ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Colovesical fistulas

Colovesical fistulas
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Mar 08, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — A colovesical fistula (CVF) is an abnormal connection between the colon and urinary bladder. Although they are uncommon, CVFs can cause significant morbidity, affect quality of life, and may lead to death, usually secondary to urosepsis [1,2]. Although a CVF can be diagnosed clinically, imaging and endoscopy are often required to delineate the extent of a fistula and to elucidate its etiology [3]. Surgery is usually required to repair a CVF.

The epidemiology, etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of colovesical fistulas are reviewed here. Other types of fistulas related to the gastrointestinal and urological systems are covered in separate topic reviews. (See "Enterocutaneous and enteroatmospheric fistulas" and "Rectovaginal and anovaginal fistulas" and "Anorectal fistula: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Urogenital tract fistulas in females".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — The precise incidence of colovesical fistulas (CVFs) is unknown. It is estimated that CVFs account for 1 in every 3000 surgical hospital admissions [4]. In patients with diverticular disease, 2 to 18 percent were found to have CVFs [5-8]. In patients with Crohn's disease, fewer than 1 percent developed a CVF [9].

The male-to-female ratio of CVF is approximately 2 to 3:1 [1,10-13]. Females are protected possibly because the uterus and broad ligaments act as a barrier between the sigmoid colon and the bladder. This theory is supported by the fact that a high percentage of females with CVFs (>50 percent in some series) have had a previous hysterectomy [13].

CVFs most commonly affect patients in their sixth or seventh decades. The mean age at presentation is between 55 and 75 years [1,10-12].

ETIOLOGY — Colovesical fistulas (CVFs) are most commonly a complication of diverticulitis, cancer, or Crohn's disease.

Diverticulitis accounts for 65 to 79 percent of cases, with the sigmoid being the most frequently affected portion of the colon [2,5,11,14,15]. In these patients, a ruptured diverticulum leads to peridiverticular inflammation and abscess, which eventually erodes into the bladder.

Cancer accounts for 10 to 20 percent of CVFs. Malignant CVFs usually result from direct invasion of a colonic adenocarcinoma into the urinary bladder [2]. Less often, the primary tumor may arise from the bladder, adnexa, or other pelvic organs [16,17].

Longstanding Crohn's colitis is responsible for 5 to 7 percent of colovesical fistulas [2].

Other rare etiologies of CVF include complications from surgery or colonic stents [18], tuberculosis [19], lymphoma [20], spilled gallstones [21], chicken bone ingestion [22], appendicitis [23], coccidiomycosis [24], pelvic radiation therapy [25], and penetrating abdominal trauma [26].

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS — Although the underlying cause of colovesical fistulas (CVFs) most often originates in the colon, patients usually present with lower urinary tract symptoms, including:

Pneumaturia (in 50 to 95 percent of cases)

Fecaluria (in 40 to 70 percent of cases)

Suprapubic pain (in 30 to 90 percent of cases)

Dysuria

Urgency

Frequency

Gross hematuria (rare)

Pneumaturia is usually appreciated toward the end of urination because the collection of gas usually sits at the top of the bladder. Pneumaturia and/or fecaluria can be found in approximately 90 percent of patients with a CVF [2,3,13,27-29]. Other causes of pneumaturia, including recent instrumentation, urinary tract infections with gas-forming organisms, and emphysematous cystitis, are either simple to exclude or exceptionally rare [28]. Thus, the finding of pneumaturia or fecaluria is virtually pathognomonic for urinary tract fistulas, and patients presenting with this condition should be presumed to have a CVF and investigated accordingly.

In addition, some patients report passage of cloudy, malodorous urine, often with visible debris. Over time, the cystitis associated with a CVF may evolve to pyelonephritis, systemic infections, or renal impairment.

Beyond urinary tract symptoms, patients with CVF may note gastrointestinal symptoms attributable to underlying diverticulitis, colon cancer, or Crohn's disease. Uncommonly, they may report systemic symptoms such as fever, excessive sweating, or malaise. Some patients report urine passage per rectum, but this is rare [13].

Aside from visible debris in the urine, findings on physical examination are nonspecific and often reflect the underlying etiology of the fistula. These can include abdominal tenderness, abdominal mass, weight loss, or cutaneous manifestations of Crohn's disease. (See "Perianal Crohn disease".)

EVALUATION AND DIAGNOSIS — Colovesical fistulas (CVFs) should be suspected in patients who present with pneumaturia or fecaluria. The diagnosis is confirmed by abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan with oral or rectal but not intravenous (IV) contrast demonstrating air or contrast material in the bladder with adjacent thickened colonic and vesicular walls. Patients who are diagnosed with a CVF should undergo colonoscopy to rule out an underlying malignancy. Patients who are suspected of having a malignant fistula (due to colon or bladder cancer) should also undergo a cystoscopy to assess possible cancer invasion of the bladder. Most other investigations are optional, case specific, or reserved for low-resource settings.

Initial tests to diagnose colovesical fistula

Urinalysis and urine culture — Urine laboratory studies are invariably abnormal in colovesical fistulas. Routine urinalysis reveals pyuria and bacteriuria. Microscopic evaluation will show sediments of vegetable matter, leukocytes, and undigested muscle fibers (rhabdomyocytes) in keeping with fecaluria [30]. Urine cultures will usually grow enterococci or coliforms, mostly Escherichia coli (81 percent of cultures). Cultures often grow a single species (43 to 71 percent) rather than the expected mixed flora [25,30,31]. Other routine blood tests, such as serum creatinine and leukocyte count, are nonspecific [25].

Abdominopelvic CT with oral or rectal contrast — An abdominopelvic CT with oral or rectal contrast (but not IV contrast) is the imaging test of choice for diagnosing a CVF. Although the CVF tract is only visualized in approximately 64 percent of cases [12], CT is extremely sensitive for the presence of intravesical air and contrast. Considering this finding, some authors have reported that CT can accurately detect the presence of CVF in up to 90 to 100 percent of patients [2,32].

If a fistula is suspected, the initial images of the CT scan should be acquired with oral or rectal contrast but without IV contrast. IV contrast is eliminated renally, and its excretion into the urinary bladder can confuse the origin of contrast found in the bladder. The use of IV contrast also reduces the distinction between the fistula tract and the surrounding inflamed tissue. To better image an underlying disease process, it is reasonable to obtain a second phase with IV contrast.

Findings on CT scan that are suggestive of a CVF include:

Oral or rectal contrast in the bladder on a non-IV contrast scan

Air in the bladder with no prior instrumentation

Presence of colonic diverticula

Presence of abutting colon and bladder wall thickening

Besides confirming the presence of a fistula, the result of a CT scan can also be used to:

Determine the etiology of the fistula (eg, findings of diverticular disease, cancer)

Delineate the course of the fistulous tract, especially its relationship to the bladder trigone

Assess adjacent anatomical structures in preparation for surgical management (eg, tumors or associated abscesses in the pelvis)

Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy to identify etiology — Patients in whom a CVF on CT is confirmed should then undergo a colonoscopy to determine the underlying etiology of the fistula.

CVFs are infrequently detected by lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. The reported sensitivities ranged between 0 and 55 percent, with most series reporting at the lower end of this range [1,2,32]. Thus, colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy should be used to diagnose the underlying etiology of a CVF rather than to identify the fistula itself. Endoscopy is the best test for assessing the colonic mucosa and remains the most sensitive diagnostic test for colonic carcinoma [12]. If a suspicious lesion is found, biopsies can be taken to help guide management.

Cystoscopy for suspected malignant fistula — When patients are suspected of having a malignant CVF, a cystoscopy should be performed to rule out bladder involvement. We take this approach when the preoperative imaging suggests that the colon is fistulizing near the trigone (figure 1) rather than its usual location at the bladder dome.

The sensitivity for detecting CVF on cystoscopy is between 40 and 87 percent [1,3,12]. Findings are usually nonspecific and include edema, erythema, and ulceration [13]. Thus, a cystoscopy should only be performed in patients whose CVF is suspected to be caused by cancer (bladder or colon) and knowledge of invasion would change management.

A fistula caused by colon cancer is typically confirmed by a lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Bladder cancer is a rare cause of CVF (2 to 5 percent) [2,29,33] and should be suspected in the following patients:

Patients with a personal history of bladder cancer

Patients with frank hematuria

Patients with evidence of a bladder mass on imaging

Patients in whom workup (CT, endoscopy) fails to reveal a colonic cause of the CVF

In CVF patients who need a cystoscopy, one is often performed at the beginning of the fistula surgery and has the added benefit of facilitating ureteric stenting, a procedure often used to facilitate identification of the ureters in a challenging surgical field.

Infrequently performed tests — Other tests that are not routinely used in the diagnosis of CVF include [2,12,34]:

Poppy seed test – The poppy seed test involves oral intake of 35 to 250 g of poppy seeds in a patient suspected of having a CVF [35,36]. Since the seeds pass through the gastrointestinal tract largely undigested, their presence in urine within 48 hours of consumption confirms the presence of a fistula. The test is easy and inexpensive to perform. Several authors have reported detection rates of 100 percent [35,36]. However, it provides no details regarding the location or etiology of the CVF. Thus, in patients who have a positive poppy seed test, a CT scan is still required.

Plain radiography – A plain abdominal radiograph is not generally helpful. On occasion, an erect plain film can show an air-fluid level within the bladder in a patient with a CVF.

Lower gastrointestinal exam (barium enema) – Barium enema (BE) has a low sensitivity for detecting CVF (approximately 30 percent) [2]. Radiographing a centrifuged first urine sample obtained after a BE (Bourne test) can increase the sensitivity to 90 percent [37]. Although the ability to simultaneously detect a CVF and determine its underlying cause (eg, diverticulitis, colon cancer) is an advantage of BE [1], contrast-enhanced CT scans and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies have largely replaced BE in the diagnosis of CVF [2,3,12].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – The efficacy of MRI has been established in the diagnosis of complex Crohn's fistulas and perianal fistulas with high sensitivities and specificities [12,34]. Its role in patients with confirmed or suspected CVF is still evolving. MRI has the advantage of being able to confirm the presence of a CVF, delineate its course, and assess the surrounding anatomy simultaneously without the use of oral or rectal contrast. The cost and accessibility of MRI, however, continue to limit its use to complex fistulas [12].

TREATMENT — The treatment of a colovesical fistula (CVF) is primarily surgical. Prior to surgery, however, patients need to be treated for any urologic or abdominal sepsis that may result from the CVF.

Treat symptomatic infection if present — Whenever a patient presents with urological or abdominal sepsis from a fistula, the treatment of sepsis always takes precedence over repair of the fistula. The initial treatment of urologic or abdominal sepsis includes fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, and control of the septic source. (See "Evaluation and management of suspected sepsis and septic shock in adults".)

The initial choice of antibiotic therapy should be directed toward covering colonic flora. A quinolone with metronidazole or amoxicillin-clavulanate is commonly used. In patients who develop sepsis from a CVF, the urinary bladder should be decompressed with a Foley catheter. The addition of bowel rest and total parenteral nutrition is optional [2] but generally not required in the treatment of CVF.

Definitive treatment of fistula — Once sepsis is resolved, most patients should undergo definitive repair of their CVFs. A defunctioning colostomy was once advocated as a simple means to allow the fistula to close spontaneously and prevent urinary sepsis [38], but the fistula closure rate was low, the risk of urinary tract infection persisted, and many CVFs recurred [1,2]. Thus, defunctioning colostomy is rarely performed alone. (See 'Operative management' below.)

Nonoperative management is reserved for patients who either have comorbidities that preclude surgery, unresectable cancer, or who have minimal symptoms and do not desire surgery. (See 'Nonoperative management' below.)

Operative management — Operative management of a colovesical fistula is guided by its underlying etiology. If there is ambiguity about whether a fistula is benign or malignant, it is best to treat it as if it were a malignant fistula. The extent of the resection is dictated by the fistula's etiology, its location, and the condition of the patient. Patients generally do well with surgical management of CVFs, and postoperative recurrence is uncommon.

Benign fistula — Most CVFs are benign. A single-stage bowel resection with primary anastomosis, without diversion, is suitable for treating the great majority of such patients. Multistaged procedures are generally reserved for patients who are at a high risk of developing anastomotic leak or cannot tolerate a prolonged operation. For patients with a CVF caused by diverticulitis, laparoscopic treatment is feasible in experienced hands [39,40].

Preoperatively, all patients should have a urinary catheter inserted and positioned so that it can be accessed during the operation. In the initial approach, it is generally best to mobilize the colon proximally and distally to the fistula. Special attention must be paid to locate and preserve the left ureter.

In treating nonmalignant CVFs, the colon can often be dissected off the bladder using blunt dissection (the "pinch" technique). Where sharp dissection is necessary, caution must again be exercised to avoid injuring the ureter. Once separated, the fistulous tract itself may not be convincingly seen on either the bladder or the colon. If necessary, the fistula may be located by distending the bladder with methylene blue solution instilled through the urinary catheter [39]. The bladder side of the fistulous tract often does not require any intervention beyond decompression with Foley catheter. If the fistula opening is visible, it can be managed by simple closure with absorbable suture [39,41]. Partial cystectomy is not generally necessary since inflammation of the bladder is secondary to pathology in the colon and induration should resolve after the bowel has been resected. Where possible, we place the omentum between the colon and the bladder [42].

In patients with complex inflammatory bowel disease, small bowel and other structures may be involved in fistula formation, which may necessitate resection of multiple loops of bowel. (See "Surgical management of Crohn disease", section on 'Fistula'.)

Multistage operation — Staged procedures are generally reserved for patients who are at a high risk of developing anastomotic leak or who cannot tolerate a prolonged operation. Risk factors for developing anastomotic leaks include gross fecal contamination, large abscesses, corticosteroid use, previous pelvic radiation therapy, and hemodynamic instability.

Options for multistage procedures include:

Colonic resection and anastomosis with a protective stoma, usually a loop ileostomy, followed by closure of the stoma (two-stage).

Colonic resection with end colostomy, followed by colonic anastomosis with colostomy reversal (two-stage).

Colonic resection with end colostomy, followed by colonic anastomosis with a protective stoma, followed by closure of the stoma (three-stage).

Minimally invasive approaches — Although CVF was once considered a contraindication to laparoscopic resection [43], CVFs caused by diverticular disease are increasingly treated by experienced surgeons using laparoscopic techniques [44]. Increasingly large series have been published showing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular CVF. Although the conversion rate to open surgery remains as high as 50 percent in some reports, this approach seems safe and with complication rates that are similar to those of open procedures [45]. A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on laparoscopic versus open surgery for CVF concluded that minimally invasive surgery was associated with shorter length of stay with no differences in anastomotic leak, mortality, and surgical site infection rates [46].

Robotic surgery for CVF is also performed [47,48]. Case series and reports remain scarce, but presumably the benefits would be similar to those of laparoscopic surgery but with some benefit in terms of decreased conversion rate.

Malignant fistula — Patients with a malignant CVF require a multivisceral resection of at least the affected portions of the colon and bladder. Principles of oncologic resection for the underlying cancer must be respected. For colon cancer, which is the most common malignancy causing CVF, this entails performing an en bloc resection of the cancer to negative proximal, distal, and radial margins, and a regional lymphadenectomy. (See "Surgical resection of primary colon cancer", section on 'General principles'.)

Depending upon the patient's condition, a single- or multistage procedure may be required to treat a malignant fistula. (See 'Multistage operation' above.)

Postoperative management of the bladder — We prefer to leave the urinary catheter in for seven days in most patients after a CVF repair. A postoperative cystogram at the time of Foley catheter removal is generally unnecessary in simple cases but can be performed at the surgeon's discretion or in cases involving complex bladder repair [39].

Traditionally, a urinary catheter was left indwelling for at least 10 days after a CVF repair to decompress the bladder and decrease the risk of urine leak [49-51]. Long periods of catheterization, however, are associated with increased risk of infection, discomfort, bladder atony, and prolonged hospitalization [51]. Other studies suggest that, in simple cases of CVF, removal of the catheter after seven days is safe and does not lead to more complications [41,51]. Performing early cystogram may allow for some patients to have their urinary catheter removed as early as the second postoperative day [52].

Nonoperative management — In CVF patients who do not desire surgery because their symptoms are minimal, expectant management is reasonable, provided that the fistula is not malignant. It used to be believed that foregoing operative repair may predispose patients to urosepsis or uremia, with up to 75 percent dying from septic complications [1]. Contemporary studies, however, report much lower complication rates, with some fistulas even closing spontaneously [6,27,53,54].

In the setting of benign CVFs, some authors have reported the use of endoscopic injection of fibrin glue [55,56] or endoscopic clipping devices [57]. These techniques remain experimental with very few reported cases. Similarly, covered stents have been used in the palliation of patients with malignant and nonmalignant colovesical fistulas where surgery has been deemed inappropriate [58].

In patients who have both a malignant bowel stricture and a CVF, inserting a covered intestinal stent is a reasonable approach to managing both the stricture and the fistula. This potential benefit must be weighed against the known complications of enteral stenting [59]. (See "Enteral stents for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Definition and etiology – A colovesical fistula (CVF) is an abnormal connection between the colon and urinary bladder. It is most commonly a complication of diverticulitis, cancer, or Crohn's disease. Men and older patients are affected more by CVFs. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Epidemiology' above and 'Etiology' above.)

Clinical manifestations – Patients generally present with lower urinary tract symptoms and signs, among which pneumaturia and fecaluria are virtually pathognomonic for CVFs. (See 'Clinical manifestations' above.)

Diagnosis – CVF should be suspected in patients who present with pneumaturia or fecaluria. The diagnosis is confirmed by abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan with oral or rectal, but not intravenous, contrast demonstrating air or contrast material in the bladder with adjacent thickened colonic and vesicular walls. (See 'Evaluation and diagnosis' above.)

Diagnostic evaluation – Patients who are diagnosed with a CVF should undergo colonoscopy to rule out an underlying malignancy. Patients who are suspected of having a malignant fistula (due to colon or bladder cancer) should also undergo a cystoscopy to assess possible bladder involvement. (See 'Evaluation and diagnosis' above.)

Treatment – The treatment of a CVF is primarily surgical. Prior to surgery, however, patients need to be treated for any urologic or abdominal sepsis that may result from the CVF. (See 'Treatment' above.)

For most patients with benign CVFs, a single-stage colonic resection followed by seven days of bladder drainage offers good results for a CVF repair. This can be performed with open or minimally invasive techniques. Patients who have a malignant fistula require multivisceral resection following oncologic principles.

Multistage procedures or nonoperative management can be used to treat CVFs in patients with comorbid conditions.

  1. Garcea G, Majid I, Sutton CD, et al. Diagnosis and management of colovesical fistulae; six-year experience of 90 consecutive cases. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8:347.
  2. Golabek T, Szymanska A, Szopinski T, et al. Enterovesical fistulae: aetiology, imaging, and management. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013; 2013:617967.
  3. Melchior S, Cudovic D, Jones J, et al. Diagnosis and surgical management of colovesical fistulas due to sigmoid diverticulitis. J Urol 2009; 182:978.
  4. PUGH JI. ON THE PATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR OF ACQUIRED NON-TRAUMATIC VESICO-INTESTINAL FISTULA. Br J Surg 1964; 51:644.
  5. Pollard SG. Colovesical fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988; 70:184.
  6. Amin M, Nallinger R, Polk HC Jr. Conservative treatment of selected patients with colovesical fistula due to diverticulitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984; 159:442.
  7. Menenakos E, Hahnloser D, Nassiopoulos K, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for fistulas that complicate diverticular disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 388:189.
  8. Labs JD, Sarr MG, Fishman EK, et al. Complications of acute diverticulitis of the colon: improved early diagnosis with computerized tomography. Am J Surg 1988; 155:331.
  9. Gruner JS, Sehon JK, Johnson LW. Diagnosis and management of enterovesical fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. Am Surg 2002; 68:714.
  10. Smeenk RM, Plaisier PW, van der Hoeven JA, Hesp WL. Outcome of surgery for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas of diverticular origin in 40 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1559.
  11. Morrison PD, Addison NV. A study of colovesical fistulae in a district hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1983; 65:221.
  12. Holroyd DJ, Banerjee S, Beavan M, et al. Colovaginal and colovesical fistulae: the diagnostic paradigm. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16:119.
  13. Woods RJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, et al. Internal fistulas in diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31:591.
  14. Najjar SF, Jamal MK, Savas JF, Miller TA. The spectrum of colovesical fistula and diagnostic paradigm. Am J Surg 2004; 188:617.
  15. Beatty JD, Witherow R. Diagnostic lessons learnt from a series of enterovesical fistulae. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7:196.
  16. McCaffrey JC, Foo FJ, Dalal N, Siddiqui KH. Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma associated with hydronephrosis and colovesical fistula formation: report of a case. Tumori 2009; 95:808.
  17. Moss RL, Ryan JA Jr. Management of enterovesical fistulas. Am J Surg 1990; 159:514.
  18. Barbaryan A, Jabri H, Attakamvelly S, Mirrakhimov AE. A case of colovesical fistula caused by the eroded rectal stent. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013.
  19. Bandyopadhyay S, Das C, Maity PK, et al. Isolated colonic tuberculosis with colovesical fistula. J Assoc Physicians India 2010; 58:396.
  20. Genta RM, Ramchandani MK, Gyorkey F, et al. Enterovesical fistula due to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in AIDS. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993; 16:333.
  21. Gooneratne DL. A rare late complication of spilled gallstones. N Z Med J 2010; 123:62.
  22. Clements MB, Hedrick TL, Colen DL, Schenkman NS. Colovesical fistula caused by an ingested chicken bone. Urology 2013; 82:e37.
  23. Cockell A, McQuillan T, Doyle TN, Reid DJ. Colovesical fistula caused by appendicitis. Br J Clin Pract 1990; 44:682.
  24. Kuntze JR, Herman MH, Evans SG. Genitourinary coccidioidomycosis. J Urol 1988; 140:370.
  25. Krco MJ, Jacobs SC, Malangoni MA, Lawson RK. Colovesical fistulas. Urology 1984; 23:340.
  26. Crispen PL, Kansas BT, Pieri PG, et al. Immediate postoperative complications of combined penetrating rectal and bladder injuries. J Trauma 2007; 62:325.
  27. Solkar MH, Forshaw MJ, Sankararajah D, et al. Colovesical fistula--is a surgical approach always justified? Colorectal Dis 2005; 7:467.
  28. Daniels IR, Bekdash B, Scott HJ, et al. Diagnostic lessons learnt from a series of enterovesical fistulae. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4:459.
  29. El-Haddad HM, Kassem MI, Sabry AA, Abouelfotouh A. Surgical protocol and outcome for sigmoidovesical fistula secondary to diverticular disease of the left colon: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2018; 56:115.
  30. Raymond PL, Gibler WB. Detection of colovesical fistula in the emergency department: report of a case. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7:191.
  31. Carson CC, Malek RS, Remine WH. Urologic aspects of vesicoenteric fistulas. J Urol 1978; 119:744.
  32. Dolejs SC, Penning AJ, Guzman MJ, et al. Perioperative Management of Patients with Colovesical Fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1867.
  33. Yang CH, Liu KH, Chen TC, et al. Enterovesical fistula caused by a bladder squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:4215.
  34. Tang YZ, Booth TC, Swallow D, et al. Imaging features of colovesical fistulae on MRI. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:1371.
  35. Kwon EO, Armenakas NA, Scharf SC, et al. The poppy seed test for colovesical fistula: big bang, little bucks! J Urol 2008; 179:1425.
  36. Schwaibold H, Popiel C, Geist E, Hartung R. Oral intake of poppy seed: a reliable and simple method for diagnosing vesico-enteric fistula. J Urol 2001; 166:530.
  37. Amendola MA, Agha FP, Dent TL, et al. Detection of occult colovesical fistula by the Bourne test. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142:715.
  38. Mayo CW, Miller JM. Surgical treatment of sigmoidovesical fistulas. Arch Surg 1940; 40:897.
  39. Bertelson NL, Abcarian H, Kalkbrenner KA, et al. Diverticular colovesical fistula: What should we really be doing? Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:31.
  40. Marney LA, Ho YH. Laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistula: experience in 15 cases and review of the literature. Int Surg 2013; 98:101.
  41. Ferguson GG, Lee EW, Hunt SR, et al. Management of the bladder during surgical treatment of enterovesical fistulas from benign bowel disease. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207:569.
  42. O'Leary DP. Use of the greater omentum in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:533.
  43. Köhler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E. Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:430.
  44. Cirocchi R, Cochetti G, Randolph J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of colovesical fistulas due to complicated colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18:873.
  45. Martinolich J, Croasdale DR, Bhakta AS, et al. Laparoscopic Surgery for Diverticular Fistulas: Outcomes of 111 Consecutive Cases at a Single Institution. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1015.
  46. Trejo-Avila M, Vergara-Fernández O. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of diverticular colovesical fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:E570.
  47. Maciel V, Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, et al. Diverticular disease complicated with colovesical fistula: laparoscopic versus robotic management. Int Surg 2014; 99:203.
  48. Hite MA, Hopkins MB, Khan A. Robotic Low Anterior Resection With Transanal Extraction for Colovesical Fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:e53.
  49. Walker KG, Anderson JH, Iskander N, et al. Colonic resection for colovesical fistula: 5-year follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4:270.
  50. Kirsh GM, Hampel N, Shuck JM, Resnick MI. Diagnosis and management of vesicoenteric fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 173:91.
  51. de Moya MA, Zacharias N, Osbourne A, et al. Colovesical fistula repair: is early Foley catheter removal safe? J Surg Res 2009; 156:274.
  52. Holland C, Vabi BW, Shenoy PP, et al. Removal of Indwelling Urinary Catheter Two Days After Colovesical Fistula Repair: a Single-Arm Prospective Trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2597.
  53. Radwan R, Saeed ZM, Phull JS, et al. How safe is it to manage diverticular colovesical fistulation non-operatively? Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:448.
  54. Khanbhai M, Hodgson C, Mahmood K, et al. Colo-vesical fistula: Complete healing without surgical intervention. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5:448.
  55. Sharma SK, Perry KT, Turk TM. Endoscopic injection of fibrin glue for the treatment of urinary-tract pathology. J Endourol 2005; 19:419.
  56. Yashi M, Muraishi O, Yuzawa M, Tokue A. [A case of colo-vesico-vaginal fistula caused by sigmoid colon diverticulitis]. Hinyokika Kiyo 1998; 44:513.
  57. Velayos B, Del Olmo L, Merino L, et al. Non-visible colovesical fistula located by cystoscopy and successfully managed with the novel Padlock® device for endoscopic closure. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:827.
  58. Ahmad M, Nice C, Katory M. Covered metallic stents for the palliation of colovesical fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92:W43.
  59. Watt AM, Faragher IG, Griffin TT, et al. Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2007; 246:24.
Topic 104293 Version 8.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟