ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Growth hormone treatment for children born small for gestational age

Growth hormone treatment for children born small for gestational age
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 31, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Growth hormone (GH) affects many of the metabolic processes carried out by somatic cells, the best known of which is the effect of increasing body mass. Although generalized growth is stimulated, it is not evenly distributed among the protein, lipid, and carbohydrate compartments. Body protein content increases, total body fat content falls, and an increase in plasma and liver lipid content occurs because of mobilization of free fatty acids from peripheral fat stores. The ability of insulin to promote fatty acid synthesis is antagonized by GH.

Most children who were born small for gestational age (SGA) have adequate catch-up growth without pharmacologic intervention. However, for a minority, treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) can augment growth.

The indications for and efficacy of rhGH treatment in children who were born SGA are reviewed here. The causes of and diagnostic approach to the child with short stature are discussed separately. (See "Causes of short stature" and "Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature".)

The use of rhGH for children with other conditions is addressed in separate topic reviews:

(See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children".)

(See "Growth hormone treatment for idiopathic short stature".)

(See "Growth failure in children with chronic kidney disease: Treatment with growth hormone".)

(See "Management of Turner syndrome in children and adolescents", section on 'Management of short stature'.)

(See "Prader-Willi syndrome: Management", section on 'Recombinant growth hormone treatment'.)

SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE INFANTS

Definition — Small for gestational age (SGA) is generally defined as a weight and/or length at birth that is 2 standard deviations (SD) or more below the mean for gestational age (ie, <-2 SD) [1]. This means that 2.3 percent of human infants are born SGA by this definition. Most, but not all, SGA infants (either term or premature) have sufficient postnatal catch-up growth to normalize their stature by two years of age [2,3]. Approximately 90 percent of term SGA infants display sufficient catch-up growth to attain a height above -2 SD by the age of 2 years, whereas 10 percent remain short throughout childhood and adolescence [4-6]. The terms fetal growth restriction and SGA have been used interchangeably in the literature, albeit there is a difference. Fetal growth restriction is a clinical definition that indicates that a neonate is born with clinical features of malnutrition and in utero growth compromise irrespective of birth weight and/or length percentiles, having deviated from the intrauterine growth curves. Many neonates with fetal growth restriction are also born SGA. Other aspects of the SGA infant and alternate definitions for SGA are discussed separately. (See "Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction".)

Fetal growth hormone physiology — Growth-restricted fetuses tend to hypersecrete GH. This may be the direct or indirect result of reduced negative feedback exerted by insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) that circulates in lower concentrations in growth-restricted fetuses. The endocrine milieu of the human fetus with growth restriction is characterized not only by low circulating insulin, IGF-1, IGF-2, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), but also by elevated IGFBP-1 and GH levels [7,8].

Hyperresponsiveness to GH-releasing factor also has been described in SGA infants [9]. This may reflect either deficient negative regulation or diminished feedback, as occurs in GH-resistant states such as undernutrition.

Intense activity of the somatotropic axis is thought to be one of the mechanisms driving the postnatal catch-up growth that occurs in the majority of SGA infants [9]. The role of the GH-IGF-1 axis in postnatal growth in children born SGA is unclear. One study suggests the presence of GH resistance with high levels of circulating GH and low levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 [10]. A separate report noted high circulating IGF-1 levels consistent with IGF-1 resistance [11].

Postnatal growth and development — During the first two years of life, most SGA children born preterm grow faster than children born full-term; this period of intense catch-up growth allows most to attain normal height by the age of two to four years [12]. A minority of SGA children born preterm have catch-up growth after two years of age [13,14]. They are often born prematurely as well.

Pubertal timing contributes to the association between SGA and short adult stature in some cases. In one study, girls born SGA were five months younger at pubertal onset and menarche as compared with girls with normal birth weight [15], and earlier puberty tends to lead to reduced adult height. This effect is particularly pronounced in girls who undergo postnatal catch-up growth in addition to being born SGA [16,17]. It remains unclear whether pharmacologic suppression of puberty enhances the effects of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment, as discussed below. (See 'Dosing and administration' below.)

Small for gestational age children without catch-up growth — Approximately 10 percent of children born SGA will remain short at two years of age (height <-2 SD, which corresponds to height less than the second percentile for age and sex). The mechanism underlying postnatal growth failure in these children is poorly understood. An irreversible deficit in cell number, inadequate calorie intake during the first years of life, and abnormalities in GH secretion have been hypothesized. Classic GH deficiency rarely is found in these children; however, there may be subtle abnormalities in the GH secretory pattern similar to those documented in adults during prolonged critical illness [18].

Regardless of the mechanism, it appears that the abnormal environmental conditions causing intrauterine growth restriction also can have long-lasting effects on growth and metabolism [19,20]. This altered programming may either alter the tempo of development or permanently reset homeostatic control [19]. (See "Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction", section on 'Adult chronic disorders'.)

In short SGA children, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels are low-normal for chronologic age, increase with high-dose recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy (77 mcg/kg per day), and decrease with the discontinuation of rhGH therapy [21].

Differential diagnosis — For SGA children without catch-up growth, the differential diagnosis includes Silver-Russell syndrome. Silver-Russell syndrome is a genetically heterogeneous syndrome characterized by intrauterine growth retardation leading to small size at birth, feeding difficulties during infancy and early childhood, severe short stature, body asymmetry, triangular face with prominent forehead, and several other minor anomalies [22,23]. A clinical scoring system helps to identify the subset of children born SGA who have Silver-Russell syndrome [24]. Individuals with Silver-Russell syndrome who are not treated with rhGH attain a mean adult height of -4.2 to -2.9 SD, representing severe short stature [25,26]. (See "Causes of short stature", section on 'Silver-Russell syndrome'.)

Other considerations include early intrauterine infections such as cytomegalovirus, rubella or toxoplasmosis, chromosomal abnormalities, and maternal substance abuse (including fetal alcohol syndrome).

GROWTH HORMONE TREATMENT — Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is a recognized therapy for children who are born small for gestational age (SGA) but who fail to have catch-up growth ("short SGA children") [1]. The effective doses of rhGH are higher than those for children with GH deficiency, suggesting relative GH and/or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) resistance.

Patients should be evaluated for other causes of growth failure before embarking on rhGH therapy. If another cause of growth failure is identified, management includes rhGH for some causes (eg, GH deficiency or Turner syndrome) and not for others. (See "Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature".)

Indications — In the United States, rhGH is approved for use in short SGA children whose length or height remains 2 standard deviations (SD) or more below the mean for age and sex at two years of age (ie, height <-2 SD) (algorithm 1) [13]. In Europe, rhGH is approved for SGA children whose height is 2.5 SD or more below the mean for age and sex at four years of age (ie, height <-2.5 SD), with low height velocity (ie, height velocity less than average for age) and low predicted height (1 SD or more below mid-parental height) [27,28].

In deciding whether to treat a short SGA child with rhGH, one should consider the expected growth response and its potential benefits to the child, as compared with the risks and psychosocial burden of prolonged treatment on the child and their family. The overall high cost of sustained treatment is also a reasonable consideration if the expected benefits are modest.

Growth response — The magnitude of the growth response to treatment depends on the rhGH dose [29], the age of the child (younger children are more responsive), and the family-corrected individual height deficit (children with a greater height deficit are more responsive) [30,31]. A mathematical model has been developed to help predict the response to rhGH treatment in these children [32].

There are few long-term follow-up studies of children with assessment of (near) adult height for children born SGA [33-37]. The information from these studies is limited because of variability in dose, duration of treatment, and the age that therapy was initiated. Nonetheless, an analysis of initial adult height outcomes from three randomized controlled trials revealed significant positive effects of rhGH therapy on adult height [38]. When rhGH therapy was initiated by eight years of age and continued for at least seven years, there was a treatment-induced increase in adult height of approximately 1 SD (approximately 6 cm). There were only modest advantages of a higher-dose regimen as compared with a lower-dose regimen (67 mcg/kg/day versus 33 mcg/kg/day); higher doses yield greater short-term growth responses but confer only modest advantages on long-term height outcomes. Children who are shorter at the start of rhGH therapy appear to benefit the most from the higher-dose regimen. Although early initiation of rhGH is optimal, one study suggests that later initiation of rhGH has some benefit on linear growth. Among children who started rhGH at a median age of 11.2 years, the median height increased from -2.9 SD at the start of treatment to -1.7 SD after reaching adult height [39]. Subsequent larger series confirm and extend these earlier reports [40].

Children with Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) also respond to rhGH therapy, but their adult height outcomes are somewhat less than for children born SGA but without SRS [36]. (See "Causes of short stature", section on 'Silver-Russell syndrome'.)

All short SGA children may benefit from rhGH therapy, whether or not they have GH deficiency. In a study of treatment with rhGH (3 or 6 international units/m2 per day [approximately 33 or 67 micrograms/kg/day] for an average of 7.8 years) in 54 short SGA children with or without GH deficiency, height was normalized in childhood followed by growth along the target height percentile [34]. The response to rhGH was independent of baseline endogenous GH secretion. The degree of response to rhGH therapy in SGA children without GH deficiency may have genetic determinants [41].

Treatment with rhGH may be less effective for short SGA children than for short children with normal birth weights. In the KIGS database (Kabi International Growth Study, now maintained by Pfizer), which contains information on a large cohort of children receiving rhGH therapy, the height gain during two years of treatment with rhGH was nearly 20 percent greater in children with normal birth weights than in those who had been SGA at birth [42]. The safety profile for rhGH treatment was similar among the two groups. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children".)

Dosing and administration — The optimal dose and duration of rhGH therapy have not been established, but the recommended dose range is 35 to 70 mcg/kg/day. In our practice, we begin rhGH therapy with approximately 40 mcg/kg/day based on ideal body weight, which is similar to the dose used for treatment of GH deficiency in children.

During rhGH therapy, we readjust doses to maintain IGF-1 levels in the upper one-half of the normal range (ie, 0 to +2 SD) for age and/or Tanner stage of development [43]. The rhGH dose should be lowered if serum IGF-1 levels rise above the normal range, as recommended in guidelines from the Pediatric Endocrine Society [44]. This helps to avoid very high IGF-1 levels, which are thought to be associated with some of the drug's toxicity. This strategy of IGF-1-based dosing has not been studied in children born SGA but is extrapolated from the approach that we use for children with GH deficiency, in whom it has been studied but is not an established practice. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Dose adjustment based on IGF-1 response'.)

Children should be monitored for evidence of complications of the treatment. Treatment is continued as long as the child is experiencing an accelerated growth rate compared with baseline or until the growth rate slows to less than 2 to 2.5 cm/year in late puberty. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Growth hormone treatment' and 'Monitoring' below.)

A number of studies have evaluated different approaches to therapy:

Dose effect – One study from Japan compared the effect of two doses of rhGH in short children born SGA, who were treated with either 33 mcg/kg/day or 67 mcg/kg/day [45]. The higher dose provided some advantage in height gain after five years of therapy but also a more rapid advancement of bone age, so the long-term effect of the higher dose on height is unclear.

Continuous versus discontinuous treatment – In a trial of rhGH treatment of short SGA children, 59 children between two and five years of age were randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens: four years of alternating treatment and observation (TOTO) or two years treatment followed by two years observation (TTOO) [46]. Height velocity and total height gain did not differ between the two groups, suggesting that interruption of treatment had no advantage.

Concomitant suppression of puberty – In children who are SGA, the onset of puberty may occur early [15,16,47]. Because earlier onset of puberty tends to lead to reduced adult height, these observations have led to attempts to suppress puberty during rhGH treatment. In a randomized trial in 32 children born SGA, combination treatment with rhGH and a gonadotropin hormone-releasing agonist (GnRHa), there was a considerable gain in predicted adult height (8 to 10 cm) during the three years of treatment [48], but the effect on adult height was modest (mean gain of 4.9 cm) [49]. Similarly, reports from observational studies of children treated with rhGH suggest that adding GnRHa to the rhGH treatment regimen provides minimal benefit or even reduces growth outcomes [50,51]. Although the latter studies are limited by lack of a randomized control group, these combination regimens cannot be generally recommended at present. To determine whether combined therapy is efficacious, larger randomized trials are needed, including a significant number of SGA children treated to near-adult height [1,40,52].

Safety — The safety of rhGH therapy depends upon the modality of treatment and the individual risk factors. To date, short-term observations during rhGH therapy in short children born SGA have established no specific safety issues compared with other groups of children treated with rhGH. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Adverse effects of growth hormone therapy'.)

Insulin resistance and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus — Individuals born SGA, especially those born at term, generally have reduced insulin sensitivity as compared with individuals with normal birth weight [53]. Because rhGH therapy also has been associated with increased insulin levels and insulin resistance, concerns have been raised that this population might have additive risks for insulin resistance during rhGH therapy.

Several trials and postmarketing studies have addressed this issue. These have shown mild and reversible decreases in insulin sensitivity during rhGH therapy, without impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus [54-59].

As an example, in an observational study of 389 children born SGA treated with rhGH in Spain, indices of insulin resistance increased slightly during the first year of rhGH treatment and then remained stable and within the normal range throughout follow-up (up to 10 years) [59]. Markers of metabolic health and safety during rhGH therapy are similar for patients with SRS compared with other children born SGA but without SRS [60].

Cardiovascular risk factors — Supraphysiologic levels of GH can cause adverse changes in blood pressure and lipid profiles, raising concerns about possible adverse effects of rhGH therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in children born SGA. However, these concerns have not been substantiated in clinical studies.

In a large randomized study, children born SGA had higher baseline systolic blood pressures than age- or height-matched controls [61]. rhGH therapy for six years resulted in normalization of the blood pressure in these children. Mean values for serum lipids and the atherogenic index were normal at baseline but also decreased during rhGH therapy as compared with a reference population of healthy children. There were no significant differences in these cardiovascular risk factors between children treated with rhGH doses of 3 international units/m2/day as compared with 6 international units/m2/day. Of note, 28 percent of children in this study were GH deficient in addition to being born SGA.

Long-term effects — Many studies have noted an association between intrauterine growth restriction and long-term health risks, including type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. However, the mechanisms underlying this association have not been established. (See "Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction", section on 'Outcomes'.)

Limited evidence suggests that rhGH therapy during childhood probably does not alter the long-term metabolic outcomes of individuals born SGA, at least up to early adulthood. In a longitudinal study from the Netherlands with 12 years of follow-up, individuals treated with rhGH during childhood had similar metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors around age 30 years compared with untreated controls born SGA, including indices of insulin sensitivity, fat mass, lipids, and blood pressure [62]. Regardless of rhGH treatment, individuals born SGA had somewhat higher concentrations of serum cholesterol and lower lean body mass compared with those born appropriate for gestational age, with no difference in abdominal adiposity, liver fat fraction, or blood pressure. While this study is reassuring, large longer-term studies are required to determine whether rhGH treatment during childhood affects cardiovascular events and other outcomes later in adulthood.

Evidence regarding the safety of rhGH treatment for individuals with GH deficiency is discussed separately. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Adverse effects of growth hormone therapy'.)

Monitoring — Therapy with rhGH should be initiated and monitored by a pediatric endocrinologist. Before rhGH is initiated, the child's blood pressure; IGF-1; insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3); and fasting lipids, insulin, and glucose should be measured [27]. During rhGH therapy, growth parameters, blood pressure and IGF-1 should be monitored. In our practice, we also monitor fasting insulin and glucose and serum lipids during rhGH therapy, based on the concern that GH tends to increase insulin resistance, although clinically significant increases in insulin resistance appear to be rare, as described in the section above [13,27]. (See 'Safety' above and "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Growth hormone treatment'.)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Growth hormone deficiency and other growth disorders".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions – Small for gestational age (SGA) is generally defined as a weight and/or length at birth that is 2 standard deviations (SD) or more below the mean for gestational age (ie, <-2 SD). Approximately 10 percent of children born SGA will remain short at two years of age. (See 'Definition' above and 'Small for gestational age children without catch-up growth' above.)

Indications and decisions about treatment

For children who were SGA at birth and who have not had adequate catch-up growth, we suggest treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) (algorithm 1) (Grade 2B). This suggestion assumes that the family has realistic understanding of the expected growth response and decides that this potential benefit outweighs the cost and burden of long-term treatment. Increases in short-term linear growth rates and in adult height have been shown in a variety of studies, but the treatment is costly and height outcomes are highly variable; the potential advantages and disadvantages of treatment should be considered on a case-by-case basis. (See 'Indications' above.)

The definition of adequate catch-up growth varies. In the United States, rhGH is approved for use in short SGA children whose height is 2 SD or more below the mean for age and sex at two years of age (ie, height <-2 SD) [13]. In Europe, the approved indication is for short SGA children whose height is <-2.5 SD at four years of age [27]. (See 'Indications' above.)

When treatment is contemplated, it is critical for the provider to discuss realistic expectations with the patient and family. Treatment with rhGH is likely to yield only modest gains in height compared with no treatment (an increase in adult height of approximately 6 cm, provided that the treatment is started early and continued for at least seven years). Adult height will usually be below average despite therapy. (See 'Growth response' above.)

Dosing – If treatment is chosen, we suggest beginning with rhGH doses similar to those used for treatment of GH deficiency in children, approximately 40 mcg/kg/day based on ideal body weight. During rhGH therapy, we readjust the rhGH dose to maintain insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels in the upper one-half of the normal range (ie, 0 to +2 SD). Children should be monitored for evidence of complications of the treatment. (See "Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children", section on 'Growth hormone treatment' and 'Dosing and administration' above and 'Monitoring' above.)

Outcomes – Treatment with rhGH yields the greatest increases in height when it is initiated by mid-childhood and continued for more than seven years. Children who are younger or shorter at the beginning of therapy have the greatest response as compared with untreated children. (See 'Growth response' above.)

Safety – Short children born SGA are at increased risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease when compared with children with normal birth weight. Whether treatment with rhGH either improves or exacerbates these long-term risks has not been established. However, there appear to be no differences in the short-term risks of rhGH treatment in this population compared with other children treated with rhGH. (See 'Safety' above.)

  1. Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, et al. Management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:804.
  2. Hokken-Koelega AC, De Ridder MA, Lemmen RJ, et al. Children born small for gestational age: do they catch up? Pediatr Res 1995; 38:267.
  3. Hediger ML, Overpeck MD, Maurer KR, et al. Growth of infants and young children born small or large for gestational age: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152:1225.
  4. Karlberg JP, Albertsson-Wikland K, Kwan EY, et al. The timing of early postnatal catch-up growth in normal, full-term infants born short for gestational age. Horm Res 1997; 48 Suppl 1:17.
  5. Karlberg J, Albertsson-Wikland K. Growth in full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: from birth to final height. Pediatr Res 1995; 38:733.
  6. Paz I, Seidman DS, Danon YL, et al. Are children born small for gestational age at increased risk of short stature? Am J Dis Child 1993; 147:337.
  7. Giudice LC, de Zegher F, Gargosky SE, et al. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the term and preterm human fetus and neonate with normal and extremes of intrauterine growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80:1548.
  8. Leger J, Noel M, Limal JM, Czernichow P. Growth factors and intrauterine growth retardation. II. Serum growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, and IGF-binding protein 3 levels in children with intrauterine growth retardation compared with normal control subjects: prospective study from birth to two years of age. Study Group of IUGR. Pediatr Res 1996; 40:101.
  9. Deiber M, Chatelain P, Naville D, et al. Functional hypersomatotropism in small for gestational age (SGA) newborn infants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 68:232.
  10. van Dijk M, Mulder P, Houdijk M, et al. High serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) during high-dose GH treatment in short children born small for gestational age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:1390.
  11. Iñiguez G, Ong K, Bazaes R, et al. Longitudinal changes in insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin sensitivity, and secretion from birth to age three years in small-for-gestational-age children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:4645.
  12. Olbertz DM, Mumm R, Wittwer-Backofen U, et al. Identification of growth patterns of preterm and small-for-gestational age children from birth to 4 years - do they catch up? J Perinat Med 2019; 47:448.
  13. Lee PA, Chernausek SD, Hokken-Koelega AC, et al. International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001. Pediatrics 2003; 111:1253.
  14. Wit JM, Finken MJ, Rijken M, de Zegher F. Preterm growth restraint: a paradigm that unifies intrauterine growth retardation and preterm extrauterine growth retardation and has implications for the small-for-gestational-age indication in growth hormone therapy. Pediatrics 2006; 117:e793.
  15. Persson I, Ahlsson F, Ewald U, et al. Influence of perinatal factors on the onset of puberty in boys and girls: implications for interpretation of link with risk of long term diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150:747.
  16. Proos L, Gustafsson J. Is early puberty triggered by catch-up growth following undernutrition? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012; 9:1791.
  17. Papadimitriou A, Nicolaidou P, Fretzayas A, Chrousos GP. Clinical review: Constitutional advancement of growth, a.k.a. early growth acceleration, predicts early puberty and childhood obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:4535.
  18. Van den Berghe G, de Zegher F, Lauwers P, Veldhuis JD. Growth hormone secretion in critical illness: effect of dopamine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 79:1141.
  19. Gluckman PD, Cutfield W, Harding JE, et al. Metabolic consequences of intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1996; 417:3.
  20. Dennison E, Fall C, Cooper C, Barker D. Prenatal factors influencing long-term outcome. Horm Res 1997; 48 Suppl 1:25.
  21. de Zegher F, Du Caju MV, Heinrichs C, et al. Early, discontinuous, high dose growth hormone treatment to normalize height and weight of short children born small for gestational age: results over 6 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:1558.
  22. SILVER HK, KIYASU W, GEORGE J, DEAMER WC. Syndrome of congenital hemihypertrophy, shortness of stature, and elevated urinary gonadotropins. Pediatrics 1953; 12:368.
  23. Wakeling EL, Brioude F, Lokulo-Sodipe O, et al. Diagnosis and management of Silver-Russell syndrome: first international consensus statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017; 13:105.
  24. Azzi S, Salem J, Thibaud N, et al. A prospective study validating a clinical scoring system and demonstrating phenotypical-genotypical correlations in Silver-Russell syndrome. J Med Genet 2015; 52:446.
  25. Wollmann HA, Kirchner T, Enders H, et al. Growth and symptoms in Silver-Russell syndrome: review on the basis of 386 patients. Eur J Pediatr 1995; 154:958.
  26. Toumba M, Albanese A, Azcona C, Stanhope R. Effect of long-term growth hormone treatment on final height of children with Russell-Silver syndrome. Horm Res Paediatr 2010; 74:212.
  27. Johnston LB, Savage MO. Should recombinant human growth hormone therapy be used in short small for gestational age children? Arch Dis Child 2004; 89:740.
  28. Chernausek SD. Treatment of short children born small for gestational age: US perspective, 2005. Horm Res 2005; 64 Suppl 2:63.
  29. de Zegher F, Albertsson-Wikland K, Wilton P, et al. Growth hormone treatment of short children born small for gestational age: metanalysis of four independent, randomized, controlled, multicentre studies. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1996; 417:27.
  30. Albanese A, Stanhope R. GH treatment induces sustained catch-up growth in children with intrauterine growth retardation: 7-year results. Horm Res 1997; 48:173.
  31. Boguszewski M, Albertsson-Wikland K, Aronsson S, et al. Growth hormone treatment of short children born small-for-gestational-age: the Nordic Multicentre Trial. Acta Paediatr 1998; 87:257.
  32. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Cowell CT, et al. Prediction of response to growth hormone treatment in short children born small for gestational age: analysis of data from KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:125.
  33. Hokken-Koelega AC, van Pareren Y, Sas T, Arends N. Final height data, body composition and glucose metabolism in growth hormone-treated short children born small for gestational age. Horm Res 2003; 60 Suppl 3:113.
  34. Van Pareren Y, Mulder P, Houdijk M, et al. Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:3584.
  35. Dahlgren J, Wikland KA, Swedish Study Group for Growth Hormone Treatment. Final height in short children born small for gestational age treated with growth hormone. Pediatr Res 2005; 57:216.
  36. Smeets CC, Zandwijken GR, Renes JS, Hokken-Koelega AC. Long-Term Results of GH Treatment in Silver-Russell Syndrome (SRS): Do They Benefit the Same as Non-SRS Short-SGA? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2105.
  37. Thomas M, Beckers D, Brachet C, et al. Adult Height after Growth Hormone Treatment at Pubertal Onset in Short Adolescents Born Small for Gestational Age: Results from a Belgian Registry-Based Study. Int J Endocrinol 2018; 2018:6421243.
  38. de Zegher F, Hokken-Koelega A. Growth hormone therapy for children born small for gestational age: height gain is less dose dependent over the long term than over the short term. Pediatrics 2005; 115:e458.
  39. Lem AJ, van der Kaay DC, de Ridder MA, et al. Adult height in short children born SGA treated with growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog: results of a randomized, dose-response GH trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97:4096.
  40. Renes JS, Willemsen RH, Mulder JC, et al. New insights into factors influencing adult height in short SGA children: Results of a large multicentre growth hormone trial. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2015; 82:854.
  41. Dos Santos C, Essioux L, Teinturier C, et al. A common polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor is associated with increased responsiveness to growth hormone. Nat Genet 2004; 36:720.
  42. De Zegher F, Chatelain PG. Growth hormone treatment of short children born small for gestational age: Epianaylsis of controlled studies and clinical experience. In: Progress in Growth Hormone Therapy-10 Years of KIGS, Ranke M, Wilton P (Eds), J and J Verlag, Mannheim 1998.
  43. Collett-Solberg PF, Ambler G, Backeljauw PF, et al. Diagnosis, Genetics, and Therapy of Short Stature in Children: A Growth Hormone Research Society International Perspective. Horm Res Paediatr 2019; 92:1.
  44. Grimberg A, DiVall SA, Polychronakos C, et al. Guidelines for Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Treatment in Children and Adolescents: Growth Hormone Deficiency, Idiopathic Short Stature, and Primary Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Deficiency. Horm Res Paediatr 2016; 86:361.
  45. Horikawa R, Tanaka T, Nishinaga H, et al. Evaluation of growth hormone treatment efficacy in short Japanese children born small for gestational age: Five-year treatment outcome and impact on puberty. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2017; 26:63.
  46. Simon D, Leger J, Fjellestad-Paulsen A, et al. Intermittent recombinant growth hormone treatment in short children born small for gestational age: four-year results of a randomized trial of two different treatment regimens. Horm Res 2006; 66:118.
  47. Preece MA. Puberty in children with intrauterine growth retardation. Horm Res 1997; 48 Suppl 1:30.
  48. Kamp GA, Mul D, Waelkens JJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of three years growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in children with idiopathic short stature and intrauterine growth retardation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:2969.
  49. van Gool SA, Kamp GA, Visser-van Balen H, et al. Final height outcome after three years of growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in short adolescents with relatively early puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:1402.
  50. Reiter EO, Lindberg A, Ranke MB, et al. The KIGS experience with the addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists to growth hormone (GH) treatment of children with idiopathic GH deficiency. Horm Res 2003; 60:68.
  51. Carel JC. Management of short stature with GnRH agonist and co-treatment with growth hormone: a controversial issue. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2006; 254-255:226.
  52. Carel JC, Eugster EA, Rogol A, et al. Consensus statement on the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in children. Pediatrics 2009; 123:e752.
  53. Woods KA, van Helvoirt M, Ong KK, et al. The somatotropic axis in short children born small for gestational age: relation to insulin resistance. Pediatr Res 2002; 51:76.
  54. Cutfield WS, Lindberg A, Rapaport R, et al. Safety of growth hormone treatment in children born small for gestational age: the US trial and KIGS analysis. Horm Res 2006; 65 Suppl 3:153.
  55. Tanaka T, Fujieda K, Yokoya S, et al. Efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in children born small for gestational age in Japan. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2008; 21:423.
  56. Bachmann S, Bechtold S, Bonfig W, et al. Insulin sensitivity decreases in short children born small for gestational age treated with growth hormone. J Pediatr 2009; 154:509.
  57. Poidvin A, Weill A, Ecosse E, et al. Risk of Diabetes Treated in Early Adulthood After Growth Hormone Treatment of Short Stature in Childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:1291.
  58. Jensen RB, Thankamony A, O'Connell SM, et al. Baseline IGF-I levels determine insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity during the first year on growth hormone therapy in children born small for gestational age. Results from a North European Multicentre Study (NESGAS). Horm Res Paediatr 2013; 80:38.
  59. López-Siguero JP, Martínez-Aedo MJ, Bermúdez de la Vega JA, et al. Growth hormone treatment does not to lead to insulin resistance nor excessive rise in IGF-1 levels, while improving height in patients small for gestational age A long-term observational study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2022; 96:558.
  60. Smeets CC, Renes JS, van der Steen M, Hokken-Koelega AC. Metabolic Health and Long-Term Safety of Growth Hormone Treatment in Silver-Russell Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:983.
  61. Sas T, Mulder P, Hokken-Koelega A. Body composition, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism before and during long-term growth hormone (GH) treatment in children with short stature born small for gestational age either with or without GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85:3786.
  62. Goedegebuure WJ, van der Steen M, Smeets CCJ, Hokken-Koelega ACS. Childhood growth hormone treatment and metabolic and cardiovascular risk in adults born small for gestational age after growth hormone cessation in the Netherlands: a 12-year follow-up study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022; 6:777.
Topic 5833 Version 19.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟