technique is used that does not impact its circulation. While perinatal outcomes are comparable among the various procedures (bipolar cord coagulation, laser cord coagulation, and radiofrequency ablation [RFA]), RFA is our preferred technique for selective reduction of monochorionic twins because the smaller device reduces maternal morbidity [106].

The fetus predicted to have the least chance for survival is usually selected for the reduction procedure. For example, a recipient with advanced cardiac findings or hydrops or a donor that is growth restricted with discordant fetal weight >30 percent and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler [107].

TTTS – The available data do not show a difference in survival according to whether the donor or recipient twin is targeted [108]. If bipolar cautery is used, reduction of the recipient twin is technically easier since its cord is easily visualized floating amid the excess amniotic fluid. Oligohydramnios around the donor makes this twin a more difficult target, although the donor cord can be grasped through the inter-twin membrane after entry into the recipient's amniotic cavity. This can result in a septostomy and the risk of subsequent cord entanglement. However, if the donor twin is the primary target, amnioinfusion can be performed to improve access for the bipolar forceps. Radiofrequency ablation does not require amnioinfusion [109].

Experience with selective reduction for TTTS is limited. One study including 15 cases of TTTS treated with bipolar coagulation of the umbilical cord reported an overall survival of 87 percent in the co-twin, but preterm prelabor rupture of membranes occurred in 20 percent of pregnancies within three weeks of the procedure [110]. Another study including 22 cases of TTTS treated with bipolar cautery reported an overall survival of 77 percent [111]. One child had developmental delay at 16 months of age. In a third series of 24 cases of TTTS, the overall survival was 92 percent (one fetal death and three neonatal deaths) [108]. One infant exhibited mild motor delay at 18 months.

SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Triplet pregnancies — Fetoscopic laser ablation for treatment of TTTS in dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) and monochorionic-triamniotic (MCTA) triplets appears to result in similar rates of perinatal and neonatal survival as compared with those in monochorionic diamniotic twins.

A meta-analysis of perinatal outcome after fetoscopic laser surgery for TTTS in triplet pregnancies reported the following major findings (156 [DCTA], 37 [MCTA]) [112]:

Overall fetal survival – DCTA 79 percent, MCTA 74 percent

All three fetuses survived in 53 percent of DCTA and 39 percent of MCTA pregnancies

Overall neonatal survival – DCTA 75 percent, MCTA 71 percent

Preterm birth <28 weeks – DCTA 14 percent, MCTA 21 percent

Preterm birth <32 weeks – DCTA 61 percent, MCTA 82 percent

Life-threatening abnormality of one fetus — Selective reduction has been performed for treatment of TTTS when one fetus has a very poor prognosis (eg, life-threatening malformation, severe growth restriction, severe cardiac failure, evidence of brain injury).

Stuck twin overlying the vascular equator — Laser ablation may not be possible when a stuck twin overlies the site of the placental anastomoses. Selective reduction is an option in these cases.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Multiple gestation".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Stage I TTTS

No or tolerable symptoms and cervical length >25 mm – For patients with stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) with no or tolerable symptoms and cervical length >25 mm, we suggest expectant management rather than invasive therapy (Grade 2C). We perform weekly ultrasound examinations to detect progression to more severe disease. We also follow these pregnancies with weekly Doppler blood flow studies to assess middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocities (MCA-PSV) beginning at 16 weeks and weekly biophysical profile scoring to assess fetal wellbeing beginning at 30 weeks of gestation. Delivery is scheduled at 36 to 37 weeks if TTTS stage and symptoms remain stable. (See 'Patients with no or tolerable symptoms and a normal cervical length' above.)

Debilitating symptoms or short cervix at 16 to 26 weeks – For patients with stage I TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation with debilitating symptoms (eg, significant respiratory distress and/or preterm contractions) or short cervix (≤25 mm) due to severe polyhydramnios, we recommend fetoscopic laser ablation rather than amnioreduction (Grade 1B). Amnioreduction performed as a first-line treatment can result in an inadvertent septostomy or bloody amniotic fluid, which would make subsequent laser treatment difficult to undertake when indicated because of worsening TTTS. Amnioreduction is also more likely to require serial procedures. (See 'Patients with debilitating symptoms or short cervical length at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation' above.)

Post-laser therapy, normalization of the amniotic fluid volume occurs by week 5 in the donor amniotic sac and by week 8 in the recipient amniotic sac in more than 95 percent of cases.

These pregnancies are followed closely with ultrasound and Doppler to detect abnormalities of amniotic fluid volume, abnormalities of the inter-twin membrane, and discordance in MCA-PSV or fetal growth. Biophysical profile scoring is performed weekly as of 30 weeks of gestation. Delivery is scheduled at 36 to 37 weeks of gestation, in the absence of complications necessitating earlier delivery. (See 'Prenatal follow-up and care after laser therapy' above.)

Debilitating symptoms or short cervix at >26 weeks – For patients with stage I TTTS at >26 weeks of gestation with debilitating symptoms or short cervix (≤25 mm) due to severe polyhydramnios, we suggest amnioreduction rather than laser ablation (Grade 2C). The US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption for fetoscopes limits their use to treatment of TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation, and practically, laser ablation at more advanced gestational ages would be subject to several technical limitations. (See 'Patients with debilitating symptoms >26 weeks of gestation' above.)

These pregnancies are followed closely with ultrasound and Doppler to detect abnormalities of amniotic fluid volume, abnormalities of the inter-twin membranes, and discordance in MCA-PSV or fetal growth. Amnioreduction is repeated if symptomatic polyhydramnios recurs (ie, contractions or respiratory compromise). Biophysical profile scoring is performed weekly as of 30 weeks of gestation. Delivery is scheduled at 36 to 37 weeks of gestation in the absence of complications necessitating earlier delivery. (See 'Prenatal follow-up and care' above.)

Stage II to IV TTTS

Pregnancies at 16 to 26 weeks – For patients with stage II to IV TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation, we recommend laser ablation of placental anastomoses rather than serial amnioreduction (Grade 2B). Laser ablation results in greater prolongation of gestational age, higher neonatal survival, and improved long-term neurologic outcome. We use a sequential selective technique followed by the "Solomon" method to assure complete dichorionization of the placenta. (See 'Choice of therapy at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation' above.)

Pregnancies > 26 weeks – For patients with stage II to IV TTTS after 26 weeks of gestation, we suggest serial amnioreduction rather than laser ablation (Grade 2C). Use of laser therapy after 26 weeks is limited in the United States due to US Food and Drug Administration restrictions on the use of current fetoscopes as well as technical issues that make laser therapy difficult in the third trimester. (See 'Choice of therapy at >26 weeks of gestation' above.)

Role of selective feticide – Selective feticide may be the best option when TTTS is complicated by a life-threatening anomaly in one of the fetuses, after failed laser ablation, or when TAPS or recurrent TTTS occurs soon after laser therapy. (See 'Life-threatening abnormality of one fetus' above.)

Long-term outcome – Approximately 9 percent of survivors of laser therapy have some degree of long-term neurodevelopmental abnormality. Neurologic follow-up of apparently healthy neonates after laser therapy is warranted. (See 'Neurodevelopmental impairment' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Kenneth J Moise, Jr, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Stirnemann J, Slaghekke F, Khalek N, et al. Intrauterine fetoscopic laser surgery versus expectant management in stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an international randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224:528.e1.
  2. Di Mascio D, Khalil A, D'Amico A, et al. Outcome of twin-twin transfusion syndrome according to Quintero stage of disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:811.
  3. Nassr AA, Hessami K, Zargarzadeh N, et al. Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation versus expectant management for stage I twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:1229.
  4. Khalil A, Cooper E, Townsend R, Thilaganathan B. Evolution of Stage 1 Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016; 19:207.
  5. Emery SP, Hasley SK, Catov JM, et al. North American Fetal Therapy Network: intervention vs expectant management for stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:346.e1.
  6. Townsend R, Khalil A. Ultrasound screening for complications in twin pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23:133.
  7. Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:e145.
  8. Cheong-See F, Schuit E, Arroyo-Manzano D, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 354:i4353.
  9. Wilson RD, Johnson A, Ryan G. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: Should laser ablation of placental anastomoses be used in all cases of twin to twin transfusion? Prenat Diagn 2009; 29:6.
  10. Wagner MM, Lopriore E, Klumper FJ, et al. Short- and long-term outcome in stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery compared with conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:286.e1.
  11. Molina S, Papanna R, Moise KJ Jr, Johnson A. Management of Stage I twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an international survey. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:42.
  12. Robyr R, Boulvain M, Lewi L, et al. Cervical length as a prognostic factor for preterm delivery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:37.
  13. Papanna R, Mann LK, Baschat AA, et al. Cervical length in prediction of preterm birth after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:175.
  14. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Survival outcomes of twin-twin transfusion syndrome stage I: a systematic review of literature. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30:5.
  15. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:247.
  16. Assaf SA, Korst LM, Chmait RH. Normalization of amniotic fluid levels after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29:1431.
  17. Chmait RH, Korst LM, Bornick PW, et al. Fetal growth after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:47.e1.
  18. Stirnemann J, Chalouhi G, Essaoui M, et al. Fetal brain imaging following laser surgery in twin-to-twin surgery. BJOG 2016.
  19. Middeldorp JM, Lopriore E, Sueters M, et al. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after 26 weeks of gestation: is there a role for fetoscopic laser surgery? BJOG 2007; 114:694.
  20. Baud D, Windrim R, Keunen J, et al. Fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome before 17 and after 26 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:197.e1.
  21. Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez-Crespo JM, et al. Fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after 26 weeks of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31:30.
  22. Lecointre L, Sananes N, Weingertner AS, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome before 17 weeks' gestation: laser data, complications and neonatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:299.
  23. Berghella V, Kaufmann M. Natural history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Reprod Med 2001; 46:480.
  24. Crombleholme TM, Shera D, Lee H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:396.e1.
  25. Chmait RH, Kontopoulos EV, Korst LM, et al. Stage-based outcomes of 682 consecutive cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery: the USFetus experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:393.e1.
  26. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Simpson LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:3.
  27. Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:136.
  28. Roberts D, Neilson JP, Kilby MD, Gates S. Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD002073.
  29. van Klink JM, Koopman HM, van Zwet EW, et al. Cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental impairment after amnioreduction versus laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33:81.
  30. Shek NW, Hillman SC, Kilby MD. Single-twin demise: pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28:249.
  31. Quarello E, Stirnemann J, Nassar M, et al. Outcome of anaemic monochorionic single survivors following early intrauterine rescue transfusion in cases of feto-fetal transfusion syndrome. BJOG 2008; 115:595.
  32. Sasso EB, Hardley MT, Bottura I, et al. Characteristics of referred patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome who did not undergo fetal therapy. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:280.
  33. Akkermans J, Peeters SH, Middeldorp JM, et al. A worldwide survey of laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:168.
  34. Mustafa HJ, Krispin E, Tadbiri H, et al. Efficacy of long-term indomethacin therapy in prolonging pregnancy after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a collaborative cohort study. BJOG 2022; 129:597.
  35. Gandhi M, Papanna R, Moise K, et al. Treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome with proximate umbilical cord insertions. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30:1151.
  36. Zhao DP, Peeters SH, Middeldorp JM, et al. Laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome with proximate cord insertions. Placenta 2013; 34:1159.
  37. Middeldorp JM, Lopriore E, Sueters M, et al. Laparoscopically guided uterine entry for fetoscopy in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with completely anterior placenta: a novel technique. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22:409.
  38. Schrey S, Huber A, Hecher K, et al. Vascular limb occlusion in twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): case series and literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:131.e1.
  39. Quintero RA, Ishii K, Chmait RH, et al. Sequential selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20:763.
  40. Slaghekke F, Lopriore E, Lewi L, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 383:2144.
  41. Slaghekke F, Lewi L, Middeldorp JM, et al. Residual anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome after laser: the Solomon randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:285.e1.
  42. van Klink JM, Slaghekke F, Balestriero MA, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in twin-twin transfusion syndrome survivors randomized for the Solomon trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:113.e1.
  43. Shamshirsaz AA, Chmait RH, Stirnemann J, et al. Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:72.
  44. D'Antonio F, Herrera M, Oronzii L, Khalil A. Solomon technique vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and perinatal outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:731.
  45. Sacco A, Van der Veeken L, Bagshaw E, et al. Maternal complications following open and fetoscopic fetal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:251.
  46. Yamamoto M, El Murr L, Robyr R, et al. Incidence and impact of perioperative complications in 175 fetoscopy-guided laser coagulations of chorionic plate anastomoses in fetofetal transfusion syndrome before 26 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1110.
  47. Beck V, Lewi P, Gucciardo L, Devlieger R. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and fetal survival after minimally invasive fetal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31:1.
  48. Papanna R, Block-Abraham D, Mann LK, et al. Risk factors associated with preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:48.
  49. Malshe A, Snowise S, Mann LK, et al. Preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: etiology and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49:612.
  50. Papanna R, Habli M, Baschat AA, et al. Cerclage for cervical shortening at fetoscopic laser photocoagulation in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:425.e1.
  51. Buskmiller C, Bergh EP, Brock C, et al. Interventions to prevent preterm delivery in women with short cervix before fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59:169.
  52. Snowise S, Mann LK, Moise KJ Jr, et al. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49:607.
  53. Stirnemann J, Djaafri F, Kim A, et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes is a collateral effect of improvement in perinatal outcomes following fetoscopic coagulation of chorionic vessels for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a retrospective observational study of 1092 cases. BJOG 2018; 125:1154.
  54. Papanna R, Molina S, Moise KY, et al. Chorioamnion plugging and the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes after laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35:337.
  55. Forde B, Lim FY, McKinney DN, et al. Association of amnioinfusion volume at the time of surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome and latency to delivery. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:1239.
  56. Papanna R, Mann LK, Moise KY, et al. Absorbable gelatin plug does not prevent iatrogenic preterm premature rupture of membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:456.
  57. Ortiz JU, Eixarch E, Peguero A, et al. Chorioamniotic membrane separation after fetoscopy in monochorionic twin pregnancy: incidence and impact on perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:345.
  58. Papanna R, Mann LK, Johnson A, et al. Chorioamnion separation as a risk for preterm premature rupture of membranes after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:771.
  59. Bergh EP, Moise KJ Jr, Johnson A, Papanna R. Pregnancy outcomes associated with chorioamnion membrane separation severity following fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:1020.
  60. Nassr AA, Hessami K, Shazly SA, et al. Perinatal outcomes of iatrogenic chorioamniotic separation following fetoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58:347.
  61. De Zoysa MY, Chon AH, Korst LM, et al. Membrane Separation and Perinatal Outcomes after Laser Treatment for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020; 47:307.
  62. Krispin E, Mustafa HJ, Sun RC, et al. Iatrogenic chorioamniotic separation and septostomy following fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59:506.
  63. Peeters SH, Stolk TT, Slaghekke F, et al. Iatrogenic perforation of intertwin membrane after laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:550.
  64. Brock CO, Bergh EP, Hernandez-Andrade EA, et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Septostomy during Fetoscopic Surgery for Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. J Clin Med 2021; 10.
  65. Cruz-Martinez R, Van Mieghem T, Lewi L, et al. Incidence and clinical implications of early inadvertent septostomy after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:458.
  66. Winer N, Salomon LJ, Essaoui M, et al. Pseudoamniotic band syndrome: a rare complication of monochorionic twins with fetofetal transfusion syndrome treated by laser coagulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:393.e1.
  67. Knijnenburg PJC, Slaghekke F, Tollenaar LSA, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcome of postprocedural amniotic band disruption sequence after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a large single-center case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:576.e1.
  68. Nassr AA, Hessami K, Shazly SA, et al. Perinatal outcome of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome complicated with incidental septostomy after laser photocoagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1568.
  69. Mustafa HJ, Javinani A, Goetzinger K, et al. Single fetal demise following fetoscopic ablation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome-cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:843.e1.
  70. Hoffman M, Habli M, Donepudi R, et al. Perinatal outcomes of single fetal survivor after fetal intervention for complicated monochorionic twins. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:511.
  71. Robyr R, Lewi L, Salomon LJ, et al. Prevalence and management of late fetal complications following successful selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:796.
  72. Donepudi R, Papanna R, Snowise S, et al. Does anemia-polycythemia complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome affect outcome after fetoscopic laser surgery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:340.
  73. Walsh CA, McAuliffe FM. Recurrent twin-twin transfusion syndrome after selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40:506.
  74. Fox CE, Chan BC, Cox P, et al. Reversed twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome following successful laser therapy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 26:115.
  75. Wee LY, Taylor MJ, Vanderheyden T, et al. Reversal of twin-twin transfusion syndrome: frequency, vascular anatomy, associated anomalies and outcome. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24:104.
  76. Gheorghe CP, Boring N, Mann L, et al. Neonatal Outcomes and Maternal Characteristics in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies: Uncomplicated versus Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Survivors after Fetoscopic Laser Surgery. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020; 47:165.
  77. Hessami K, Nassr AA, Sananès N, et al. Perinatal risk factors of neurodevelopmental impairment after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58:658.
  78. Lenclen R, Ciarlo G, Paupe A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in children born preterm treated by amnioreduction or fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison with dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:291.e1.
  79. Ortibus E, Lopriore E, Deprest J, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: a multicenter prospective cohort study from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:494.e1.
  80. Spruijt M, Steggerda S, Rath M, et al. Cerebral injury in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:15.
  81. Rossi AC, Vanderbilt D, Chmait RH. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1145.
  82. Vanderbilt DL, Schrager SM, Llanes A, Chmait RH. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral lesions in neonates after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:320.e1.
  83. Vanderbilt DL, Schrager SM, Llanes A, et al. Predictors of 2-year cognitive performance after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:388.e1.
  84. Brandsma FL, Spruijt MS, Rijken M, et al. Behavioural outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome survivors treated with laser surgery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2020; 105:304.
  85. Knijnenburg PJC, Spruijt MS, Jansen L, et al. Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of Preterm Born Survivors of Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: From Birth to 5 Years of Age. J Pediatr 2022; 240:51.
  86. Gijtenbeek M, Haak MC, Huberts TJP, et al. Perioperative fetal hemodynamic changes in twin-twin transfusion syndrome and neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:825.
  87. Sileo FG, Curado J, D'Antonio F, et al. Incidence and outcome of prenatal brain abnormality in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:176.
  88. Cheung YF, Taylor MJ, Fisk NM, et al. Fetal origins of reduced arterial distensibility in the donor twin in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Lancet 2000; 355:1157.
  89. Gardiner HM, Taylor MJ, Karatza A, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: the influence of intrauterine laser photocoagulation on arterial distensibility in childhood. Circulation 2003; 107:1906.
  90. Lenclen R, Paupe A, Ciarlo G, et al. Neonatal outcome in preterm monochorionic twins with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after intrauterine treatment with amnioreduction or fetoscopic laser surgery: comparison with dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:450.e1.
  91. Verbeek L, Joemmanbaks FA, Quak JME, et al. Renal function in neonates with twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with or without fetoscopic laser surgery. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176:1209.
  92. Beck M, Gräf C, Ellenrieder B, et al. Long-term outcome of kidney function after twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by intrauterine laser coagulation. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20:1657.
  93. Wohlmuth C, Gardiner HM, Diehl W, Hecher K. Fetal cardiovascular hemodynamics in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016; 95:664.
  94. Torres X, Bennasar M, Bautista-Rodríguez C, et al. The heart after surviving twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:502.e1.
  95. Moon-Grady AJ, Rand L, Lemley B, et al. Effect of selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome on pulmonary valve pathology in recipient twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:27.
  96. Herberg U, Gross W, Bartmann P, et al. Long term cardiac follow up of severe twin to twin transfusion syndrome after intrauterine laser coagulation. Heart 2006; 92:95.
  97. Pruetz JD, Sklansky M, Detterich J, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery: postnatal prevalence of congenital heart disease in surviving recipients and donors. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31:973.
  98. Springer S, Mlczoch E, Krampl-Bettelheim E, et al. Congenital heart disease in monochorionic twins with and without twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:994.
  99. Gijtenbeek M, Haak MC, Eschbach SJ, et al. Early postnatal cardiac follow-up of survivors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser coagulation. J Perinatol 2020; 40:1375.
  100. Herberg U, Bolay J, Graeve P, et al. Intertwin cardiac status at 10-year follow-up after intrauterine laser coagulation therapy of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison of donor, recipient and normal values. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99:F380.
  101. Vergote S, Lewi L, Gheysen W, et al. Subsequent fertility, pregnancy, and gynecologic outcomes after fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome compared with normal monochorionic twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218:447.e1.
  102. Bower SJ, Flack NJ, Sepulveda W, et al. Uterine artery blood flow response to correction of amniotic fluid volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:502.
  103. Urig MA, Clewell WH, Elliott JP. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:1522.
  104. Leung WC, Jouannic JM, Hyett J, et al. Procedure-related complications of rapid amniodrainage in the treatment of polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23:154.
  105. Mari G, Roberts A, Detti L, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome: results of the International Amnioreduction Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:708.
  106. Yinon Y, Ashwal E, Weisz B, et al. Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic twins: prediction of obstetric outcome and comparison of techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:670.
  107. Snowise S, Moise KJ, Johnson A, et al. Donor Death After Selective Fetoscopic Laser Surgery for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:74.
  108. Lewi L, Gratacos E, Ortibus E, et al. Pregnancy and infant outcome of 80 consecutive cord coagulations in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:782.
  109. Moise KJ Jr, Johnson A, Moise KY, Nickeleit V. Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in the complicated monochorionic gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:198.e1.
  110. Taylor MJ, Shalev E, Tanawattanacharoen S, et al. Ultrasound-guided umbilical cord occlusion using bipolar diathermy for Stage III/IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22:70.
  111. Robyr R, Yamamoto M, Ville Y. Selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies using ultrasound-guided bipolar cord coagulation. BJOG 2005; 112:1344.
  112. Mustafa HJ, Javinani A, Krispin E, et al. Perinatal outcomes of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome in triplet pregnancy: cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:42.
Topic 6793 Version 95.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟