ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Denosumab: Drug information

Denosumab: Drug information
(For additional information see "Denosumab: Patient drug information" and see "Denosumab: Pediatric drug information")

For abbreviations, symbols, and age group definitions used in Lexicomp (show table)
Special Alerts
Risk of Severe Hypocalcemia in Patients on Dialysis: Safety Alert January 2024

The FDA is adding a Boxed Warning to the Prolia (denosumab) prescribing information concerning the significant risk of developing severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly patients on dialysis. Severe hypocalcemia appears to be more common in patients with CKD who also have mineral and bone disorder. In patients with advanced CKD taking Prolia, severe hypocalcemia resulted in serious harm, including hospitalization, life-threatening events, and death. Severe hypocalcemia can be asymptomatic or may present as confusion; seizures; arrhythmias; fainting; face twitching; uncontrolled muscle spasms; or weakness, tingling, or numbness in parts of the body. In addition to the Boxed Warning, the prescribing information will be updated to include information on how to reduce the risk of hypocalcemia, including appropriate patient selection for Prolia treatment, monitoring of calcium levels, and other strategies. The updated safety information will also be incorporated into the Medication Guide and the Prolia Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS).

Further information can be found at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease

Brand Names: US
  • Prolia;
  • Xgeva
Brand Names: Canada
  • Prolia;
  • Xgeva
Pharmacologic Category
  • Bone-Modifying Agent;
  • Monoclonal Antibody
Dosing: Adult

Dosage guidance:

Clinical considerations: Correct hypocalcemia and vitamin D deficiency (eg, to a 25-hydroxyvitamin D level ≥20 ng/mL [≥50 nmol/L]), when appropriate, before initiation, and ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake during therapy (Ref).

Bone metastases from solid tumors

Bone metastases from solid tumors (prevention of skeletal-related events; Xgeva): SUBQ: 120 mg every 4 weeks (Ref).

Giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (Xgeva): SUBQ: 120 mg once every 4 weeks; during the first month, give an additional 120 mg on days 8 and 15 (Ref).

Hypercalcemia of malignancy

Hypercalcemia of malignancy (albumin-corrected serum calcium ≥12 mg/dL [≥3 mmol/L]) (alternative agent):

Note: For use in patients with hypercalcemia that is refractory to bisphosphonates, or in patients in whom bisphosphonates cannot be taken. Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with chronic hypercalcemia may not require immediate treatment unless albumin-corrected serum calcium level is >14 mg/dL (>3.5 mmol/L) (Ref).

SUBQ (Xgeva): 120 mg once weekly for up to 3 doses; if the cause of hypercalcemia persists, may continue at 120 mg every 4 weeks starting 2 weeks after the initial 3 weekly doses (Ref). Note: In patients with contraindications to bisphosphonates (eg, severe kidney impairment, bisphosphonate allergy), some experts administer a single dose of 60 mg; monitor carefully in patients with kidney impairment due to high risk of hypocalcemia in this setting (Ref).

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (prevention of skeletal-related events; Xgeva): SUBQ: 120 mg every 4 weeks (Ref). Denosumab has a reversible mechanism of action and therefore should not be discontinued abruptly (Ref).

Osteoporosis/bone loss

Osteoporosis/bone loss (Prolia):

Androgen deprivation therapy-induced bone loss in males with prostate cancer, treatment: SUBQ: 60 mg once every 6 months (Ref).

Aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss in females with breast cancer, treatment: SUBQ: 60 mg once every 6 months (Ref).

Osteoporosis, fracture risk reduction (males and postmenopausal females) (alternative agent):

Note: For use in patients in whom first-line therapies are ineffective or cannot be used, or as an alternative antiresorptive agent following anabolic therapy (Ref). Therapy following discontinuation must be well-coordinated; avoid use in patients who have difficulty adhering to medication or appointment schedules (Ref). Prior to use, evaluate and treat any potential causes of secondary osteoporosis (eg, severe vitamin D deficiency) (Ref).

SUBQ: 60 mg once every 6 months.

Duration of therapy: The optimal duration of therapy has not been established. If fracture risk remains high after 5 to 10 years of therapy, consider extending therapy or switching to alternative therapy (eg, a bisphosphonate); there are no data on use beyond 10 years (Ref).

Discontinuation/interruption of therapy: Discontinuation or interruption (eg, >1 month beyond next scheduled dose) of denosumab should not occur without subsequent antiresorptive therapy (eg, with a bisphosphonate) due to increased risk of vertebral fracture; drug holidays are not recommended (Ref).

Missed dose: If a dose is missed, administer as soon as possible; fracture risk may be increased if dose is not administered within 7 months of prior dose (Ref). Thereafter, schedule doses every 6 months from the date of the last injection.

Osteoporosis, glucocorticoid-induced (males and females): SUBQ: 60 mg once every 6 months (Ref).

Bone destruction caused by rheumatoid arthritis

Bone destruction caused by rheumatoid arthritis (off-label use; based on limited data): SUBQ: 60 mg or 180 mg as a single dose and repeated at 6 months (in combination with continued methotrexate); a total of 2 doses was administered in the study (Ref).

Dosage adjustment for concomitant therapy: Significant drug interactions exist, requiring dose/frequency adjustment or avoidance. Consult drug interactions database for more information.

Dosing: Kidney Impairment: Adult

The renal dosing recommendations are based upon the best available evidence and clinical expertise. Senior Editorial Team: Bruce Mueller, PharmD, FCCP, FASN, FNKF; Jason Roberts, PhD, BPharm (Hons), B App Sc, FSHP, FISAC; Michael Heung, MD, MS.

Note: Monitor patients with severe impairment (CrCl <30 mL/minute or on dialysis) closely, as significant and prolonged hypocalcemia (incidence of 29% and potentially lasting weeks to months) and marked elevations of serum parathyroid hormone are serious risks in this population (Ref). Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake/supplementation.

Altered kidney function:

CrCl ≥30 mL/minute: No dosage adjustment necessary.

CrCl <30 mL/minute:

Prolia: No dosage adjustment necessary; use in conjunction with guidance from patient's nephrology team, as osteoporosis is difficult to distinguish from chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (Ref). The risk of Prolia administration must be weighed against the accuracy of the diagnosis of the underlying bone disease (Ref).

Xgeva: There are no specific dosage adjustments recommended. Guidelines suggest dosage adjustment is not necessary; close monitoring for hypocalcemia is recommended (Ref).

Hemodialysis, intermittent (thrice weekly): Unlikely to be removed by hemodialysis (Ref); dose as for patients with CrCl <30 mL/minute; use with caution and monitor calcium levels closely, with appropriate adjustment in dialysate calcium concentration in addition to adequate calcium and active vitamin D supplementation (Ref).

Peritoneal dialysis: Unlikely to be removed by peritoneal dialysis (Ref); dose as for patients with CrCl <30 mL/minute; use with caution and monitor calcium levels closely.

Dosing: Hepatic Impairment: Adult

There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer's labeling (has not been studied).

Dosing: Older Adult

Refer to adult dosing.

Dosing: Pediatric

(For additional information see "Denosumab: Pediatric drug information")

Dosage guidance:

Clinical considerations: Administer calcium and vitamin D as necessary to prevent or treat hypocalcemia.

Giant cell tumor of the bone, treatment

Giant cell tumor of the bone, treatment: Xgeva: Adolescents (skeletally mature) weighing ≥45 kg: SubQ: 120 mg once every 4 weeks; during the first month, give an additional dose of 120 mg on days 8 and 15 (Ref).

Dosage adjustment for concomitant therapy: Significant drug interactions exist, requiring dose/frequency adjustment or avoidance. Consult drug interactions database for more information.

Dosing: Kidney Impairment: Pediatric

Monitor patients with severe impairment (CrCl <30 mL/minute or on dialysis) due to increased risk of hypocalcemia.

Xgeva: There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer's labeling; however, in studies of patients with varying degrees of renal impairment, the degree of renal impairment had no effect on denosumab pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Dosing: Hepatic Impairment: Pediatric

There are no dosage adjustments provided in manufacturer's labeling (has not been studied).

Adverse Reactions (Significant): Considerations
Fracture

Atypical femur fracture (AFF) has been reported in patients receiving denosumab for both treatment of osteoporosis as well as in cancer settings (Ref). The fractures may occur anywhere along the femoral shaft (may be bilateral) and commonly occur with minimal to no trauma to the area. Some patients experience prodromal thigh or groin pain weeks or months before the fracture occurs. Contralateral limb should be assessed if AFF occurs. Multiple vertebral column fracture has been reported following discontinuation of therapy (Ref).

Mechanism: Time-related; exact mechanism is not fully understood (Ref).

AFF: AFF are considered stress or insufficiency fractures that develop over time. Antiresorptive agents, including denosumab, suppress bone remodeling which results in increased skeletal fragility and may allow stress fractures to grow to critical size (Ref).

Multiple vertebral column fracture: Discontinuation of therapy results in a rapid, profound increase of bone resorption and loss of bone mineral density, which has been associated with increased risk of rebound-associated multiple vertebral fractures (Ref).

Onset: Delayed; according to the manufacturer, multiple vertebral column fracture has been reported an average of 17 months (range: 7 months to 43 months) after the last dose. Similarly, a few studies report a range of 8 months to 16 months after the last dose (Ref).

Risk factors:

AFF:

• Duration of therapy; in general, long durations (eg, >5 years) of antiresorptive medications are associated with an increased risk of AFF (Ref). The duration of denosumab therapy associated with an increased risk has not been fully elucidated; treatment up to 10 years continues to be associated with a favorable skeletal benefit/risk profile (Ref)

• Prior history of AFF (Ref)

• Patients of Asian descent (Ref)

• Bowed femora (Ref)

• Varus femoral neck/shaft angle (Ref)

• Presence of prodromal symptoms (eg, thigh or groin pain) or signs of early fracture line or periosteal reaction on image of femur (Ref)

• Concurrent use of glucocorticoids for >6 months (Ref)

• Prior long-term use of oral or IV bisphosphonates (Ref)

• Active rheumatoid arthritis (Ref)

• Females (Ref)

• Low serum hydroxyl-vitamin D concentrations (eg, <16 ng/mL) (Ref)

Vertebral column fracture:

• Prior history of vertebral fracture

• Discontinuation of therapy

Hypocalcemia

Denosumab may cause or exacerbate hypocalcemia; severe hypocalcemia (symptomatic cases, including fatalities) has been reported (Ref). Patients may experience a single hypocalcemic episode or recurrent hypocalcemia with subsequent doses (Ref). Resolution (with calcium supplementation) usually occurs within ~30 days (Ref).

Mechanism: Dose-related; related to the pharmacologic action. Denosumab inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption which causes an imbalance of osteoclast and osteoblastic activity reducing the amount of skeletal calcium released into circulation (Ref).

Onset: Varied; Usually occurs ~1 to 2 weeks after treatment initiation; however, a delayed onset (several months after treatment initiation) has also occurred (Ref). Hypocalcemia may appear after the first dose of denosumab (Ref).

Risk factors:

• Preexisting hypocalcemia

• Kidney dysfunction; risk increases with degree of impairment (especially patients with CrCl <30 mL/minute and/or on dialysis with inadequate/no calcium supplementation) (Ref). These patients may also develop marked elevations of serum parathyroid hormone. Concomitant use of calcimimetic medications may worsen hypocalcemia.

• Patients predisposed to hypocalcemia or disturbances of mineral metabolism (eg, hypoparathyroidism, thyroid surgery, parathyroid surgery, malabsorption syndromes, excision of small intestine)

• Bone metastases (especially in patients with prostate cancer or small-cell lung cancer as the primary tumor type); risk increases with the number of bone metastases (Ref)

• Osteoblastic bone metastases (Ref)

• Concurrent use of other calcium-lowering agents

• Patients with high bone turnover (eg, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, total N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen [P1NP], tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b [TRACP-5b], urinary cross-linked N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen [NTX]) (Ref)

• Males (may be related to higher risk of hypocalcemia in patients with prostate cancer) (Ref)

• No prior zoledronic acid administration (Ref)

Infection

An increased incidence of infection (including serious infection) has been demonstrated with denosumab, mainly secondary to an increased risk of ear, nose, and throat infections (eg, pharyngitis, nasopharyngitis, sinusitis, otitis media, labyrinthitis) and GI infections (eg, gastroenteritis, diverticulitis, H. pylori gastritis, cholecystitis, appendicitis, C. difficile-associated disease) (Ref). Cases of kidney and urinary tract infection, serious skin infections, and endocarditis have also been reported (Ref).

Mechanism: Non-dose-related; idiosyncratic; exact mechanism unknown. Denosumab inhibits RANKL which can be found on cells of the immune system including activated T lymphocytes, B cells, dendritic cells, and monocyte-macrophages; therefore, RANKL inhibition may alter immune function (Ref).

Onset: Not well defined. In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, a higher incidence of infection was evident in treatment duration of ≥12 months but not in shorter exposures (Ref). In contrast, an analysis of data from the FREEDOM trial did not find a change in the rate of infection with increasing duration of denosumab treatment (Ref).

Risk factors:

• Impaired immune system

• Concurrent use of immunosuppressive therapy (Ref)

• Venous ulcers (risk factor for skin infection) (Ref)

• Skin wounds (risk factor for skin infection) (Ref)

Osteonecrosis of the jaw

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), also referred to as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), has been reported in patients receiving denosumab and is characterized by nonhealing exposed or necrotic bone in the maxillofacial region (Ref). ONJ may manifest as jaw pain, osteomyelitis, osteitis, bone erosion, tooth/periodontal infection, toothache, or gingival ulceration/erosion (Ref). Risk of ONJ is increased with intravenous antiresorptive therapy (ie, denosumab) as compared to the risk associated with oral bisphosphonate use (Ref).

Mechanism: Dose- and time-related; exact mechanism unknown. Leading hypotheses include oversuppression of bone turnover or remodeling, inhibition of blood supply, constant microtrauma, and infection/inflammation (Ref).

Onset: Delayed; in one combined analysis of patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies reported that ONJ occurred from 4 to 30 months after treatment initiation (median: 14 months). Resolution occurred in 40.4% of patients and median time to resolution was ~8 months (Ref).

Risk factors:

• Invasive dental procedures (eg, tooth extraction, dental implants, oral surgery) (Ref)

• Local infection with delayed healing

• Cancer diagnosis (as compared to patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis, regardless of medication used or dosing schedule) (Ref)

In studies of patients with cancer, a longer duration of denosumab exposure was associated with a higher incidence of ONJ, although a majority of patients had predisposing factors, including a history of poor oral hygiene, tooth extraction, or the use of a dental appliance.

• Duration of therapy (risk may plateau at 2 to 3 years of treatment with denosumab) (Ref)

• Higher doses (eg, doses used in cancer settings) (Ref)

• Concurrent use of certain medications (eg, immunosuppressive therapy, angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, chemotherapy, systemic corticosteroids, hormone therapy, erythropoietin) (Ref)

• Poor oral hygiene (Ref)

• Use of a dental appliance (Ref)

• Ill-fitting dentures (Ref)

• Periodontal and/or other preexisting dental disease

• Diabetes (Ref)

• Anemia (Ref)

• Coagulopathy

• Tobacco use (Ref)

• Hyperthyroidism (Ref)

• Dialysis (Ref)

• Older adults (Ref)

Adverse Reactions

The following adverse drug reactions and incidences are derived from product labeling unless otherwise specified. Incidences with Prolia (60 mg every 6 months) or Xgeva (120 mg every 4 weeks).

>10%:

Cardiovascular: Peripheral edema (Prolia: 5%; Xgeva: 17%)

Dermatologic: Dermatitis (Prolia: ≤11%), eczema (Prolia: ≤11%), skin rash (≤14%)

Endocrine & metabolic: Hypocalcemia (Prolia: 2%, including severe hypocalcemia; Xgeva: 18%, severe hypocalcemia: 3% (table 1); postmarketing literature suggests a higher incidence of ~40% [Manzaneque 2017]) (table 2), hypophosphatemia (Xgeva: 32%; severe: 15% to 21%)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Severe Hypocalcemia

Drug (Denosumab)

Comparator (Zoledronic acid)

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Zoledronic acid)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Zoledronic acid)

Comment

3%

1%

120 mg every 4 weeks

4 mg/4 weeks

Bone metastasis from solid tumors

2,841

2,836

Severe hypocalcemia was defined as corrected serum calcium <7 mg/dL

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Hypocalcemia

Drug (Denosumab)

Placebo

Comparator (Zoledronic acid)

Population

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Zoledronic acid)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Placebo or comparator)

2%

0.4%

N/A

Female

60 mg every 6 months

N/A

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

N/A

N/A

2%

0%

N/A

N/A

60 mg every 6 months

N/A

Bone loss in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer or adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer

731

725

18%

N/A

9%

N/A

120 mg every 4 weeks

4 mg/4 weeks

Bone metastasis from solid tumors

2,841

2,836

Gastrointestinal: Diarrhea (Xgeva: 20% to 34%), nausea (Xgeva: 31% to 32%)

Hematologic & oncologic: Anemia (Xgeva: 22%), thrombocytopenia (Xgeva: 19%)

Nervous system: Fatigue (Xgeva: ≤45%), headache (Prolia: 4%; Xgeva: 11% to 13%)

Neuromuscular & skeletal: Arthralgia (Prolia: 7% to 14%), asthenia (Xgeva: ≤45%), back pain (Prolia: 5% to 12%; Xgeva: 21%), limb pain (Prolia: 10% to 12%)

Respiratory: Cough (Xgeva: 15%), dyspnea (Xgeva: 21%), upper respiratory tract infection (Prolia: 3% to 5%; Xgeva: 15%) (table 3)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

Drug (Denosumab)

Placebo

Comparator (Bisphosphonate)

Population

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Bisphosphonate)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Placebo or comparator)

5%

4%

N/A

Female

60 mg every 6 months

N/A

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

3,886

3,876

3%

N/A

3%

N/A

60 mg every 6 months

5 mg/day

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

394

384

1% to 10%:

Cardiovascular: Angina pectoris (Prolia: 3%), hypertension (Prolia: 4%)

Endocrine & metabolic: Hypercholesterolemia (Prolia: 7%)

Gastrointestinal: Constipation (Prolia: 3%), dyspepsia (Prolia: 3%), flatulence (Prolia: 2%), upper abdominal pain (Prolia: 3%), vomiting (Prolia 3%)

Genitourinary: Urinary tract infection (Prolia: 3%) (table 4)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Urinary Tract Infection

Drug (Denosumab)

Comparator (Bisphosphonate)

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Bisphosphonate)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Bisphosphonate)

3%

2%

60 mg every 6 months

5 mg/day

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

394

384

Hematologic & oncologic: Malignant neoplasm (Prolia: new; 3% to 5%)

Infection: Serious infection (Prolia: 4%) (table 5)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Serious Infection

Drug (Denosumab)

Comparator (Bisphosphonate)

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Bisphosphonate)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Bisphosphonate)

4%

4%

60 mg every 6 months

5 mg/day

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

394

384

Nervous system: Dizziness (Prolia: 2%), falling (Prolia: 2%), sciatica (Prolia: 5%)

Neuromuscular & skeletal: Musculoskeletal pain (Prolia: 6%), myalgia (Prolia: 3%), ostealgia (Prolia: 4%), osteonecrosis of the jaw (Prolia: <1%; Xgeva: 2%) (table 6), polymyalgia rheumatica (Prolia: 2%), vertebral column fracture (following discontinuation: Prolia: 3% to 6%)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Drug (Denosumab)

Comparator (Zoledronic acid)

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Zoledronic acid)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Zoledronic acid)

2%

1%

120 mg every 4 weeks

4 mg/4 weeks

Bone metastasis from solid tumors

2,841

2,836

Ophthalmic: Cataract (Prolia: 5%)

Respiratory: Bronchitis (Prolia: 4%) (table 7), nasopharyngitis (Prolia: 7%) (table 8), pneumonia (Xgeva: 8%)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Bronchitis

Drug (Denosumab)

Comparator (Bisphosphonate)

Dose (Denosumab)

Dose (Bisphosphonate)

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Bisphosphonate)

4%

3%

60 mg every 6 months

5 mg/day

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

394

384

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Nasopharyngitis

Drug (Denosumab)

Placebo

Population

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Placebo)

7%

6%

Male

Osteoporosis

120

120

<1%:

Cardiovascular: Endocarditis (Prolia) (table 9)

Denosumab: Adverse Reaction: Endocarditis

Drug (Denosumab)

Placebo

Population

Indication

Number of Patients (Denosumab)

Number of Patients (Placebo)

0.1%

0%

Female

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

3,886

3,876

Immunologic: Antibody development

Postmarketing (all formulations):

Cardiovascular: Vasculitis (Sanchez 2019)

Dermatologic: Alopecia (Lyakhovitsky 2016), erythema of skin, facial swelling (Gutiérrez-Fernández 2015), lichenoid eruption (King 2018), urticaria (Gutiérrez-Fernández 2015)

Endocrine & Metabolic: Hyperparathyroidism (Mazokopakis 2018)

Hepatic: Hepatotoxicity (Malnick 2017)

Hypersensitivity: Anaphylaxis

Immunologic: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (Al-Attar 2019)

Neuromuscular & skeletal: Femur fracture (atypical, diaphyseal, subtrochanteric) (Selga 2016)

Ophthalmic: Epithelial keratopathy (Nguyen 2019)

Renal: Acute interstitial nephritis (Philipponnet 2018)

Contraindications

Prolia: Hypersensitivity (systemic) to denosumab or any component of the formulation; preexisting hypocalcemia; pregnancy

Xgeva: Known clinically significant hypersensitivity to denosumab or any component of the formulation; preexisting hypocalcemia

Warnings/Precautions

Concerns related to adverse effects:

• Bone fractures: Atypical femur fractures have been reported in patients receiving denosumab. The fractures may occur anywhere along the femoral shaft (may be bilateral) and commonly occur with minimal to no trauma to the area. Some patients experience prodromal pain weeks or months before the fracture occurs. Because these fractures also occur in osteoporosis patients not treated with denosumab, it is unclear if denosumab therapy is the cause for the fractures; concomitant glucocorticoids may contribute to fracture risk. Advise patients to report new/unusual hip, thigh, or groin pain; and if so, evaluate for atypical/incomplete fracture. Contralateral limb should be assessed if atypical fracture occurs. Consider interrupting therapy in patients who develop an atypical femoral fracture. Following treatment discontinuation, the fracture risk increases, including risk of multiple vertebral fractures; patients with a history of prior fractures or osteoporosis are at higher risk. Vertebral fractures occurred as early as 7 months (average: 19 months) after the last dose of denosumab. Evaluate benefit/risk before initiating denosumab treatment for osteoporosis, especially in patients with prior vertebral fracture. If denosumab is discontinued, evaluate risk for vertebral fracture and consider transitioning to an alternative osteoporosis therapy. Because denosumab is associated with a severe bone turnover rebound following discontinuation, post-denosumab antiresorptive therapy (eg, bisphosphonate therapy or alternative) is suggested to mitigate decline in bone mineral density (ES [Eastell 2019]; Tsourdi 2017). Bisphosphonate therapy following denosumab discontinuation may reduce/prevent bone turnover rebound (Lamy 2017).

• Dermatologic reactions: Dermatitis, eczema, and rash (which are not necessarily specific to the injection site) have been reported. Consider discontinuing if severe symptoms occur.

• Hypersensitivity: Clinically significant hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis) has been reported. May include throat tightness, facial edema, upper airway edema, lip swelling, dyspnea, pruritus, rash, urticaria, and hypotension. If anaphylaxis or clinically significant hypersensitivity occurs, initiate appropriate management and permanently discontinue.

• Hypercalcemia: Hypercalcemia (clinically significant requiring hospitalization and complicated by acute renal injury) may occur in patients with giant cell tumor of bone and patients with growing skeletons weeks to months following discontinuation of denosumab therapy. Monitor for signs/symptoms of hypercalcemia (eg, nausea, vomiting, headache, decreased alertness), assess serum calcium periodically, and treat accordingly.

• Hypocalcemia: Denosumab may cause or exacerbate hypocalcemia; severe symptomatic cases (including fatalities) have been reported. An increased risk has been observed with increasing renal dysfunction, most commonly severe dysfunction (CrCl <30 mL/minute and/or on dialysis), and with inadequate/no calcium supplementation. Monitor calcium levels; correct preexisting hypocalcemia prior to therapy. Monitor levels more frequently when denosumab is administered with other drugs that can also lower calcium levels. Use caution in patients with a history of hypoparathyroidism, thyroid surgery, parathyroid surgery, malabsorption syndromes, excision of small intestine, severe renal impairment/dialysis, treatment with other calcium-lowering agents, or other conditions that would predispose the patient to hypocalcemia; monitor calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium closely during therapy (the manufacturer recommends monitoring within 14 days of injection [Prolia] or during the first weeks of therapy initiation [Xgeva]). Concomitant use of calcimimetic medications may worsen hypocalcemia. Hypocalcemia lasting weeks to months (and requiring frequent monitoring) has been reported in postmarketing analyses. Administer calcium, vitamin D, and magnesium as necessary. Patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/minute) or those on dialysis may also develop marked elevations of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH).

• Infection: Incidence of infections may be increased, including serious skin infections, abdominal, urinary, ear, or periodontal infections. Endocarditis has also been reported following use. Patients should be advised to contact their healthcare provider if signs or symptoms of severe infection or cellulitis develop. Use with caution in patients with impaired immune systems or using concomitant immunosuppressive therapy; may be at increased risk for serious infections. Evaluate the need for continued treatment with serious infection.

• Osteonecrosis of the jaw: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), also referred to as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), has been reported in patients receiving denosumab. ONJ may manifest as jaw pain, osteomyelitis, osteitis, bone erosion, tooth/periodontal infection, toothache, gingival ulceration/erosion. Risk factors include invasive dental procedures (eg, tooth extraction, dental implants, oral surgery), cancer diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapy, angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, chemotherapy, systemic corticosteroids, poor oral hygiene, use of a dental appliance, ill-fitting dentures, periodontal and/or other preexisting dental disease, diabetes and gingival infections, local infection with delayed healing, anemia, and/or coagulopathy. In studies of patients with cancer, a longer duration of denosumab exposure was associated with a higher incidence of ONJ, although a majority of patients had predisposing factors, including a history of poor oral hygiene, tooth extraction, or the use of a dental appliance. Patients should maintain good oral hygiene during treatment. A dental exam and appropriate preventive dentistry should be performed prior to therapy. The manufacturer's labeling recommends avoiding invasive dental procedures in patients with bone metastases receiving denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events and to consider temporary discontinuation of therapy in these patients if invasive dental procedure is required. According to a position paper by the American Association of Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), MRONJ has been associated with bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive agents (denosumab), and antiangiogenic agents (eg, bevacizumab, sunitinib) used for the treatment of osteoporosis or malignancy; risk is significantly higher in cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy compared to patients receiving osteoporosis treatment (regardless of medication used or dosing schedule). MRONJ risk is increased with intravenous antiresorptive therapy compared to the minimal risk associated with oral bisphosphonate use, although risk appears to increase with oral bisphosphonates when duration of therapy exceeds 4 years. The AAOMS suggests that if medically permissible, initiation of denosumab for cancer therapy should be delayed until optimal dental health is attained (if extractions are required, antiresorptive therapy should delayed until the extraction site has mucosalized or until after adequate osseous healing). Once denosumab is initiated for oncologic disease, procedures that involve direct osseous injury and placement of dental implants should be avoided. Patients developing ONJ during therapy should receive care by an oral surgeon (AAOMS [Ruggiero 2014]). According to the manufacturer, discontinuation of denosumab should be considered (based on risk/benefit evaluation) in patients who develop ONJ.

• Musculoskeletal pain: Severe and occasionally incapacitating bone, joint, and/or muscle pain has been reported (time to onset of symptoms has varied from one day to several months after initiating therapy). Consider discontinuing use if severe symptoms develop.

Disease-related concerns:

• Breast cancer: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) updated guidelines on the role of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in metastatic breast cancer patients (ASCO/CCO [Van Poznak 2017]). The guidelines recommend initiating a BMA (denosumab, pamidronate, zoledronic acid) in patients with metastatic breast cancer to the bone. One BMA is not recommended over another (evidence supporting one BMA over another is insufficient). The optimal duration of BMA therapy is not defined; however, the guidelines recommend continuing BMA therapy indefinitely. The analgesic effect of BMAs are modest and BMAs should not be used alone for pain management; supportive care, analgesics, adjunctive therapies, radiation therapy, surgery, and/or systemic anticancer therapy should be utilized.

• Multiple myeloma: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has updated guidelines on the role of BMAs in multiple myeloma (ASCO [Anderson 2018]). The update now includes denosumab as an alternate to zoledronic acid or pamidronate in patients with lytic disease, and as an additional option in adjunctive pain control in patients with pain due to osteolytic disease and patients receiving other interventions for fractures or impending fractures. Denosumab may also be preferred (to zoledronic acid) in patients with renal impairment. The ASCO guidelines recommend continuing the BMA for up to 2 years in multiple myeloma patients; BMAs may then be resumed upon relapse with new onset skeletal-related events. Denosumab has a reversible mechanism of action and therefore should not be discontinued abruptly (refer to Bone fractures [above] for further information).

• Osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers (nonmetastatic disease): Survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease who have osteoporosis (T score of -2.5 or lower in femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine) or who are at increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, should be offered bone modifying agents (utilizing the osteoporosis-indicated dose) to reduce the risk of fracture. For patients without hormonal responsive cancers, when clinically appropriate, estrogens may be administered along with other bone modifying agents (ASCO [Shapiro 2019]). The choice of bone modifying agent (eg, oral or IV bisphosphonates or subQ denosumab) should be based on several factors (eg, patient preference, potential adverse effects, quality of life considerations, availability, adherence, cost). Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, exercise (using a combination of exercise types), as well as lifestyle modifications (if indicated), should also be encouraged.

• Renal impairment: Use with caution in patients with renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis; risk of hypocalcemia is increased. Dose adjustment is not needed when administered at 60 mg every 6 months (Prolia); once-monthly dosing has not been evaluated in patients with renal impairment (Xgeva).

Dosage form specific issues:

• Latex: Packaging may contain natural latex rubber (Note: Prior to January 2023, the Prolia prescribing information stated the prefilled syringe gray needle cap contained dry natural rubber).

Special populations:

• Pediatric: May impair bone growth in children with open growth plates or inhibit eruption of dentition. Indicated only for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone in adolescents who are skeletally mature.

Other warnings/precautions:

• Appropriate use: Postmenopausal osteoporosis: For use in females at high risk for fracture which is defined as a history of osteoporotic fracture or multiple risk factors for fracture. May also be used in females who failed or did not tolerate other therapies.

• Duplicate therapy: Do not administer Prolia and Xgeva to the same patient for different indications.

• Long-term therapy: Denosumab therapy results in significant suppression of bone turnover; the long-term effects of treatment are not known, but may contribute to adverse outcomes such as ONJ, atypical fractures, or delayed fracture healing; monitor.

Dosage Forms Considerations

Prolia prefilled syringe gray needle cap contains dry natural rubber (a derivative of latex).

Dosage Forms: US

Excipient information presented when available (limited, particularly for generics); consult specific product labeling.

Solution, Subcutaneous [preservative free]:

Xgeva: 120 mg/1.7 mL (1.7 mL)

Solution Prefilled Syringe, Subcutaneous [preservative free]:

Prolia: 60 mg/mL (1 mL)

Generic Equivalent Available: US

No

Pricing: US

Solution (Xgeva Subcutaneous)

120 mg/1.7 mL (per mL): $2,254.89

Solution Prefilled Syringe (Prolia Subcutaneous)

60 mg/mL (per mL): $2,083.96

Disclaimer: A representative AWP (Average Wholesale Price) price or price range is provided as reference price only. A range is provided when more than one manufacturer's AWP price is available and uses the low and high price reported by the manufacturers to determine the range. The pricing data should be used for benchmarking purposes only, and as such should not be used alone to set or adjudicate any prices for reimbursement or purchasing functions or considered to be an exact price for a single product and/or manufacturer. Medi-Span expressly disclaims all warranties of any kind or nature, whether express or implied, and assumes no liability with respect to accuracy of price or price range data published in its solutions. In no event shall Medi-Span be liable for special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising from use of price or price range data. Pricing data is updated monthly.

Dosage Forms: Canada

Excipient information presented when available (limited, particularly for generics); consult specific product labeling.

Solution, Subcutaneous:

Xgeva: 120 mg/1.7 mL (1.7 mL)

Solution Prefilled Syringe, Subcutaneous:

Prolia: 60 mg/mL (1 mL) [contains mouse (murine) and/or hamster protein]

Administration: Adult

SUBQ: Denosumab is intended for SUBQ route only and should not be administered IV, IM, or intradermally. Prior to administration, bring to room temperature in original container (allow to stand ~15 to 30 minutes); do not warm by any other method. Solution may contain trace amounts of translucent to white protein particles; do not use if cloudy, discolored (normal solution should be clear and colorless to pale yellow), or contains excessive particles or foreign matter. Avoid vigorous shaking. Administer via SUBQ injection in the upper arm, upper thigh, or abdomen; should only be administered by a health care professional.

Administration: Pediatric

SubQ: Administer by SubQ injection only; do not administer intravenously, intramuscularly, or intradermally. Prior to administration, bring to room temperature in original container (allow to stand ~15 to 30 minutes); do not warm by any other method. Solution may contain trace amounts of translucent to white protein particles; do not use if cloudy, discolored (normal solution should be clear and colorless to pale yellow), or contains excessive particles or foreign matter. Avoid vigorous shaking. Administer via SubQ injection in the upper arm, upper thigh, or abdomen; should only be administered by a health care professional.

Xgeva: Use 27 gauge needle to withdraw dose from vial and administer subcutaneously.

Medication Guide and/or Vaccine Information Statement (VIS)

An FDA-approved patient medication guide, which is available with the product information and as follows, must be dispensed with this medication:

Prolia: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/125320s210lbl.pdf#page=31

Use: Labeled Indications

Bone metastases from solid tumors (Xgeva): Prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

Giant cell tumor of bone (Xgeva): Treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (in adults and skeletally mature adolescents) that is unresectable or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy (Xgeva): Treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy refractory to bisphosphonate therapy.

Multiple myeloma (Xgeva): Prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma.

Osteoporosis/bone loss (Prolia): Treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal females at high risk of fracture; treatment of osteoporosis (to increase bone mass) in males at high risk of fracture; treatment of bone loss (to increase bone mass) in males receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer; treatment of bone loss (to increase bone mass) in females receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer; treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients at high risk of fracture who are initiating or continuing systemic glucocorticoids at a daily dose equivalent to ≥7.5 mg of prednisone for an anticipated duration of at least 6 months (high risk defined as osteoporotic fracture history, multiple risk factors for fracture, or failure of or intolerance to other available osteoporosis therapy).

Use: Off-Label: Adult

Bone destruction caused by rheumatoid arthritis

Medication Safety Issues
Sound-alike/look-alike issues:

Denosumab may be confused with daclizumab, daratumumab, dinutuximab, dupilumab, durvalumab

Prolia may be confused with Udenyca

Xgeva may be confused with Jevtana, Xofigo, Xtandi, Zometa, Zytiga

High alert medication:

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) includes this medication among its list of drugs that have a heightened risk of causing significant patient harm when used in error.

Other safety concerns:

Duplicate therapy issues: Prolia contains denosumab, which is the same ingredient contained in Xgeva; patients receiving Xgeva should not be treated with Prolia

Metabolism/Transport Effects

None known.

Drug Interactions

Note: Interacting drugs may not be individually listed below if they are part of a group interaction (eg, individual drugs within “CYP3A4 Inducers [Strong]” are NOT listed). For a complete list of drug interactions by individual drug name and detailed management recommendations, use the Lexicomp drug interactions program by clicking on the “Launch drug interactions program” link above.

Calcimimetic Agents: Denosumab may enhance the hypocalcemic effect of Calcimimetic Agents. Risk C: Monitor therapy

Corticosteroids (Systemic): Denosumab may enhance the immunosuppressive effect of Corticosteroids (Systemic). Management: Consider the risk of serious infections versus the potential benefits of coadministration of denosumab and systemic corticosteroids. If combined, monitor patients for signs/symptoms of serious infections. Risk D: Consider therapy modification

Immunosuppressants (Cytotoxic Chemotherapy): Denosumab may enhance the immunosuppressive effect of Immunosuppressants (Cytotoxic Chemotherapy). Management: Consider the risk of serious infections versus the potential benefits of coadministration of denosumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy. If combined, monitor patients for signs/symptoms of serious infections. Risk D: Consider therapy modification

Immunosuppressants (Miscellaneous Oncologic Agents): Denosumab may enhance the immunosuppressive effect of Immunosuppressants (Miscellaneous Oncologic Agents). Management: Consider the risk of serious infections versus the potential benefits of coadministration of denosumab and immunosuppressants. If combined, monitor patients for signs/symptoms of serious infections. Risk D: Consider therapy modification

Immunosuppressants (Therapeutic Immunosuppressant Agents): May enhance the immunosuppressive effect of Denosumab. Management: Consider the risk of serious infections versus the potential benefits of coadministration of denosumab and immunosuppressants. If combined, monitor for signs/symptoms of serious infections. Risk D: Consider therapy modification

Methotrexate: Denosumab may enhance the immunosuppressive effect of Methotrexate. Management: Consider the risk of serious infections versus the potential benefits of coadministration of denosumab and immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate. If combined, monitor patients for signs/symptoms of serious infections. Risk D: Consider therapy modification

Reproductive Considerations

Evaluate pregnancy status prior to use in females of reproductive potential. Females of reproductive potential should be advised to use effective contraception during denosumab treatment and for at least 5 months following the last denosumab dose. Studies of denosumab following a single 60 mcg subcutaneous dose in healthy men demonstrated that denosumab is present in the semen in low concentrations (~2% of serum exposure) and therefore unlikely that a female partner or fetus would be exposed during unprotected sex to pharmacologically relevant denosumab concentrations via seminal fluid (Sohn 2016).

Pregnancy Considerations

Based on the mechanism of action and data from animal reproduction studies, in utero exposure to denosumab may cause fetal harm. Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2). Potential placental transfer of human IgG is dependent upon the IgG subclass and gestational age, generally increasing as pregnancy progresses. The lowest exposure would be expected during the period of organogenesis (Palmeira 2012; Pentsuk 2009). Use of Prolia is contraindicated during pregnancy.

Data collection to monitor pregnancy and infant outcomes following exposure to denosumab is ongoing. Health care providers are encouraged to enroll females exposed to denosumab during pregnancy in the Amgen Pregnancy Surveillance Program (1-800-772-6436).

Breastfeeding Considerations

It is not known if denosumab is present in breast milk.

According to the manufacturer, the decision to breastfeed during therapy should consider the risk of infant exposure, the benefits of breastfeeding to the infant, and benefits of treatment to the mother.

Dietary Considerations

Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake to prevent or treat hypocalcemia. Calcium 1,000 mg/day and vitamin D ≥400 units/day is recommended in product labeling (Prolia). If dietary intake is inadequate, dietary supplementation is recommended. Patients should consume:

Calcium: 1,000 mg/day (males: 50 to 70 years of age) or 1,200 mg/day (females ≥51 years of age and males ≥71 years of age) (IOM 2011; NOF 2014).

Vitamin D: 800 to 1,000 units/day (age ≥50 years) (NOF 2014). Recommended dietary allowance (RDA): 600 units/day (age ≤70 years) or 800 units/day (age ≥71 years) (IOM 2011).

Monitoring Parameters

Serum creatinine, serum calcium, phosphorus and magnesium (especially within the first 14 days of therapy [Prolia] or during the first weeks of therapy initiation [Xgeva]), pregnancy test (prior to treatment initiation in females of reproductive potential); signs/symptoms of hypocalcemia, especially in patients predisposed to hypocalcemia (severe renal impairment, thyroid/parathyroid surgery, malabsorption syndromes, hypoparathyroidism); signs/symptoms of hypercalcemia, including periodic serum calcium (following discontinuation in patients with giant cell tumor of the bone and patients with growing skeletons); infection, or dermatologic reactions; routine oral exam (prior to treatment); dental exam if risk factors for ONJ; signs/symptoms of hypersensitivity.

Osteoporosis: Serial bone mineral density (BMD) should be evaluated at baseline and every 1 to 3 years (usually at ~2 years following initiation of therapy, then more or less frequently depending on patient-specific factors and stability of BMD) (AACE/ACE [Camacho 2020]; ES [Eastell 2019]; NOF [Cosman 2014]); may consider monitoring biochemical markers of bone turnover (eg, fasting serum CTX or urinary NTX) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, to assess treatment response (ES [Eastell 2019]).

Patients with cancer: The American Society of Clinical Oncology hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening and management provisional clinical opinion (ASCO [Hwang 2020]) recommends HBV screening with hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, total Ig or IgG, and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen prior to beginning (or at the beginning of) systemic anticancer therapy; do not delay treatment for screening/results. Detection of chronic or past HBV infection requires a risk assessment to determine antiviral prophylaxis requirements, monitoring, and follow-up.

Mechanism of Action

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody with affinity for nuclear factor-kappa ligand (RANKL). Osteoblasts secrete RANKL; RANKL activates osteoclast precursors and subsequent osteolysis which promotes release of bone-derived growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), and increases serum calcium levels. Denosumab binds to RANKL, blocks the interaction between RANKL and RANK (a receptor located on osteoclast surfaces), and prevents osteoclast formation, leading to decreased bone resorption and increased bone mass in osteoporosis. In solid tumors with bony metastases, RANKL inhibition decreases osteoclastic activity leading to decreased skeletal related events and tumor-induced bone destruction. In giant cell tumors of the bone (which express RANK and RANKL), denosumab inhibits tumor growth by preventing RANKL from activating its receptor (RANK) on the osteoclast surface, osteoclast precursors, and osteoclast-like giant cells.

Pharmacokinetics (Adult Data Unless Noted)

Onset of action: Decreases markers of bone resorption by ~85% within 3 days; maximal reductions observed within 1 month.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy: Time to response (median): 9 days; Time to complete response (median): 23 days (Hu 2014).

Duration: Markers of bone resorption return to baseline within 12 months of discontinuing therapy.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy: Duration of response (median): 104 days; Duration of complete response (median): 34 days (Hu 2014).

Bioavailability: SUBQ: 62%.

Half-life elimination: ~25 to 28 days.

Time to peak, serum: 10 days (range: 3 to 21 days).

Brand Names: International
International Brand Names by Country
For country code abbreviations (show table)

  • (AE) United Arab Emirates: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (AR) Argentina: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (AT) Austria: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (AU) Australia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (BD) Bangladesh: Denosis;
  • (BE) Belgium: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (BG) Bulgaria: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (BR) Brazil: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (CH) Switzerland: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (CL) Chile: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (CN) China: Xgeva;
  • (CO) Colombia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (CZ) Czech Republic: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (DE) Germany: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (DO) Dominican Republic: Prolia;
  • (EC) Ecuador: Prolia;
  • (EE) Estonia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (EG) Egypt: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (ES) Spain: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (FI) Finland: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (FR) France: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (GB) United Kingdom: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (GR) Greece: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (HK) Hong Kong: Xgeva;
  • (HR) Croatia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (HU) Hungary: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (IE) Ireland: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (IN) India: Debrumab | Denaxa | Denbri | Deninta | Denoci | Denoclast | Denosurel | Densurank | Denu | Denub | Denuril | Esentra | Nuclasta | Ogain | Olimab | Prolia | Rozel | Xgeva;
  • (IT) Italy: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (JO) Jordan: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (JP) Japan: Pralia | Ranmark;
  • (KR) Korea, Republic of: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (LB) Lebanon: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (LT) Lithuania: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (LU) Luxembourg: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (LV) Latvia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (MX) Mexico: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (MY) Malaysia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (NL) Netherlands: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (NO) Norway: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (NZ) New Zealand: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (PE) Peru: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (PH) Philippines: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (PK) Pakistan: Prolia;
  • (PL) Poland: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (PR) Puerto Rico: Prolia;
  • (PT) Portugal: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (QA) Qatar: Prolia;
  • (RO) Romania: Xgeva;
  • (RU) Russian Federation: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (SA) Saudi Arabia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (SE) Sweden: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (SG) Singapore: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (SI) Slovenia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (SK) Slovakia: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (TH) Thailand: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (TN) Tunisia: Xgeva;
  • (TR) Turkey: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (TW) Taiwan: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (UA) Ukraine: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (UY) Uruguay: Prolia | Xgeva;
  • (ZA) South Africa: Prolia | Xgeva
  1. Adami S, Libanati C, Boonen S, et al. Denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis does not interfere with fracture-healing: results from the FREEDOM trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(23):2113-2119. [PubMed 23097066]
  2. Adler RA. Management of endocrine disease: Atypical femoral fractures: risks and benefits of long-term treatment of osteoporosis with anti-resorptive therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(3):R81-R87. doi:10.1530/EJE-17-1002 [PubMed 29339529]
  3. Al-Attar M, De Santis M, Massarotti M. DRESS syndrome in response to Denosumab: First documented case report. Bone Rep. 2019;12:100239. doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2019.100239 [PubMed 31890758]
  4. Anastasilakis AD, Evangelatos G, Makras P, Iliopoulos A. Rebound-associated vertebral fractures may occur in sequential time points following denosumab discontinuation: need for prompt treatment re-initiation. Bone Rep. 2020;12:100267. doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100267 [PubMed 32373677]
  5. Anderson K, Ismaila N, Flynn PJ, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update [published online ahead of print January 17, 2018]. J Clin Oncol. 2018:JCO2017766402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6402. [PubMed 29341831]
  6. Bailie G, Mason M. 2020 Dialysis of Drugs. Renal Pharmacy Consultants, LLC; 2020.
  7. Barth K, Sedivy M, Lindner G, Schwarz C. Successful treatment with denosumab for two cases with hypercalcemia due to vitamin D intoxication and associated acute kidney injury. CEN Case Rep. 2022;11(1):141-145. doi:10.1007/s13730-021-00643-5 [PubMed 34515963]
  8. Based on expert opinion.
  9. Bech A, de Boer H. Denosumab for tumor-induced hypercalcemia complicated by renal failure. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(12):906-907. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00026 [PubMed 22711097]
  10. Bhanot RD, Kaur J, Bhat Z. Severe hypocalcemia and dramatic increase in parathyroid hormone after denosumab in a dialysis patient: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Nephrol. 2019. doi:10.1155/2019/3027419 [PubMed 31016056]
  11. Blay J, Chawla SP, Martin Broto J, et al. Denosumab safety and efficacy in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): Interim results from A phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18s):10034 [abstract 10034 from 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting].
  12. Block GA, Bone HG, Fang L, et al. A Single-Dose Study of Denosumab in Patients With Various Degrees of Renal Impairment. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(7):1471-1479. [PubMed 22461041]
  13. Body JJ, Bone HG, de Boer RH, et al. Hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(13):1812-1821. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.016 [PubMed 26093811]
  14. Body JJ, Lipton A, Gralow J, et al. Effects of denosumab in patients with bone metastases with and without previous bisphosphonate exposure. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(3):440-446. [PubMed 19653815]
  15. Body JJ, von Moos R, Niepel D, Tombal B. Hypocalcaemia in patients with prostate cancer treated with a bisphosphonate or denosumab: prevention supports treatment completion. BMC Urol. 2018;18(1):81. doi:10.1186/s12894-018-0393-9 [PubMed 30236112]
  16. Bonani M, Frey D, de Rougemont O, et al. Infections in de novo kidney transplant recipients treated with the RANKL inhibitor denosumab. Transplantation. 2017;101(9):2139-2145. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001547 [PubMed 27798510]
  17. Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(4):972-980. [PubMed 21289258]
  18. Boonen S, Adachi JD, Man Z, et al. Treatment with denosumab reduces the incidence of new vertebral and hip fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(6):1727-1736. [PubMed 21411557]
  19. Boquete-Castro A, Gómez-Moreno G, Calvo-Guirado JL, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Delgado-Ruiz RA. Denosumab and osteonecrosis of the jaw. A systematic analysis of events reported in clinical trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(3):367-375. doi:10.1111/clr.12556 [PubMed 25639776]
  20. Branstetter DG, Nelson SD, Manivel JC, et al. Denosumab Induces Tumor Reduction and Bone Formation in Patients With Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(16):4415-4424. [PubMed 22711702]
  21. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, et al. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone Turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: A randomized, blinded, phase 3 Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(1):153-161. [PubMed 18767928]
  22. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis–2020 update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(suppl 1):1-46. doi:10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL [PubMed 32427503]
  23. Chawla S, Henshaw R, Seeger L, et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(9):901-908. [PubMed 23867211]
  24. Cohen SB, Dore RK, Lane NE, et al. Denosumab Treatment Effects on Structural Damage, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone Turnover in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Twelve-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(5):1299-1309. [PubMed 18438830]
  25. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359-2381. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2 [PubMed 25182228]
  26. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al. FREEDOM trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756-765. [PubMed 19671655]
  27. Dell R, Greene D. A proposal for an atypical femur fracture treatment and prevention clinical practice guideline. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(6):1277-1283. doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4506-9 [PubMed 29675745]
  28. Demirsoy U, Karadogan M, Selek Ö, et al. Golden bullet-denosumab: early rapid response of metastatic giant cell tumor of the bone. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;36(2):156-158. [PubMed 24072245]
  29. Diker-Cohen T, Rosenberg D, Avni T, Shepshelovich D, Tsvetov G, Gafter-Gvili A. Risk for infections during treatment with denosumab for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(5):dgz322. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz322 [PubMed 31899506]
  30. Dore RK, Cohen SB, Lane NE, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving concurrent glucocorticoids or bisphosphonates. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(5):872-875. [PubMed 19734132]
  31. Dupont J, Laurent MR, Dedeyne L, Luyten FP, Gielen E, Dejaeger M. Vertebral fractures after denosumab cessation. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020;87(6):337-338. doi:10.3949/ccjm.87a.19152 [PubMed 32487552]
  32. Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Shoback D. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1595-1622. doi:10.1210/jc.2019-00221 [PubMed 30907953]
  33. Ellis GK, Bone HG, Chlebowski R, et al. Randomized trial of denosumab in patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for nonmetastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(30):4875-4882. [PubMed 18725648]
  34. Epstein MS, Ephros HD, Epstein JB. Review of current literature and implications of RANKL inhibitors for oral health care providers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol. 2013;116(6):e437-e444. [PubMed 22901640]
  35. Expert opinion. Senior Renal Editorial Team: Bruce Mueller, PharmD, FCCP, FASN, FNKF; Jason A. Roberts, PhD, BPharm (Hons), B App Sc, FSHP, FISAC; Michael Heung, MD, MS.
  36. FDA Safety Alert. Medwatch. Summary Safety Review - Denosumab (Prolia and Xgeva) - Hearing loss and deafness. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/reviews-examens/denosumab. Published June 6, 2016. Accessed June 17, 2016.
  37. Ferrari S, Lewiecki EM, Butler PW, et al. Favorable skeletal benefit/risk of long-term denosumab therapy: a virtual-twin analysis of fractures prevented relative to skeletal safety events observed. Bone. 2020;134:115287. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115287 [PubMed 32092479]
  38. Ferrari-Lacraz S, Ferrari S. Do RANKL inhibitors (denosumab) affect inflammation and immunity? Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(2):435-446. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1326-y [PubMed 20571772]
  39. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813-822. [PubMed 21353695]
  40. Grávalos C, Rodríguez C, Sabino A, et al. SEOM Clinical Guideline for bone metastases from solid tumours (2016). Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18(12):1243-1253. [PubMed 27896639]
  41. Gutiérrez-Fernández D, Cruz MJ, Foncubierta-Fernández A, et al. Monoclonal antibody desensitization in a patient with a generalized urticarial reaction following denosumab administration. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015;11:29. doi:10.1186/s13223-015-0097-6 [PubMed 26504466]
  42. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab verses zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1125-1132. [PubMed 21343556]
  43. Hu MI, Glezerman IG, Leboulleux S, et al. Denosumab for treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):3144-3152. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1001 [PubMed 24915117]
  44. Huynh AL, Baker ST, Stewardson AJ, Johnson DF. Denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia: incidence, severity and patient characteristics in a tertiary hospital setting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(11):1274-1278. doi:10.1002/pds.4045 [PubMed 27255807]
  45. Hwang JP, Feld JJ, Hammond SP, et al. Hepatitis B virus screening and management for patients with cancer prior to therapy: ASCO provisional clinical opinion update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(31):3698-3715. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.01757 [PubMed 32716741]
  46. Imatoh T, Sai K, Takeyama M, et al. Identification of risk factors and development of detection algorithm for denosumab-induced hypocalcaemia. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44(1):62-68. doi:10.1111/jcpt.12753 [PubMed 30144112]
  47. IOM (Institute of Medicine), Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
  48. Ishikawa K, Nagai T, Sakamoto K, et al. High bone turnover elevates the risk of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1831-1840. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S123172 [PubMed 27980413]
  49. Jalleh R, Basu G, Le Leu R, Jesudason S. Denosumab-induced severe hypocalcaemia in chronic kidney disease. Case Rep Nephrol. 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/7384763 [PubMed 30519493]
  50. Jamal SA, Ljunggren O, Stehman-Breen C, et al. Effects of denosumab on fracture and bone mineral density by level of kidney function. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(8):1829-1835. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.403. [PubMed 21491487]
  51. Kaku T, Oh Y, Sato S, et al. Incidence of atypical femoral fractures in the treatment of bone metastasis: an alert report. J Bone Oncol. 2020;23:100301. doi:10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100301 [PubMed 32642421]
  52. Kearns AE, Khosla S, Kostenuik PJ. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(2):155-192. doi:10.1210/er.2007-0014 [PubMed 18057140]
  53. Kendler DL, Roux C, Benhamou CL, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(1):72-81. [PubMed 19594293]
  54. Khan AA, Morrison A, Hanley DA, et al; International Task Force on osteonecrosis of the jaw. Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(1):3-23. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2405 [PubMed 25414052]
  55. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work Group. KDIGO 2017 clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2017;7(1):1-59. doi:10.1016/j.kisu.2017.04.001 [PubMed 30675420]
  56. King BJ, Lehman JS, Sartori Valinotti JC. Denosumab-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction with distinct clinical and histopathologic findings. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(2):156-158. doi:10.1111/cup.13070 [PubMed 29076163]
  57. Kyrgidis A, Toulis KA. Denosumab-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(1):369-370. [PubMed 20306021]
  58. Lamy O, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Stoll D, Hans D, Aubry-Rozier B. Severe rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation: 9 clinical cases report. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(2):354-358. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-3170. [PubMed 27732330]
  59. Lau LH, Cliff ERS, Wong V, et al. Hypocalcaemia following denosumab in prostate cancer: a clinical review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2020;92(6):495-502. doi:10.1111/cen.14169 [PubMed 32017154]
  60. Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, McClung MR, et al. Two-Year Treatment With Denosumab (AMG 162) in a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Postmenopausal Women With Low BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(12):1832-1841. [PubMed 17708711]
  61. Lipton A, Steger GG, Figueroa J, et al. Extended efficacy and safety of denosumab in breast cancer patients with bone metastases not receiving prior bisphosphonate therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(20):6690-6696. [PubMed 18927312]
  62. Lipton A, Steger GG, Figueroa J, et al. Randomized active-controlled phase II study of denosumab efficacy and safety in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4431-4437. [PubMed 17785705]
  63. Lyakhovitsky A, Oshinsky S, Gilboa S, Barzilai A. Alopecia areata after denosumab treatment for osteoporosis. JAAD Case Rep. 2016;2(4):298-300. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.06.003 [PubMed 27512722]
  64. Malnick S, Maor Y, Melzer E, Ziv-Sokolowskaia NN, Neuman MG. Severe hepatocytotoxicity linked to denosumab. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(1 suppl):78-85. [PubMed 28379592]
  65. Manzaneque A, Chaguaceda C, Mensa M, Bastida C, Creus-Baró N. Use and safety of denosumab in cancer patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(3):522-526. doi:10.1007/s11096-017-0455-1 [PubMed 28382583]
  66. Marlow CF, Sharma S, Babar F, Lin J. Severe hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia with denosumab in advanced chronic kidney disease: case report and literature review. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/2059364 [PubMed 30405927]
  67. Mazokopakis EE. Denosumab-induced normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism in a woman with postmenopausal osteoporosis and normal renal function. Curr Drug Saf. 2018;13(3):214-216. doi:10.2174/1574886313666180608080355 [PubMed 29879891]
  68. McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, et al. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(8):821-831. [PubMed 16495394]
  69. Min BW, Koo KH, Park YS, et al. Scoring system for identifying impending complete fractures in incomplete atypical femoral fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(2):545-550. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2787 [PubMed 27802096]
  70. Miyaoka D, Imanishi Y, Ohara M, et al. Impaired residual renal function predicts denosumab-induced serum calcium decrement as well as increment of bone mineral density in non-severe renal insufficiency. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(1):241-249. doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4688-1 [PubMed 30187112]
  71. Mosch A, Ettl T, Mamilos A, et al. Physiological concentrations of denosumab enhance osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells of the jaw bone. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;101:23-29. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.03.005 [PubMed 30870701]
  72. National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF). Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC, 2014. http://nof.org/files/nof/public/content/file/2791/upload/919.pdf
  73. Nguyen MTD, Sebag M, Harissi-Dagher M. Band keratopathy developing after denosumab injections. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2019;25(2):30-32. doi:10.5693/djo.02.2019.04.001 [PubMed 31327935]
  74. North American Menopause Society. Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the 2021 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2021;28(9):973-997. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000001831 [PubMed 34448749]
  75. Okada N, Kawazoe K, Teraoka K, et al. Identification of the risk factors associated with hypocalcemia induced by denosumab. Biol Pharm Bull. 2013;36(10):1622-1626. doi:10.1248/bpb.b13-00496. [PubMed 23934346]
  76. Okuma S, Matsuda Y, Nariai Y, Karino M, Suzuki R, Kanno T. A retrospective observational study of risk factors for denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases from solid cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(5):1209. doi:10.3390/cancers12051209 [PubMed 32408510]
  77. Palmeira P, Quinello C, Silveira-Lessa AL, Zago CA, Carneiro-Sampaio M. IgG placental transfer in healthy and pathological pregnancies. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:985646. doi: 10.1155/2012/985646. [PubMed 22235228]
  78. Papapoulos S, Chapurlat R, Libanati C, et al. Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(3):694-701. [PubMed 22113951]
  79. Peer A, Khamaisi M. Diabetes as a risk factor for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. J Dent Res. 2015;94(2):252-260. doi:10.1177/0022034514560768 [PubMed 25477311]
  80. Pentsuk N, van der Laan JW. An interspecies comparison of placental antibody transfer: new insights into developmental toxicity testing of monoclonal antibodies. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2009;86(4):328-344. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20201. [PubMed 19626656]
  81. Philipponnet C, Kemeny JL, Aniort J, Garrouste C, Heng AE. Immunoallergic interstitial nephritis secondary to denosumab. Joint Bone Spine. 2018;85(2):253-254. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.01.005 [PubMed 28115267]
  82. Png MA, Koh JS, Goh SK, Fook-Chong S, Howe TS. Bisphosphonate-related femoral periosteal stress reactions: scoring system based on radiographic and MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(4):869-877. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6794 [PubMed 22451554]
  83. Prolia (denosumab) [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc; January 2023.
  84. Raje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):370-381. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30072-X [PubMed 29429912]
  85. Refer to manufacturer's labeling.
  86. Rosen HN. Denosumab for osteoporosis. Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed June 20, 2022b.
  87. Rosen HN, Drezner MK. Overview of the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed April 20, 2022a.
  88. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, et al; American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw--2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):1938-1956. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031. [PubMed 25234529]
  89. Saad F, Brown JE, Van Poznak C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1341-1347. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr435 [PubMed 21986094]
  90. Saag KG, Wagman RB, Geusens P et al. Denosumab versus risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, non-inferiority study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(6):445-454. [PubMed 29631782]
  91. Sanchez A, Lozier M, Adkinson BC, Ilaiwy A. c-ANCA vasculitis after initiation of denosumab. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(3):e228336. doi:10.1136/bcr-2018-228336 [PubMed 30826782]
  92. Saylor PJ, Rumble RB, Tagawa S, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for prostate cancer: ASCO endorsement of a Cancer Care Ontario guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):1736-1743. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.03148 [PubMed 31990618]
  93. Scagliotti GV, Hirsh V, Siena S, et al. Overall survival improvement in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases treated with denosumab versus zoledronic acid: Subgroup analysis from a randomized phase 3 study. J Thorac Oncol, 2012;7(12):1823-1829. [PubMed 23154554]
  94. Selga J, Nuñez JH, Minguell J, Lalanza M, Garrido M. Simultaneous bilateral atypical femoral fracture in a patient receiving denosumab: case report and literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(2):827-832. doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3355-z [PubMed 26501556]
  95. Shane E. Treatment of hypercalcemia. Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. https://www.uptodate.com. Accessed August 17, 2022.
  96. Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(1):1-23. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1998 [PubMed 23712442]
  97. Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2916-2946. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01696. [PubMed 31532726]
  98. Smith MR, Egerdie B, Hernández Toriz N, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):745-755. [PubMed 19671656]
  99. Smith MR, Saad F, Coleman R, et al. Denosumab and bone-metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results of a phase 3, pandomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9810):39-46. [PubMed 22093187]
  100. Sohn W, Lee E, Kankam MK, et al. An open-label study in healthy men to evaluate the risk of seminal fluid transmission of denosumab to pregnant partners. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(2):362-369. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12798. [PubMed 26447647]
  101. Starr J, Tay YKD, Shane E. Current understanding of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of atypical femur fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(4):519-529. doi:10.1007/s11914-018-0464-6 [PubMed 29951870]
  102. Stopeck AT, Fizazi K, Body JJ, et al. Safety of long-term denosumab therapy: results from the open label extension phase of two phase 3 studies in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):447-445. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2904-5 Erratum in: Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct 19. [PubMed 26335402]
  103. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: A randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5132-5139. [PubMed 21060033]
  104. Takahashi M, Ozaki Y, Kizawa R, et al. Atypical femoral fracture in patients with bone metastasis receiving denosumab therapy: a retrospective study and systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):980. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6236-6 [PubMed 31640606]
  105. Taylor KH, Middlefell LS, Mizen KD. Osteonecrosis of the jaws induced by anti-RANK ligand therapy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(3):221-223. [PubMed 19836866]
  106. Thomas D, Henshaw R, Skubitz K, et al. Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: An open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(3):275-280. [PubMed 20149736]
  107. Thongprayoon C, Acharya P, Acharya C, et al. Hypocalcemia and bone mineral density changes following denosumab treatment in end-stage renal disease patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(8):1737-1745. doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4533-6 [PubMed 29713798]
  108. Tsourdi E, Langdahl B, Cohen-Solal M, et al. Discontinuation of denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: A systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone. 2017;105:11-17. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003 [PubMed 28789921]
  109. Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published online October 26, 2020. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa756 [PubMed 33103722]
  110. Tyan A, Patel SP, Block S, Hughes T, McCowen KC. Rebound vertebral fractures in a patient with lung cancer after oncology-dose denosumab discontinuation: a cautionary tale. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019;3(2):235-237. doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.003 [PubMed 31193884]
  111. Ueda T, Morioka H, Nishida Y, et al. Objective tumor response to denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone: a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(10):2149-2154. [PubMed 26205395]
  112. Ueki K, Yamada S, Tsuchimoto A, et al. Rapid progression of vascular and soft tissue calcification while being managed for severe and persistent hypocalcemia induced by denosumab treatment in a patient with multiple myeloma and chronic kidney disease. Intern Med. 2015;54(20):2637-2642. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4946 [PubMed 26466702]
  113. van Cann T, Loyson T, Verbiest A, et al. Incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with both bone resorption inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(3):869-878. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3903-5 [PubMed 28963584]
  114. Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(35):3978-3986. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614. [PubMed 29035643]
  115. Van Poznak CH, Temin S, Yee GC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1221-1227. [PubMed 21343561]
  116. Watts NB, Adler RA, Bilezikian JP, et al; Endocrine Society. Osteoporosis in men: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):1802-1822. [PubMed 22675062]
  117. Watts NB, Roux C, Modlin JF, et al. Infections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or placebo: coincidence or causal association? Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(1):327-337. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1755-2 [PubMed 21892677]
  118. Xgeva (denosumab) [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc; February 2020.
  119. Xgeva (denosumab) [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc; June 2020.
  120. Yang SP, Kim TW, Boland PJ, Farooki A. Retrospective review of atypical femoral fracture in metastatic bone disease patients receiving denosumab therapy. Oncologist. 2017;22(4):438-444. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0192 [PubMed 28275116]
  121. Yarom N, Shapiro CL, Peterson DE, et al. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: MASCC/ISOO/ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(25):2270-2290. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01186 [PubMed 31329513]
Topic 15575 Version 256.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟