ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Conventional indications versus modern approach to treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases

Conventional indications versus modern approach to treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases
Conventional indications Modern aggressive approach
<4 metastases, unilobar disease No limits. Multiple/bilobar metastases acceptable, using neoadjuvant chemotherapy, staged resection, and resection/local ablative therapy.
Size <5 cm No limits
No extrahepatic disease Pulmonary metastases can be resected
Resection margin >1 cm Resection margin <1 cm managed with ablative treatment of narrow margin (cryosurgery or radiofrequency ablation)
Adequate remnant liver parenchyma Preoperative portal vein embolization to increase liver remnant volume
Resection of all macroscopic disease NED can be achieved with combination of resection and local ablative therapy
No metachronous liver metastases Synchronous and metachronous metastases acceptable
Absence of vena cava and hepatic vein confluence invasion No limits. Caval/hepatic vein resection with reconstruction can be performed
Absence of hepatic pedicle lymph node metastases In absence of celiac axis metastases, hepatic pedicle lymph node metastases may be resected for improved 3-year survival
Mod_approach_surg_CRC_mets.htm
NED: No evidence of disease.
Reproduced with permission from: Khatri VP, Petrelli NJ, Belghiti J. Extending the frontiers of surgical therapy for hepatic colorectal metastases: is there a limit? J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8490. Copyright © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Graphic 52622 Version 3.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟